Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
1450
MOTION for Leave to File Sur-Reply Re Apple's New Arguments On Reply Re Apple's Motion to Enforce Court Orders Regarding Sony Designs filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc.(a New York corporation), Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC(a Delaware limited liability company). (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 7/29/2012)
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151)
charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 875-6600
Facsimile: (415) 875-6700
Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129)
kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com
Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603)
victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com
th
555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5 Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065
Telephone: (650) 801-5000
Facsimile: (650) 801-5100
Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417)
michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com
865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: (213) 443-3000
Facsimile: (213) 443-3100
Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC. and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,
vs.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
Defendants.
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK
SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
FILE SUR-REPLY TO APPLE’S NEW
ARGUMENTS ON REPLY RE: APPLE’S
MOTION TO ENFORCE COURT
ORDERS REGARDING SONY DESIGNS
02198.51855/4880251.1
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY
TO APPLE’S NEW ARGUMENTS ON REPLY
1
Samsung respectfully requests leave to file a sur-reply to address new evidence and
2 arguments raised for the first time in Apple’s Reply In Support of its Motion to Enforce Court
3 Orders Regarding Sony Designs (Dkt. 1437). Apple’s moving papers sought to preclude use of
4 “Sony-style” CAD drawings and e-mails on the basis that this evidence was purportedly stricken
5 by Judge Grewal, and further sought to preclude use of related testimony on these issues on the
6 grounds that the testimony was untimely, and that Apple never agreed to allow its use in this
7 action. Apple did not articulate any other bases for its motion. Dkt. 1420.
8
After Samsung demonstrated in its Opposition to Apple’s Motion that (1) the documentary
9 evidence was not excluded by Judge Grewal, and (2) the evidence is probative of a number of
10 disputed issues wholly separate from the invalidity theories set forth in Mr. Sherman’s report,
11 Apple submitted a reply brief that introduces an entirely new theory, i.e., that a project code12 named “purple” purportedly rebuts one of the asserted bases for admission of the evidence.
13
Similarly, with respect to the challenged deposition testimony, after Samsung presented
14 clear evidence in its opposition brief that, contrary to its counsel’s sworn declaration, Apple had
15 agreed to use the testimony in this case, Apple now argues that, notwithstanding its prior
16 misrepresentation, the testimony should nonetheless be excluded under Rule 403. That argument
17 was nowhere mentioned in Apple’s moving papers.
18
In light of Apple’s new arguments made for the first time in its Reply brief, Samsung
19 respectfully requests leave to file a short sur-reply brief to address these new arguments, a copy of
20 which is attached as Exhibit A to the concurrently-filed declaration of Adam Cashman.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4880251.1
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-1SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY
TO APPLE’S NEW ARGUMENTS ON REPLY
1 DATED: July 29, 2012
2
3
4
5
6
7
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
By /s/ Victoria F. Maroulis
Charles K. Verhoeven
Victoria F. Maroulis
Kevin P.B. Johnson
Michael T. Zeller
Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC., and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4880251.1
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-2SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SUR-REPLY
TO APPLE’S NEW ARGUMENTS ON REPLY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?