Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
1615
Joinder InterDigital's Joinder in Third Party Replies to Reuters' Supplemental Opposition to Third Party Motions to Seal by InterDigital Communications LLC, InterDigital Technology Corporation. (Cacovean, Corina) (Filed on 8/8/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
MICHAEL B. LEVIN (SBN: 172329)
mlevin@wsgr.com
DYLAN J. LIDDIARD (SBN: 203055)
dliddiard@wsgr.com
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
650 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1050
Telephone: (650) 493-9300
Facsimile: (650) 565-5100
Attorneys for Non-Parties
INTERDIGITAL TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION and
INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS LLC
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN JOSE DIVISION
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
APPLE, INC., a California Corporation,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
)
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
)
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York )
corporation; SAMSUNG
)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a )
Delaware limited liability company,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO.: 11-CV-01846-LHK
INTERDIGITAL’S JOINDER IN
THIRD PARTY REPLIES TO
REUTERS’ SUPPLEMENTAL
OPPOSITION TO THIRD PARTY
MOTIONS TO SEAL
24
25
26
27
28
-1INTERDIGITAL’S JOINDER IN THIRD PARTY REPLIES
Case No. 11-CV-01846-LHK
1
Non-parties InterDigital Technology Corporation and InterDigital Communications, LLC
2
(collectively, “InterDigital”) join in the replies filed by Motorola (Dkt. No. 1594) and Nokia
3
(Dkt. No. 1609) in connection with Reuters America LLC’s Opposition to Motions to Seal Trial
4
and Pretrial Evidence (Dkt. No. 1556).
5
Specifically, InterDigital respectfully submits that, as already noted in Motorola’s and
6
Nokia’s replies, Reuters’ opposition is misplaced because: (1) it is contrary to the law of the
7
Ninth Circuit and the overwhelming majority of courts; (2) it improperly lumps together
8
arguments against Samsung’s, Apple’s and all the third parties’ motions to seal in a single
9
opposition that fails to address on an individualized basis whether each of the third parties’
10
requests to seal meets the compelling reasons standard; (3) it illogically argues that the
11
inadvertent disclosure of IBM’s and Qualcomm’s agreements with Samsung and a court-ordered
12
“exacting and even-handed” disclosure of confidential terms of the third parties’ licenses (the
13
practical possibility of which is highly questionable) somehow moots the third parties’
14
competitive harm concerns; and (4) it relies on declarants that do not purport to know or address
15
facts particular to of each of the third parties that were thrust into this litigation (Dkt. No. 1556-
16
4). If anything, the Reuters declarants confirm that licensing terms are trade secrets when they
17
state that they “recognize and respect the value of confidentiality with respect to licensing data.”
18
Id. ¶ 7.
19
In addition, InterDigital emphasizes that its motion to seal and its proposed redactions of
20
licensing terms are narrowly tailored to protect only competitively sensitive business
21
information. Because Reuters failed to refute nonparty InterDigital’s showing of compelling
22
reasons for sealing its confidential licensing terms, InterDigital respectfully requests that the
23
Court grant InterDigital’s motion to seal.
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: August 8, 2012
Respectfully submitted,
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
-2INTERDIGITAL’S JOINDER IN THIRD PARTY REPLIES
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
1
2
3
4
By: /s/ Michael B. Levin
Michael B. Levin
Attorneys for Non-Parties
INTERDIGITAL TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION and
INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3INTERDIGITAL’S JOINDER IN THIRD PARTY REPLIES
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
1
ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE
2
I, Corina I. Cacovean, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file
3
this Motion. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Michael B. Levin
4
has concurred in this filing.
5
6
7
Dated: August 8, 2012
WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
Professional Corporation
8
/s/ Corina I. Cacovean
Corina I. Cacovean
9
10
11
Attorneys for Non-Parties
INTERDIGITAL TECHNOLOGY
CORPORATION and
INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4INTERDIGITAL’S JOINDER IN THIRD PARTY REPLIES
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?