Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1401

OBJECTIONS to re 1245 Notice (Other), 1284 Notice (Other) APPLE INC.'S OBJECTIONS AND COUNTERDESIGNATIONS TO SAMSUNG'S RULE 26(a)(3) DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 7/26/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66,781)
[e-mail]
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111,664)
[e-mail]
RACHEL KREVANS (CA SBN 116,421)
[e-mail]
RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197,425)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

8
9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION

12

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180)
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim-Defendant Apple Inc.

11

13

WILLIAM F. LEE (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
60 State Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,
vs.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity, SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation, and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
Defendants.

Civil Action No. 11-CV-01846-LHK

APPLE INC.’S OBJECTIONS AND
COUNTERDESIGNATIONS TO
SAMSUNG’S RULE 26(a)(3)
DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity, SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation, and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
Counterclaim-Plaintiffs,
v.
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Counterclaim-Defendant.

27
28

sf-3175758

APPLE INC.’S OBJECTIONS AND
COUNTERDESIGNATIONS TO SAMSUNG’S
RULE 26(a)(3) DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

1

Apple submits the following objections and counterdesignations to Samsung’s amended

2

deposition designations, filed on July 23, 2012 and as corrected on July 25, 2012.

3

I.

OBJECTIONS TO SAMSUNG’S DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS

4

Apple objects to Samsung’s presentation of deposition testimony from:

5



any Apple employee or expert witness who is available to testify live at trial, unless
the testimony was provided under Rule 30(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure or by a managing agent;



any presently-employed Samsung employee on the ground that such employees are
not unavailable to Samsung;



any witness whose deposition took place after the fact discovery close, except
depositions taken by agreement of the parties or under Court order in this action;



any witness within the Court’s subpoena powers under Rule 45(b)(2) and not under
court order or prior agreement of the parties; and



any Apple expert not listed in Apple’s revised witness list, filed on July 23, 2012.

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

Apple’s specific objections and counterdesignations to Samsung’s individual deposition
designations are contained in the attached Exhibit A.
Dated: July 26, 2012

17

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
By:

18

/s/ Michael A. Jacobs
Michael A. Jacobs

19

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP

20

By:

21

/s/ Mark D. Selwyn
Mark D. Selwyn

For Plaintiff APPLE INC.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

sf-3175758

APPLE INC.’S OBJECTIONS AND
COUNTERDESIGNATIONS TO SAMSUNG’S
RULE 26(a)(3) DEPOSITION DESIGNATIONS
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)