Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
178
Proposed Order re #176 MOTION SAMSUNG'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO EXCLUDE ORDINARY OBSERVER OPINIONS OF APPLE EXPERT COOPER WOODRING; AND MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT FILED UNDER SEAL by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Johnson, Kevin) (Filed on 8/23/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
10
11
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK
Plaintiff,
12
13
vs.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
14 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
15 York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
16 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
17
Defendants.
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE
ORDINARY OBSERVER OPINIONS OF
APPLE EXPERT COOPER WOODRING
Date: October 13, 2011
Time: 1:30 pm
Place: Courtroom 8, 4th Floor
Judge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO
EXCLUDE ORDINARY OBSERVER OPINIONS OF COOPER WOODRING
1
The Court, having considered the moving, opposition, and reply papers, including evidence
2 submitted therewith, applicable law, argument by counsel, and all other matters presented to this
3 Court on Defendants’ Motion to Exclude Ordinary Observer Opinions of Apple Expert Cooper
4 Woodring, and good cause having been shown, HEREBY ORDERS:
5
Defendants’ Motion to Exclude Ordinary Observer Opinions of Apple Expert Cooper
6 Woodring is GRANTED.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10 DATED:
_________________, 2011
11
12
Hon. Lucy H .Koh
United States District Court Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
EXcl
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO
EXCLUDE ORDINARY OBSERVER OPINIONS OF COOPER WOODRING
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?