Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
1403
MOTION to Remove Incorrectly Filed Documents [DOCKET NOS. 1385-1, 1385-2] filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 7/27/2012) Modified text on 7/30/2012 (dhm, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)
hmcelhinny@mofo.com
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)
mjacobs@mofo.com
RACHEL KREVANS (CA SBN 116421)
rkrevans@mofo.com
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368)
jtaylor@mofo.com
ALISON M. TUCHER (CA SBN 171363)
atucher@mofo.com
RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)
rhung@mofo.com
JASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530)
jasonbartlett@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: (415) 268-7000
Facsimile: (415) 268-7522
WILLIAM F. LEE
william.lee@wilmerhale.com
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
Telephone: (617) 526-6000
Facsimile: (617) 526-5000
MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180)
mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: (650) 858-6000
Facsimile: (650) 858-6100
11
12
13
Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC.
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN JOSE DIVISION
17
18
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Plaintiff,
v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York
corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company,
Case No.
5:11-cv-01846-LHK
APPLE’S MOTION TO REMOVE
INCORRECTLY FILED
DOCUMENTS
[DOCKET NOS. 1385-1, 1385-2]
Defendants.
26
27
28
APPLE’S MOTION TO REMOVE INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENTS [DOCKET NOS. 1385-1, 1385-2]
CASE NO. 5:11-CV-01846 LHK
sf-3175781
1
2
3
4
Apple hereby moves the Court to remove the following documents from ECF, submitted
electronically on July 26, 2012:
Exhibit 6 to the Declaration of Joby Martin in Support of Samsung’s Daubert Motion
(“Martin Declaration”).
5
Exhibit 7 to Martin Declaration.
6
The above documents consist of Exhibit 32 to the Expert Report of Terry L. Musika and
7
Exhibit 32-S to the Supplemental Expert Report of Terry L. Musika and have been filed multiple
8
times in connection with various briefs. Apple’s Renewed Motion to Seal, filed July 24, 2012,
9
requested sealing of these documents (See, e.g., Ex. 1 to the Declaration of Erica Tierney in
10
Support of Apple’s Renewed Motion to Seal (“Tierney Declaration”) at 210 (Exhibit 32 to
11
Musika Report); Ex. 4 to Tierney Declaration at 97 (Exhibit 32-S to Supp. Musika Report); Ex. 6
12
to Tierney Declaration (Exhibit 32-S to Supp. Musika Report).) However, Apple inadvertently
13
did not include Exhibits 6 and 7 to the Martin Declaration in the enumeration of instances of the
14
document to be sealed. As a result, Samsung filed Exhibits 6 and 7 publicly.
15
The ECF Help Desk has already been contacted and has locked the documents in question,
16
and is awaiting the Court’s order to remove them from the record. Apple will today file and
17
lodge with the Clerk’s Office a corrected renewed motion to seal that includes Exhibits 6 and 7 to
18
the Martin Declaration.
19
20
21
22
For the foregoing reasons, Apple respectfully requests that the Court grant Apple’s
Motion to Remove Incorrectly Filed Documents [Docket Nos. 1385-1, 1385-2].
Counsel for Samsung confirmed that Samsung does not oppose this motion.
Dated: July 27, 2012
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
23
24
25
26
27
By: /s/ Michael A. Jacobs
MICHAEL A. JACOBS
Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim-Defendant
APPLE INC.
28
APPLE’S MOTION TO REMOVE INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENTS [DOCKET NOS. 1385-1, 1385-2]
CASE NO. 5:11-CV-01846 LHK
sf-3175781
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?