Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1487

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Re Apple's Response to Samsung's Motion for Reconsideration Regarding Slides 11-19 filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 7/30/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)
[e-mail]
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)
[e-mail]
RACHEL KREVANS (CA SBN 116421)
[e-mail]
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368)
[e-mail]
ALISON M. TUCHER (CA SBN 171363)
[e-mail]
RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)
[e-mail]
JASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

WILLIAM F. LEE
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180)
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC

12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

SAN JOSE DIVISION

16
17

APPLE INC., a California corporation,

18
19
20
21
22

Plaintiff,
v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York
corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company,

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
APPLE INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS
UNDER SEAL RE: APPLE’S RESPONSE
TO SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION REGARDING
SLIDES 11-19

23
Defendants.
24
25
26
27
28
APPLE INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3176834

1

In accordance with Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5, and General Order No. 62,

2

Apple Inc. (“Apple”) submits this motion for an order to seal the confidential, unredacted version

3

of

4



5
6
7

The Declaration of Jason R. Bartlett in Support of Apple’s Response to Samsung’s
Motion for Reconsideration Regarding Slides 11-19 (“Bartlett Decl.”);



Exhibits 1-3 to the Bartlett Decl.

Apple submits this motion only because we are required to do so by this Court’s

8

protective order. The Bartlett Decl. and Exhibit 1-3 thereto contain information that Samsung has

9

designated as highly confidential. Apple conferred with Samsung today in an attempt to avoid

10

this motion, and provided Samsung with details of the information in our submission. Samsung

11

refused to relieve us of the duty of filing this motion. In light of the Court’s clear statement that

12

only compelling reasons will now permit the sealing of materials in this case, Samsung’s decision

13

seems nothing more than a bad faith attempt to delay public review of the evidence in this case.

14

Apple infers Samsung intends to file a declaration seeking to establish that “compelling reasons”

15

permit the sealing of these materials. See Civ. Local R. 79-5(d).

16
17

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(c), Apple will lodge with the Clerk the Bartlett Decl.
and Exhibits 1-3.

18
19

Dated: July 30, 2012

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

20
21
22
23

By:

/s/ Jason R. Bartlett ________
Jason R. Bartlett
Attorney for Plaintiff
APPLE INC.

24
25
26
27
28
APPLE INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3176834

1