Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 178

Proposed Order re #176 MOTION SAMSUNG'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO EXCLUDE ORDINARY OBSERVER OPINIONS OF APPLE EXPERT COOPER WOODRING; AND MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT FILED UNDER SEAL by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Johnson, Kevin) (Filed on 8/23/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION 10 11 APPLE INC., a California corporation, CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK Plaintiff, 12 13 vs. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a 14 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New 15 York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, 16 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 17 Defendants. [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE ORDINARY OBSERVER OPINIONS OF APPLE EXPERT COOPER WOODRING Date: October 13, 2011 Time: 1:30 pm Place: Courtroom 8, 4th Floor Judge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE ORDINARY OBSERVER OPINIONS OF COOPER WOODRING 1 The Court, having considered the moving, opposition, and reply papers, including evidence 2 submitted therewith, applicable law, argument by counsel, and all other matters presented to this 3 Court on Defendants’ Motion to Exclude Ordinary Observer Opinions of Apple Expert Cooper 4 Woodring, and good cause having been shown, HEREBY ORDERS: 5 Defendants’ Motion to Exclude Ordinary Observer Opinions of Apple Expert Cooper 6 Woodring is GRANTED. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 DATED: _________________, 2011 11 12 Hon. Lucy H .Koh United States District Court Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 EXcl Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK -1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE ORDINARY OBSERVER OPINIONS OF COOPER WOODRING

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?