Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1552

NOTICE by Apple Inc. NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF EXHIBIT G TO DECLARATION OF MICHEL MAHARBIZ IN SUPPORT OF APPLE'S OPPOSITION TO SAMSUNG'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT UNDER L.R. 79-5(E) (Bartlett, Jason) (Filed on 8/2/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)
[e-mail]
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)
[e-mail]
RACHEL KREVANS (CA SBN 116421)
[e-mail]
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368)
[e-mail]
ALISON M. TUCHER (CA SBN 171363)
[e-mail]
RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)
[e-mail]
JASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

WILLIAM F. LEE
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180)
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

SAN JOSE DIVISION

16
17

APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,

18
19
20
21
22

v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York
corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company,

23

Defendants.

24
25
26
27
28
NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF EXHIBIT UNDER L.R. 79-5(E)
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK

sf-3178462

Case No.

11-cv-01846-LHK

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF
EXHIBIT G TO DECLARATION
OF MICHEL MAHARBIZ IN
SUPPORT OF APPLE’S
OPPOSITION TO SAMSUNG’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT UNDER L.R. 79-5(E)

1

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79-5(e), Apple hereby withdraws Exhibit G to the

2

Declaration of Michel Maharbiz in Support of Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s Motion for

3

Summary Judgment (“Exhibit G”).

4

L.R. 79-5(e) specifies that if a motion to seal is denied, “the submitting party may retain

5

the document and not make it part of the record in the case[.]” See also Tessera, Inc. v.

6

Qualcomm, Inc., No. C 12-692 CW, 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85669, at *7 (N.D. Cal. June 20,

7

2012) (denying motion to seal and ordering party to file in public record or withdraw exhibit);

8

Centrify Corp. v. Quest Software, Inc., No. C 10-3873 CW, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148061, at *3

9

(N.D. Cal. Dec. 23, 2011) (same). Apple filed a motion to seal Exhibit G on June 1, 2012 (Dkt.

10

No. 1013), which the Court denied on July 17, 2012 with leave to file a renewed motion to seal

11

(Dkt. No. 1256.) Exhibit G is no longer relevant to the case, as it pertained to claims which have

12

been voluntarily dismissed (Dkt. No. 1178.) Apple, as the submitting party, will retain the

13

document and not make it a part of the record in the case.

14

Dated: August 2, 2012

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

15
By:

16
17

/s/ Jason R. Bartlett
JASON R. BARTLETT
Attorneys for Plaintiff
APPLE INC.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF EXHIBIT UNDER L.R. 79-5(E)
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK

sf-3178462