Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
1386
NOTICE of Appearance by David Allan Kays for Non-Party Qualcomm Incorporated (Kays, David) (Filed on 7/26/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
DAVID A. KAYS, ESQ. (SBN 120798)
FREEDA Y. LUGO, ESQ. (SBN 244913)
MORGAN, FRANICH, FREDKIN & MARSH
99 Almaden Boulevard, Suite 1000
San Jose, California 95113-1613
Telephone: (408) 288-8288
Facsimile: (408) 288-8325
Attorneys for Non-Party
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,
13
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
14
15
v.
19
20
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
OF DAVID A. KAYS FOR
NON-PARTY QUALCOMM
INCORPORATED
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
a Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation; and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company,
Defendants.
16
17
18
Judge: Honorable Lucy H. Koh
21
22
TO THE CLERK OF THIS COURT, THE PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS
23
OF RECORD:
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
28
1
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF DAVID A. KAYS FOR NON-PARTY QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
(Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK)
1
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that David A. Kays hereby enters his appearance as an
2
additional counsel of record in this case for Non-Party Qualcomm Incorporated, for the
3
limited purpose of requesting the sealing of Qualcomm Incorporated’s confidential and
4
propriety information, which it understands may be presented at trial in this case, as well
5
as any proceedings related to that request, and certifies that he is admitted to practice in
6
this Court.
7
8
Dated: July 26, 2012
MORGAN, FRANICH, FREDKIN & MARSH
9
10
11
By:
/S/
DAVID A. KAYS
Attorneys for Non-Party QUALCOMM INC.
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF DAVID A. KAYS FOR NON-PARTY QUALCOMM INCORPORATED
(Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?