Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1594

MOTION for Leave to File REPLY TO 1556 REUTERS AMERICA LLC'S OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS TO SEAL TRIAL AND PRETRIAL EVIDENCE filed by Motorola Mobility LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Jennifer A. Golinveaux, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Proposed Order, # 4 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Golinveaux, Jennifer) (Filed on 8/6/2012) Modified on 8/7/2012 linking entry to document #1556 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

DAVID S. BLOCH (SBN: 184530)
[e-mail]
JENNIFER A. GOLINVEAUX (SBN: 203056)
[e-mail]
MARCUS T. HALL (SBN: 206495)
[e-mail]
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
101 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-5894
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
PETER J. CHASSMAN (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
1111 Louisiana St., 25th Floor
Houston, TX 77002-5242
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Non-Party,
MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

SAN JOSE DIVISION

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

APPLE, INC., a California Corporation,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
)
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
)
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York )
corporation; SAMSUNG
)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a )
Delaware limited liability company,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)

CASE NO.: 11-CV-01846-LHK

NON-PARTY MOTOROLA
MOBILITY LLC’S MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE REPLY TO
REUTERS AMERICA LLC’S
OPPOSITION TO MOTIONS TO
SEAL TRIAL AND PRETRIAL
EVIDENCE
Date: Expedited Request
Courtroom: 8, 4th Floor
Judge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh

26
27
28
NONPARTY MOTOROLA’S MOT’N FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY TO REUTERS AMERICA LLC’S OPP. TO MOT’NS TO SEAL
Case No. 11-CV-01846-LHK

1

Non-Party Motorola Mobility LLC respectfully requests leave to file a reply to address

2

Reuters America LLC’s Opposition to Motions to Seal Trial and Pretrial Evidence. As set forth

3

in Motorola’s reply, attached as Exhibit A to the declaration of Jennifer A. Golinveaux filed

4

herewith, Reuter’s fails to rebut the particularized document-by-document showing of the harm

5

that would result from disclosure of the Motorola confidential information that was the subject of

6

Motorola’s motion. Instead of refuting the facts and specific concerns of the non-parties at hand,

7

Reuters relies on a joint declaration of five college professors who do not even purport to know

8

the facts of the situation (Dkt. No. 1556-4). Even Reuters’ declarants “recognize and respect the

9

value of confidentiality with respect to licensing data.”

10
11

In light of Reuter’s inadequate argument directed at Motorola’s administrative motion to
seal, Motorola respectfully requests leave to file a short reply to address this argument.

12
13

Dated: August 6, 2012

WINSTON & STRAWN LLP

14
15
16
17
18

By: /s/ Jennifer A. Golinveaux
David S. Bloch
Jennifer A. Golinveaux
Marcus T. Hall
Peter J. Chassman (admitted pro hac vice)
Attorneys for Non-Party,
MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1NONPARTY MOTOROLA’S MOT’N FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY TO REUTERS AMERICA LLC’S OPP. TO MOT’NS TO SEAL
Case No. 11-CV-01846-LHK