Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
1607
Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Documents Re Apple's Objections and Responses Re Singh Examination Materials filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 APPLE'S OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO OBJECTIONS REGARDING PROPOSED EXAMINATION MATERIALS FOR KARAN SINGH, # 2 Declaration OF JASON BARTLETT, # 3 Proposed Order)(Jacobs, Michael) (Filed on 8/7/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
13
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,
14
15
v.
18
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; and
SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company,
19
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
APPLE INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS
UNDER SEAL RE APPLE’S
OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES RE
SINGH EXAMINATION
MATERIALS
Defendants.
16
17
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING APPLE’S MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3180080
1
In accordance with Civil L.R. 7-11 and 79-5, and General Order No. 62, Apple Inc.
2
(“Apple”) has filed an administrative motion for an order to seal portions of the following
3
documents:
4
1. Exhibit A to the Declaration of Jason R. Bartlett in Support of Apple’s Objections
5
and Responses re: Singh Examination Materials (“Bartlett Declaration”).
6
Having considered the arguments and the papers submitted, and GOOD CAUSE
7
HAVING BEEN SHOWN, the Court hereby GRANTS Apple’s Administrative Motion to File
8
Under Seal. The above-referenced documents shall be filed under seal.
9
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: ____
_, 2012
By:
Honorable Paul S. Grewal
United States Magistrate Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING APPLE’S MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3180080
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?