Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1607

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Documents Re Apple's Objections and Responses Re Singh Examination Materials filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 APPLE'S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO OBJECTIONS REGARDING PROPOSED EXAMINATION MATERIALS FOR KARAN SINGH, # 2 Declaration OF JASON BARTLETT, # 3 Proposed Order)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 8/7/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 13 APPLE INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, 14 15 v. 18 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean corporation; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 19 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLE INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL RE APPLE’S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES RE SINGH EXAMINATION MATERIALS Defendants. 16 17 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING APPLE’S MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG) sf-3180080 1 In accordance with Civil L.R. 7-11 and 79-5, and General Order No. 62, Apple Inc. 2 (“Apple”) has filed an administrative motion for an order to seal portions of the following 3 documents: 4 1. Exhibit A to the Declaration of Jason R. Bartlett in Support of Apple’s Objections 5 and Responses re: Singh Examination Materials (“Bartlett Declaration”). 6 Having considered the arguments and the papers submitted, and GOOD CAUSE 7 HAVING BEEN SHOWN, the Court hereby GRANTS Apple’s Administrative Motion to File 8 Under Seal. The above-referenced documents shall be filed under seal. 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: ____ _, 2012 By: Honorable Paul S. Grewal United States Magistrate Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING APPLE’S MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG) sf-3180080

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?