Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1615

Joinder InterDigital's Joinder in Third Party Replies to Reuters' Supplemental Opposition to Third Party Motions to Seal by InterDigital Communications LLC, InterDigital Technology Corporation. (Cacovean, Corina) (Filed on 8/8/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 MICHAEL B. LEVIN (SBN: 172329) mlevin@wsgr.com DYLAN J. LIDDIARD (SBN: 203055) dliddiard@wsgr.com WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 650 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050 Telephone: (650) 493-9300 Facsimile: (650) 565-5100 Attorneys for Non-Parties INTERDIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION and INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN JOSE DIVISION 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 APPLE, INC., a California Corporation, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a ) Korean corporation; SAMSUNG ) ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York ) corporation; SAMSUNG ) TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a ) Delaware limited liability company, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: 11-CV-01846-LHK INTERDIGITAL’S JOINDER IN THIRD PARTY REPLIES TO REUTERS’ SUPPLEMENTAL OPPOSITION TO THIRD PARTY MOTIONS TO SEAL 24 25 26 27 28 -1INTERDIGITAL’S JOINDER IN THIRD PARTY REPLIES Case No. 11-CV-01846-LHK 1 Non-parties InterDigital Technology Corporation and InterDigital Communications, LLC 2 (collectively, “InterDigital”) join in the replies filed by Motorola (Dkt. No. 1594) and Nokia 3 (Dkt. No. 1609) in connection with Reuters America LLC’s Opposition to Motions to Seal Trial 4 and Pretrial Evidence (Dkt. No. 1556). 5 Specifically, InterDigital respectfully submits that, as already noted in Motorola’s and 6 Nokia’s replies, Reuters’ opposition is misplaced because: (1) it is contrary to the law of the 7 Ninth Circuit and the overwhelming majority of courts; (2) it improperly lumps together 8 arguments against Samsung’s, Apple’s and all the third parties’ motions to seal in a single 9 opposition that fails to address on an individualized basis whether each of the third parties’ 10 requests to seal meets the compelling reasons standard; (3) it illogically argues that the 11 inadvertent disclosure of IBM’s and Qualcomm’s agreements with Samsung and a court-ordered 12 “exacting and even-handed” disclosure of confidential terms of the third parties’ licenses (the 13 practical possibility of which is highly questionable) somehow moots the third parties’ 14 competitive harm concerns; and (4) it relies on declarants that do not purport to know or address 15 facts particular to of each of the third parties that were thrust into this litigation (Dkt. No. 1556- 16 4). If anything, the Reuters declarants confirm that licensing terms are trade secrets when they 17 state that they “recognize and respect the value of confidentiality with respect to licensing data.” 18 Id. ¶ 7. 19 In addition, InterDigital emphasizes that its motion to seal and its proposed redactions of 20 licensing terms are narrowly tailored to protect only competitively sensitive business 21 information. Because Reuters failed to refute nonparty InterDigital’s showing of compelling 22 reasons for sealing its confidential licensing terms, InterDigital respectfully requests that the 23 Court grant InterDigital’s motion to seal. 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: August 8, 2012 Respectfully submitted, WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation -2INTERDIGITAL’S JOINDER IN THIRD PARTY REPLIES CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK 1 2 3 4 By: /s/ Michael B. Levin Michael B. Levin Attorneys for Non-Parties INTERDIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION and INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3INTERDIGITAL’S JOINDER IN THIRD PARTY REPLIES CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK 1 ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE 2 I, Corina I. Cacovean, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file 3 this Motion. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Michael B. Levin 4 has concurred in this filing. 5 6 7 Dated: August 8, 2012 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI Professional Corporation 8 /s/ Corina I. Cacovean Corina I. Cacovean 9 10 11 Attorneys for Non-Parties INTERDIGITAL TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION and INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4INTERDIGITAL’S JOINDER IN THIRD PARTY REPLIES CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?