Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 154

Proposed Order re #153 MOTION to Dismiss and Strike Apple's Counterclaims by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 8/15/2011) Modified text on 8/27/2011 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION 10 11 APPLE INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, 12 13 vs. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a 14 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New 15 York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, 16 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 17 CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK Defendants. [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND STRIKE APPLE’S COUNTERCLAIMS Date: September 22, 2011 Time: 1:30 pm Place: Courtroom 4, 5th Floor Judge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND STRIKE APPLE’S COUNTERCLAIMS 1 The Court, having considered the moving, opposition, and reply papers, including evidence 2 submitted therewith, applicable law, argument by counsel, and all other matters presented to this 3 Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and Strike Apple’s Counterclaims, and good cause 4 having been shown, HEREBY ORDERS that: 5 1. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Counts XXVII, XXVIII, and XXIX of Apple Inc.’s 6 Counterclaims in Reply is GRANTED; 7 2. Defendant’s Motion to Strike Counts XXX, XXXI, and XXXII of Apple Inc.’s 8 Counterclaims in Reply is GRANTED. 9 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 14 DATED: _________________, 2011 15 16 17 Hon. Lucy H .Koh United States District Court Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK -1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND STRIKE APPLE’S COUNTERCLAIMS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?