Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1320

Proposed Order re 1318 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Dkt. Nos. 927, 991, 1013, 1022, 1060, and 1206 Proposed Order Granting Samsung's Administrative Motion to File Under Seal by Samsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC(a Delaware limited liability company). (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 7/25/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
APPLE INC., a California corporation,

CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG

12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
15 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
16 York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
17 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
18

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS
UNDER SEAL

Defendants.

19
20
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung
21
Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) have filed Samsung’s
22
Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal.
23
Samsung has filed the declarations required under Civil L.R. 79-5, General Order No. 62,
24
and this Court's July 17, 2012 Order to provide evidence of compelling reasons for this Court to
25
permit filing under seal. The declarations establish that the below documents contain
26
information that has been designated by the parties as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL –
27
ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY.
28

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

1

Accordingly, for good cause and compelling reasons shown, the Court ORDERS that the

2 following documents shall be filed under seal:
3

1.

Samsung’s Motion to Exclude Opinions of Certain of Apple’s Experts

4

2.

Ex. 1 to Martin Declaration in Support of Samsung’s Notice of Motion and Motion

5
6

to Exclude Opinions of Certain of Apple’s Experts
3.

7
8

Opinions of Certain of Apple’s Experts
4.

9
10

5.

6.

7.

8.

Exhibit O to the Declaration of Michel Maharbiz in Support of Apple’s Opposition
to Samsung’s Motion for Summary Judgment

9.

19
20

Ex. G to Declaration of Terry L. Musika in Support of Apple’s Opposition to
Samsung’s Motion for Summary Judgment

17
18

Ex. F to Declaration of Terry L. Musika in Support of Apple’s Opposition to
Samsung’s Motion for Summary Judgment

15
16

Ex. 5 to Martin Declaration in Support of Samsung’s Motion to Exclude Opinions of
Certain of Apple’s Experts

13
14

Ex. 3 to Martin Declaration in Support of Samsung’s Motion to Exclude Opinions of
Certain of Apple’s Experts

11
12

Ex. 2 to Martin Decl. of Giho Ro in Support of Samsung’s Motion to Exclude

Ex. 37 to Declaration of Peter Bressler in support of Apple’s Opposition to
Samsung’s Motion for Summary Judgment

10.

Ex. B to Declaration of Michael J. Wagner in Support of Samsung’s Reply in

21

Support of Motion to Strike Expert Testimony Based on Undisclosed Facts and

22

Theories

23

11.

Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s Motions in Limine

24

12.

Ex. 42 to Declaration of Kanada in Support of Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s

25
26
27
28

Motions in Limine
13.

Ex. 43 to Declaration of Kanada in Support of Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s
Motions in Limine
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

1

14.

2

Ex. 44 to Declaration of Kanada in Support of to Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s
Motions in Limine

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6 DATED:

______________, 2012

7
8
9

Honorable Luch H. Koh
United States District Judge

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
-3[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL