Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1514

JOINT STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING UPDATED DAMAGES OPINIONS AND EXHIBITS filed by Apple Inc.. (Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 7/30/2012) Modified text on 7/31/2012 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781) hmcelhinny@mofo.com MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664) mjacobs@mofo.com RACHEL KREVANS (CA SBN 116421) rkrevans@mofo.com JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368) jtaylor@mofo.com ALISON M. TUCHER (CA SBN 171363) atucher@mofo.com RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425) rhung@mofo.com JASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530) jasonbartlett@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: (415) 268-7000 Facsimile: (415) 268-7522 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151) 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-6600 Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129) Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603) 555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5th Floor Redwood Shores, California 94065 Telephone: (650) 801-5000 Facsimile: (650) 801-5100 Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417) 865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: (213) 443-3000 Facsimile: (213) 443-3100 Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 SAN JOSE DIVISION 16 17 APPLE INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., A Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company., Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG) JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING UPDATED DAMAGES OPINIONS AND EXHIBITS Defendants. 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE UPDATED DAMAGES OPINIONS AND EXHIBITS CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG) sf-3176383 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Additional attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC. WILLIAM F. LEE william.lee@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 60 State Street Boston, MA 02109 Telephone: (617) 526-6000 Facsimile: (617) 526-5000 MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180) mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 950 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 858-6000 Facsimile: (650) 858-6100 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE UPDATED DAMAGES OPINIONS AND EXHIBITS Case No. 4:11-cv-01846-LHK sf-3176383 2 1 WHEREAS on Wednesday evening, July 25, 2012, Apple and Samsung by agreement 2 exchanged documents reflecting financial results updated for periods between April and 3 June 2012 (referred to as “Updated Financial Results”). 4 5 WHEREAS Apple and Samsung by agreement exchanged damages calculations revised to reflect the Updated Financial Results in the afternoon and evening of July 28, 2012. 6 WHEREAS Apple and Samsung by agreement exchanged updated plaintiff’s and 7 defendant’s exhibits that incorporate the Updated Financial Results in the afternoon and evening 8 of July 28, 2012. 9 10 11 WHEREAS the Updated Financial Results are relevant to claims for monetary relief at trial. WHEREAS after May 12, 2012, actions of the parties and orders entered by the Court 12 have changed the intellectual property being asserted and the products being accused (referred to 13 as “Changes to the Intellectual Property Claims”). 14 WHEREAS the materials exchanged on July 28 were revised to reflect the Changes to the 15 Intellectual Property Claims. 16 NOW THEREFORE the parties stipulate as follows: 17 1. Neither party will object to the opinions of the opposing party’s damages expert because it 18 includes the Updated Financial Results or the Changes to the Intellectual Property Claims. 19 2. The parties agree that the sponsoring party may substitute the following plaintiff’s and 20 defendants’ trial exhibits, updated to reflect the Updated Financial Results or Changes to 21 the Intellectual Property Claims, as exchanged on or since Wednesday, July 25, 2012: 22 PX25, PX102, PX103, PX180, PX181, DX676, DX703, DX704, DX781. Neither party 23 will object to the updated versions on the ground that they include Updated Financial 24 Results or Changes to the Intellectual Property Claims. 25 3. All other objections to the content of the experts’ opinions and the admission of exhibits 26 are preserved. By this stipulation, neither party agrees to the admission of the exhibits 27 identified in paragraph 2. 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE UPDATED DAMAGES OPINIONS AND EXHIBITS CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG) sf-3176383 3 1 2 Dated: July 30, 2012 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP By: /s/ Michael A. Jacobs HAROLD J. MCELHINNY MICHAEL A. JACOBS JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR ALISON M. TUCHER RICHARD S.J. HUNG JASON R. BARTLETT By: /s/ Victoria F. Maroulis____________ CHARLES K. VERHOEVEN KEVIN P.B. JOHNSON VICTORIA F. MAROULIS EDWARD DEFRANCO MICHAEL T. ZELLER 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 WILLIAM F. LEE MARK D. SELWYN Attorneys for APPLE INC. Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., AND SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE UPDATED DAMAGES OPINIONS AND EXHIBITS CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG) sf-3176383 4 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 Based on the foregoing stipulation, 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 Dated: July _____, 2012 5 6 7 HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE UPDATED DAMAGES OPINIONS AND EXHIBITS CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG) sf-3176383 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?