Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
148
Declaration of Austin Tarango in Support of #147 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed bySamsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Related document(s) #147 ) (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 8/8/2011)
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151)
2 charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
3 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 875-6600
4 Facsimile: (415) 875-6700
5 Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129)
kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com
6 Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603)
victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com
th
7 555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5 Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065
8 Telephone: (650) 801-5000
Facsimile: (650) 801-5100
9
Edward DeFranco (Cal. Bar No.165596)
10 eddefranco@quinnemanuel.com
51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
11 New York, New York 10010
Telephone: (212) 849-7000
12 Facsimile: (212) 849-7100
13 Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417)
michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com
14 865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017
15 Telephone: (213) 443-3000
Facsimile: (213) 443-3100
16
Attorneys for Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
17 and Samsung Telecommunications America LLC
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
19
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
20
21
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,
22
23
DECLARATION OF AUSTIN TARANGO
IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
vs.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
24 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
25 York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
26 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
27
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK
Date: August 24, 2011
Time: 2:00 pm
Place: Courtroom 4, 5th Floor
Judge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh
Defendants.
28
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
DECLARATION OF AUSTIN TARANGO IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
1
I, Austin Tarango, declare:
2
1.
I am an associate in the law firm of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP,
3 counsel for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung
4 Telecommunications America, LLC. I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this
5 declaration and, if called upon as a witness, I could and would testify to such facts under oath.
6
2.
The confidential version of the Declaration of Eunha Kim In Support of Samsung’s
7 Reply In Support of its Motion to Disqualify Bridges & Mavrakakis LLP (the “Kim Reply
8 Declaration”) contains confidential, non-public information regarding a settlement meeting that
9 occurred between Apple and Samsung in or about September 2010. Pursuant to General Order
10 No. 62, a copy of the Declaration has been lodged with the Court for in camera review, served on
11 all parties, and will be e-filed with the Court pending the Court's granting of this Motion to Seal.
12
3.
The following portions of the Kim Reply Declaration have been properly filed
13 under seal: Paragraphs 5-6.
14
4.
Exhibit F of the Tarango Reply Declaration contains excerpts from the deposition
15 of Mr. Richard Lutton (the “Lutton Tr.”). Apple has designated this deposition HIGHLY
16 CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY under the interim protective order. These
17 deposition excerpts also relate to the settlement meetings between Samsung and Apple and include
18 detailed, confidential, and non-public information regarding discussions that took place at these
19 meetings between Apple and Samsung. Pursuant to General Order No. 62, a copy of Exhibit F has
20 been lodged with the Court for in camera review, served on all parties, and will be e-filed with the
21 Court pending the Court's granting of this Motion to Seal.
22
5.
Given that Apple designated Mr. Lutton's deposition testimony HIGHLY
23 CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY, and his testimony reveals confidential
24 information regarding the settlement meetings between Samsung and Apple, the entire transcript
25 provided in Exhibt F is properly filed under seal.
26
6.
The confidential version of Samsung's Reply In Support of Its Motion to Disqualify
27 Bridges & Mavrakakis LLP. (“Reply”) contains confidential, non-public information regarding a
28 settlement meeting that occurred between Apple and Samsung. This includes discussion of the
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-1DECLARATION OF AUSTIN TARANGO IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
1 September 2010 meeting between Samsung and Apple, as well as the other meetings discussed by
2 Mr. Richard Lutton in his deposition. Pursuant to General Order No. 62, a copy of the Reply has
3 been lodged with the Court for in camera review, served on all parties, and will be e-filed with the
4 Court pending the Court's granting of this Motion to Seal.
5
7.
The following portions of Samsung's Reply have been properly filed under seal:
6 Lines 18-20 and 22-24 on page 12, and lines 7-10 and 11-14 on page 14.
7
8.
On August 8, 2011, I e-mailed counsel for Apple, Inc. (“Apple”) requesting that
8 Apple agree to the filing under seal of information pertaining to the settlement meetings between
9 Apple and Samsung, as well as portions of the Lutton Tr. that had been marked HIGHLY
10 CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY and also discussed the Apple Samsung meetings
11 in detail. In response to this email, Apple's counsel agreed to not oppose Samsung's
12 Administrative Motion to file this information under seal.
13
14
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is
15 true and correct. Executed in Redwood Shores, CA on August 8, 2011.
16
17
18
By /s/ Austin Tarango
Austin Tarango
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-2DECLARATION OF AUSTIN TARANGO IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?