Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 148

Declaration of Austin Tarango in Support of #147 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed bySamsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Related document(s) #147 ) (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 8/8/2011)

Download PDF
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151) 2 charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com 50 California Street, 22nd Floor 3 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-6600 4 Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 5 Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129) kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com 6 Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603) victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com th 7 555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5 Floor Redwood Shores, California 94065 8 Telephone: (650) 801-5000 Facsimile: (650) 801-5100 9 Edward DeFranco (Cal. Bar No.165596) 10 eddefranco@quinnemanuel.com 51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor 11 New York, New York 10010 Telephone: (212) 849-7000 12 Facsimile: (212) 849-7100 13 Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417) michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com 14 865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor Los Angeles, California 90017 15 Telephone: (213) 443-3000 Facsimile: (213) 443-3100 16 Attorneys for Samsung Electronics America, Inc. 17 and Samsung Telecommunications America LLC 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 19 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION 20 21 APPLE INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, 22 23 DECLARATION OF AUSTIN TARANGO IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL vs. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a 24 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New 25 York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, 26 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 27 CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK Date: August 24, 2011 Time: 2:00 pm Place: Courtroom 4, 5th Floor Judge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh Defendants. 28 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK DECLARATION OF AUSTIN TARANGO IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL 1 I, Austin Tarango, declare: 2 1. I am an associate in the law firm of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, 3 counsel for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung 4 Telecommunications America, LLC. I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this 5 declaration and, if called upon as a witness, I could and would testify to such facts under oath. 6 2. The confidential version of the Declaration of Eunha Kim In Support of Samsung’s 7 Reply In Support of its Motion to Disqualify Bridges & Mavrakakis LLP (the “Kim Reply 8 Declaration”) contains confidential, non-public information regarding a settlement meeting that 9 occurred between Apple and Samsung in or about September 2010. Pursuant to General Order 10 No. 62, a copy of the Declaration has been lodged with the Court for in camera review, served on 11 all parties, and will be e-filed with the Court pending the Court's granting of this Motion to Seal. 12 3. The following portions of the Kim Reply Declaration have been properly filed 13 under seal: Paragraphs 5-6. 14 4. Exhibit F of the Tarango Reply Declaration contains excerpts from the deposition 15 of Mr. Richard Lutton (the “Lutton Tr.”). Apple has designated this deposition HIGHLY 16 CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY under the interim protective order. These 17 deposition excerpts also relate to the settlement meetings between Samsung and Apple and include 18 detailed, confidential, and non-public information regarding discussions that took place at these 19 meetings between Apple and Samsung. Pursuant to General Order No. 62, a copy of Exhibit F has 20 been lodged with the Court for in camera review, served on all parties, and will be e-filed with the 21 Court pending the Court's granting of this Motion to Seal. 22 5. Given that Apple designated Mr. Lutton's deposition testimony HIGHLY 23 CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY, and his testimony reveals confidential 24 information regarding the settlement meetings between Samsung and Apple, the entire transcript 25 provided in Exhibt F is properly filed under seal. 26 6. The confidential version of Samsung's Reply In Support of Its Motion to Disqualify 27 Bridges & Mavrakakis LLP. (“Reply”) contains confidential, non-public information regarding a 28 settlement meeting that occurred between Apple and Samsung. This includes discussion of the Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK -1DECLARATION OF AUSTIN TARANGO IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL 1 September 2010 meeting between Samsung and Apple, as well as the other meetings discussed by 2 Mr. Richard Lutton in his deposition. Pursuant to General Order No. 62, a copy of the Reply has 3 been lodged with the Court for in camera review, served on all parties, and will be e-filed with the 4 Court pending the Court's granting of this Motion to Seal. 5 7. The following portions of Samsung's Reply have been properly filed under seal: 6 Lines 18-20 and 22-24 on page 12, and lines 7-10 and 11-14 on page 14. 7 8. On August 8, 2011, I e-mailed counsel for Apple, Inc. (“Apple”) requesting that 8 Apple agree to the filing under seal of information pertaining to the settlement meetings between 9 Apple and Samsung, as well as portions of the Lutton Tr. that had been marked HIGHLY 10 CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY and also discussed the Apple Samsung meetings 11 in detail. In response to this email, Apple's counsel agreed to not oppose Samsung's 12 Administrative Motion to file this information under seal. 13 14 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is 15 true and correct. Executed in Redwood Shores, CA on August 8, 2011. 16 17 18 By /s/ Austin Tarango Austin Tarango 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK -2DECLARATION OF AUSTIN TARANGO IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?