Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1510

ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting in part and denying in part 1463 Motion for Reconsideration (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN JOSE DIVISION

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

APPLE, INC., a California corporation,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., A
)
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
)
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York )
corporation; SAMSUNG
)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, )
a Delaware limited liability company,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)

Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK
ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS FOR
RECONSIDERATION REGARDING
OBJECTIONS TO OPENING SLIDES

18
Regarding Apple’s motion for reconsideration of the Court’s rulings on objections to
19
opening slides:
20
21



Slide 32: The objection to slide 32 is overruled.



Slide 18: The objection to slide 18 is overruled because Apple has adopted Samsung’s

22
translation.
23
Regarding Samsung’s motion for reconsideration of the Court’s rulings on objections to
24
opening statements:
25



Slide 20-22: The objection to slides 20-21 is sustained. Samsung’s motion for

26
reconsideration is denied as to these two slides. The objection to slide 22 is sustained in
27
part and overruled in part. The Howarth e-mail and the photo were not stricken by Judge
28

1
Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK
ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION REGARDING OBJECTIONS TO OPENING
SLIDES

1

Grewal and are admissible to show functionality. The title of slide 22 must be changed to

2

address only functionality.

3



4
5

reconsideration is denied.


6
7

Slide 51: The objection to slide 51 is overruled. Samsung’s motion for reconsideration is
granted because the theory was timely disclosed. See ECF No. 172.



8
9

Slide 11-19: The objection to slides 11-19 is sustained. Samsung’s motion for

Slide 29: The objection to slide 29 is sustained. Samsung’s motion for reconsideration is
denied.



Slide 9: The objection to slide 9 is sustained. Samsung’s motion for reconsideration is

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

denied.

11

IT IS SO ORDERED.

12

Dated: July 30, 2012

_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK
ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION REGARDING OBJECTIONS TO OPENING
SLIDES