Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
154
Proposed Order re #153 MOTION to Dismiss and Strike Apple's Counterclaims by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 8/15/2011) Modified text on 8/27/2011 (dhm, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
10
11
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,
12
13
vs.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
14 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
15 York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
16 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
17
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK
Defendants.
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND
STRIKE APPLE’S COUNTERCLAIMS
Date: September 22, 2011
Time: 1:30 pm
Place: Courtroom 4, 5th Floor
Judge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND
STRIKE APPLE’S COUNTERCLAIMS
1
The Court, having considered the moving, opposition, and reply papers, including evidence
2 submitted therewith, applicable law, argument by counsel, and all other matters presented to this
3 Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Strike Apple’s Counterclaims, and good cause
4 having been shown, HEREBY ORDERS that:
5
1.
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Counts XXVII, XXVIII, and XXIX of Apple Inc.’s
6 Counterclaims in Reply is GRANTED;
7
2.
Defendant’s Motion to Strike Counts XXX, XXXI, and XXXII of Apple Inc.’s
8 Counterclaims in Reply is GRANTED.
9
10
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
14 DATED:
_________________, 2011
15
16
17
Hon. Lucy H .Koh
United States District Court Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND
STRIKE APPLE’S COUNTERCLAIMS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?