Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 163

MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages FOR SAMSUNG'S OPPOSITION TO APPLE'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 8/22/2011)

1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151)
 [e-mail]
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
 Facsimile: [phone]
 Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129)
[e-mail]
 Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603)
[e-mail]
th
 555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5 Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065
 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417)
 [e-mail]
865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
 Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: [phone]
 Facsimile: [phone]
 Attorneys for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.,
Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung
 Telecommunications America, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION




APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,




CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK

vs.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a
New York corporation; SAMSUNG

TELECOMMUNICATIONS
 AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company,

Defendants.


SAMSUNG’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO
EXCEED PAGE LIMIT IN SAMSUNG’S
OPPOSITION TO APPLE’S MOTION
FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Date: October 13, 2011
Time: 1:30 pm
Place: Courtroom 8, 4th Floor
Judge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh




Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT

1

In accordance with Northern District of California Civil Local Rule 7-11, Samsung

2 Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications
3 America, LLC (collectively “Samsung”) respectfully move the Court for leave to exceed the page
4 limit under Local Rule 7-3(a) for Samsung’s Opposition to Apple’s Motion for a Preliminary
5 Injunction (“Motion”). Apple does not oppose Samsung’s request to exceed the page limit by 15
6 pages, as reflected in Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Granting Samsung Leave to Exceed Page
7 Limit in Samsung’s Opposition to Apple’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, filed August 22,
8 2011.
9

To demonstrate that Apple is not entitled to a preliminary injunction, Samsung’s

10 opposition brief includes numerous arguments on the invalidity and non-infringement of Apple’s
11 patents that have been asserted in Apple’s complaint in this action and in Apple’s Motion.
12 Samsung’s opposition brief also includes various demonstrative images regarding products
13 relevant to those arguments. Samsung requires additional pages to be able to fully address
14 Apple’s Motion and to include these demonstrative images.
15

Samsung therefore respectfully requests that the Court grant leave to exceed the page limit

16 for its opposition brief by 15 pages.
17
18 DATED: August 22, 2011
19

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP

20
21
22
23
24
25

By /s/ Victoria F. Maroulis
Charles K. Verhoeven
Kevin P.B. Johnson
Victoria F. Maroulis
Michael T. Zeller
Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC., and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC

26
27
28
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-1SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT