Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1386

NOTICE of Appearance by David Allan Kays for Non-Party Qualcomm Incorporated (Kays, David) (Filed on 7/26/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 DAVID A. KAYS, ESQ. (SBN 120798) FREEDA Y. LUGO, ESQ. (SBN 244913) MORGAN, FRANICH, FREDKIN & MARSH 99 Almaden Boulevard, Suite 1000 San Jose, California 95113-1613 Telephone: (408) 288-8288 Facsimile: (408) 288-8325 Attorneys for Non-Party QUALCOMM INCORPORATED 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 APPLE INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, 13 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK 14 15 v. 19 20 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF DAVID A. KAYS FOR NON-PARTY QUALCOMM INCORPORATED SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean corporation; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Defendants. 16 17 18 Judge: Honorable Lucy H. Koh 21 22 TO THE CLERK OF THIS COURT, THE PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS 23 OF RECORD: 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 28 1 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF DAVID A. KAYS FOR NON-PARTY QUALCOMM INCORPORATED (Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK) 1 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that David A. Kays hereby enters his appearance as an 2 additional counsel of record in this case for Non-Party Qualcomm Incorporated, for the 3 limited purpose of requesting the sealing of Qualcomm Incorporated’s confidential and 4 propriety information, which it understands may be presented at trial in this case, as well 5 as any proceedings related to that request, and certifies that he is admitted to practice in 6 this Court. 7 8 Dated: July 26, 2012 MORGAN, FRANICH, FREDKIN & MARSH 9 10 11 By: /S/ DAVID A. KAYS Attorneys for Non-Party QUALCOMM INC. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF DAVID A. KAYS FOR NON-PARTY QUALCOMM INCORPORATED (Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?