Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
1397
Joint Statement re Meet and Confer to Discuss Objections to Exhibit Translations by Samsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC(a Delaware limited liability company). (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 7/26/2012) Modified text on 7/27/2012 (dhm, COURT STAFF).
1
[COUNSEL LISTED ON SIGNATURE PAGES]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK
JOINT STATEMENT RE: MEET AND
CONFER TO DISCUSS OBJECTIONS TO
EXHIBIT TRANSLATIONS
Plaintiff,
vs.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
Defendant.
Date: July 26, 2012
Judge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh
02198.51855/4876863.3
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
JOINT STATEMENT RE: MEET AND CONFER TO DISCUSS OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBIT TRANSLATIONS
1
The parties inform the Court that, after meeting and conferring for several hours on their
respective translations of the foreign language trial exhibits, they have reached agreement on the
vast majority of the disputed translations. The parties will stipulate to and substitute mutually
agreeable translations for the exhibits on which agreement has been made.
The parties are continuing to discuss a much smaller number of disputed translations.
Because agreement on several translations appears likely if parties have additional time to
consider their positions, the parties have agreed to do so and to meet and confer again shortly.
The parties will submit a statement concerning this set of translations by Saturday, July 28, 2012
at 6PM.
This Statement and the meet and confer relates to the sets of trial exhibits served on July 5,
to which translation objections were made, and do not pertain to any additional foreign language
exhibits that may have been included in the supplemental trial exhibits that were just served this
week.
On July 26, 2012, the parties met and conferred to discuss objections to the parties'
respective translations of foreign language exhibits. The parties were able to resolve almost all
disagreements and are continuing to work to resolve the remaining disputes. The parties also
discussed and came to an agreement regarding the process for substituting new translations
reflecting the parties' agreed upon translations.
The parties will file a statement regarding the remaining disputes by no later than 6:00 PM
on Saturday July 29, 2012.
02198.51855/4876863.3
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
JOINT STATEMENT RE: MEET AND CONFER TO DISCUSS OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBIT TRANSLATIONS
1 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
By:
/s/ Richard Hung
HAROLD J. MCELHINNY
MICHAEL A. JACOBS
RACHEL KREVANS
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR
ALISON M. TUCHER
RICHARD S.J. HUNG
JASON R. BARTLETT
Attorneys for APPLE INC.
By:
/s/ Victoria Maroulis
CHARLES K. VERHOEVEN
KEVIN P.B. JOHNSON
VICTORIA F. MAROULIS
MICHAEL T. ZELLER
Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
CO. LTD, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC., AND SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4876863.3
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-2JOINT STATEMENT RE: MEET AND CONFER TO DISCUSS OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBIT TRANSLATIONS
1
GENERAL ORDER ATTESTATION
2
I, Victoria Maroulis, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file the
3
foregoing document. I hereby attest pursuant to General Order 45.X.B. that concurrence in the
4
electronic filing of this document has been obtained from Richard Hung.
5
6
/s/ Victoria Maroulis
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4876863.3
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-3JOINT STATEMENT RE: MEET AND CONFER TO DISCUSS OBJECTIONS TO EXHIBIT TRANSLATIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?