Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1412

MOTION for Leave to File Reply in Support of 1408 Renewed Motion to Seal, filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Proposed Order)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 7/27/2012) Modified on 7/30/2012 linking entry to document #1408 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781) MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664) RACHEL KREVANS (CA SBN 116421) JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368) ALISON M. TUCHER (CA SBN 171363) RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425) JASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530) MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: (415) 268-7000 Facsimile: (415) 268-7522 WILLIAM F. LEE WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 60 State Street Boston, MA 02109 Telephone: (617) 526-6000 Facsimile: (617) 526-5000 MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180) WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 950 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 858-6000 Facsimile: (650) 858-6100 11 12 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC. 13 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SAN JOSE DIVISION 18 APPLE INC., a California corporation, 19 20 21 22 23 Plaintiff, v. Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK APPLE’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF RENEWED MOTION TO SEAL SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean corporation; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 24 Defendants. 25 26 27 28 APPLE INC.’S ADMIN. MOT. FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY ISO RENEWED MOTION TO SEAL CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK sf-3162599 1 In accordance with Northern District of California Civil Local Rule 7-11, Apple 2 respectfully moves the Court for leave to file a Reply in Support of its Renewed Motion to Seal. 3 Third party Reuters America LLC filed a response opposing both parties’ renewed 4 motions to seal. (Dkt. No. 1330.) In light of the extremely sensitive nature of the documents at 5 issue and the implications on the rights of third parties, and to ensure completeness of the record 6 in advance of the July 27 hearing, Apple respectfully requests that the Court grant this motion so 7 that Apple may have a fair opportunity to respond to Reuters’ contentions. A copy of the 8 proposed reply is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 9 10 Dated: July 27, 2012 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 11 12 13 By: /s/ Michael A. Jacobs Michael A. Jacobs Attorneys for Plaintiff APPLE INC. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 APPLE INC.’S ADMIN. MOT. FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY ISO RENEWED MOTION TO SEAL CASE NO. 11-CV-1846-LHK sf-3162599

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?