Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1555

NOTICE by Apple Inc. re 1539 Response ( Non Motion ), Notice of Correction (Selwyn, Mark) (Filed on 8/2/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6

HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)
[e-mail]
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)
[e-mail]
RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

7
8
9

WILLIAM F. LEE (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
60 State Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180)
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim-Defendant Apple Inc.

10
11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,
vs.

Civil Action No. 11-CV-01846-LHK

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity, SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation, and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
Defendants.

NOTICE OF CORRECTION TO
APPLE INC.’S RESPONSE TO
DECLARATION OF JOHN B. QUINN
AND RECOMMENDATION
REGARDING APPROPRIATE
SANCTION

24

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity, SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation, and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
Counterclaim-Plaintiffs,
v.

25

APPLE INC., a California corporation,

21
22
23

26

Counterclaim-Defendant.

27
28
NOTICE OF CORRECTION
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

1
2

Apple Inc. submits the following correction to Apple Inc.’s Response to Declaration of
John B. Quinn and Recommendation Regarding Appropriate Sanction (“Apple’s Response”):

3
4

Page 4, lines 6-9 of Apple’s Response currently reads:

5

Although Mr. Quinn stated that he was simply responding to requests for explanation

6

from the media, at least one reporter who received Samsung’s press statement wrote that

7

she had never made any such request.

8
9

That sentence should be revised as follows:

10

Although Mr. Quinn stated that he was simply responding to requests for explanation

11

from the media, at least one reporter who received Samsung’s press statement wrote that

12

he had never made any such request.

13
14

Dated: August 2, 2012

/s/ Mark D. Selwyn
Mark D. Selwyn

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-

NOTICE OF CORRECTION
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

2

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document has

3

been served on August 2, 2012 to all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to

4

electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Civil Local Rule 5.4.

5
6

/s/ Mark D. Selwyn
Mark D. Selwyn

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

NOTICE OF CORRECTION
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)