Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
1617
MOTION for Leave to File Reply to Third-Party Intervenor Reuters America LLC's Opposition to Motion to Seal Trial and Pretrial Evidence filed by Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Proposed Order)(Reichman, Courtland) (Filed on 8/8/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
MCKOOL SMITH HENNIGAN, P.C.
Courtland L. Reichman (SBN 268873)
creichman@mckoolsmith.com
303 Twin Dolphin Drive, 6th Floor
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Tel.: 650-394-1400
Fax: 650-551-9901
Attorneys for Non-Party
Telefonaktiebolaget
LM Ericsson
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
APPLE, INC., a California Corporation,
McKool Smith Hennigan P.C.
303 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 600
Redwood Shores, California 94065
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Plaintiff,
vs.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
a Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a
New York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 5:11-CV-01846-LHK
NON-PARTY TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET
LM ERICSSON’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
FILE REPLY TO THIRD- PARTY
INTERVENOR REUTERS AMERICA LLC’S
OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO SEAL
TRIAL AND PRETRIAL EVIDENCE
1
Non-Party Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (“Ericsson”) respectfully requests leave to reply
2
to Third-Party Intervenor Reuters America LLC’s (“Reuters”) Opposition to Motion to Seal Trial
3
and Pretrial Evidence (Doc. No. 1556). Ericsson’s proposed reply is attached as Exhibit A to the
4
declaration of Courtland L. Reichman filed herewith and in support of this motion. As set forth in
5
the proposed reply, Ericsson will be harmed even if all license information at issue is disclosed,
6
disclosure will not lead to market efficiency and will not improve damage determinations, and
7
Reuters failed to address Ericsson’s evidence in support of its motion. Ericsson seeks leave to
8
address these matters.
9
10
DATED: August 8, 2012
Respectively Submitted,
11
By: /s/ Courtland L. Reichman
Courtland L. Reichman
McKool Smith Hennigan, P.C.
303 Twin Dolphin Drive, 6th Fl
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
McKool Smith Hennigan P.C.
303 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 600
Redwood Shores, California 94065
12
13
14
Attorneys for Non-Party
Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Case No. 5:11-CV-01846-LHK
NON-PARTY TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON’S REPLY TO
THIRD-PARTY INTERVENOR REUTERS AMERICA LLC’S OPPOSITION
TO MOTION TO SEAL TRIAL AND PRETRIAL EVIDENCE
McKool 548832v1
1
PROOF OF SERVICE
2
3
4
5
6
7
I am employed in the County of San Mateo, State of California. I am over the age of 18
years and not a party to the within action; my business address is 303 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite
600, Redwood Shores, California 94065.
On August 8, 2012, all counsel of record who are registered ECF users are being served with
a copy of the foregoing document described as NON-PARTY TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM
ERICSSON’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY TO THIRD- PARTY
INTERVENOR REUTERS AMERICA LLC’S OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO SEAL
TRIAL AND PRETRIAL EVIDENCE via the Electronic Case Filing Program of the United
States District Court for the Northern District of California per Local Rule 5-3.3.
8
Executed on August 8, 2012, at Redwood Shores, California.
9
10
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
foregoing is true and correct.
11
McKool Smith Hennigan P.C.
303 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 600
Redwood Shores, California 94065
12
/s/ Janet Wasson
Janet Wasson
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 5:11-CV-01846-LHK
NON-PARTY TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON’S MOTION FOR LEAVE
TO FILE REPLY TO THIRD-PARTY INTERVENOR REUTERS AMERICA LLC’S
OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO SEAL TRIAL AND PRETRIAL EVIDENCE
McKool 548832v1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?