Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1824

Question Regarding Joint Undisputed Jury Instruction 23. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 8/18/2012. (lhklc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2012)

1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5

SAN JOSE DIVISION

6
7
8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15

APPLE, INC., a California corporation,

)
)
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant,
)
v.
)
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., A
)
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
)
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York )
corporation; SAMSUNG
)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, )
a Delaware limited liability company,
)
)
Defendants and Counterclaimants. )
)

Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK
QUESTION REGARDING JURY
INSTRUCTION NO. 23

The Court requests that the parties file a response to the question below by 8 a.m. on
Sunday, August 19, 2012.

16

Proposed Instruction No. 23 – Equitable Defenses – Equitable Estoppel. Why is the

17

equitable estoppel defense, addressed in Joint Undisputed Instruction 23, appropriate for the jury?

18

IT IS SO ORDERED.

19

Dated: August 18, 2012

_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK
QUESTION REGARDING JURY INSTRUCTION NO. 23