Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1588

Declaration of RICHARD S.J. HUNG in Support of 1587 Objection filed byApple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E)(Related document(s) 1587 ) (Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 8/6/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781) hmcelhinny@mofo.com MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664) mjacobs@mofo.com RACHEL KREVANS (CA SBN 116421) rkrevans@mofo.com JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368) jtaylor@mofo.com ALISON M. TUCHER (CA SBN 171363) atucher@mofo.com RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425) rhung@mofo.com JASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530) jasonbartlett@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: (415) 268-7000 Facsimile: (415) 268-7522 WILLIAM F. LEE william.lee@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 60 State Street Boston, MA 02109 Telephone: (617) 526-6000 Facsimile: (617) 526-5000 MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180) mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 950 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 858-6000 Facsimile: (650) 858-6100 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 SAN JOSE DIVISION 16 17 APPLE INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, 18 19 20 21 22 v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 23 Case No. DECLARATION OF RICHARD S.J. HUNG IN SUPPORT OF APPLE’S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES REGARDING DAY 4 EXAMINATION DISCLOSURES Defendants. 24 25 26 27 28 HUNG DECL. ISO APPLE’S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES REGARDING DAY 4 DISCLOSURES CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK sf-3179471 11-cv-01846-LHK 1 I, RICHARD S.J. HUNG, declare as follows: 2 1. I am a partner in the law firm of Morrison & Foerster LLP, counsel for Apple Inc. 3 (“Apple”). I am licensed to practice law in the State of California and admitted to practice 4 before this Court. I have personal knowledge of the matters stated herein or understand them to 5 be true from members of my litigation team. I make this declaration in support of Apple’s 6 Objections and Responses Regarding Day 4 Examination Disclosures. 7 2. Attached to this declaration as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of Exhibit 2 to 8 the Expert Report of Jeffrey Johnson, Ph.D. Regarding Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 9 7,469,381. 10 11 12 3. Attached to this declaration as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of the Expert Report of Russell S. Winer. 4. Attached to this declaration as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of excerpts to 13 Apple Inc.’s Corrected Amended Objections and Responses to Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.’s 14 Interrogatory Nos. 4, 6, 7, 16, 17, 18 to Apple Inc. 15 16 17 18 19 20 5. Attached to this declaration as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of Samsung’s Objections and Responses to Apple’s Eleventh Rule 30(B)(6) Deposition Notice. 6. Attached to this declaration as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of excerpts of Ravin Balakrishnan’s March 22, 2012 expert report. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this 6th day of August, 2012 at San Jose, California. 21 /s/ Richard S.J. Hung Richard S.J. Hung 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 HUNG DECL. ISO APPLE’S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES REGARDING DAY 4 DISCLOSURES CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK sf-3179471 1 1 2 ATTESTATION I, Michael A. Jacobs, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 3 Declaration. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Richard S.J. Hung 4 has concurred in this filing. 5 Dated: August 6, 2012 /s/ Michael A. Jacobs Michael A. Jacobs 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 HUNG DECL. ISO APPLE’S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES REGARDING DAY 4 DISCLOSURES CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK sf-3179471 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?