Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
1844
ORDER Regarding Apple's Requested Jury Instruction on Internet Access of Devices. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 8/19/2012. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/19/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
APPLE, INC., a California corporation,
)
)
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant,
)
v.
)
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., A
)
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
)
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York )
corporation; SAMSUNG
)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, )
a Delaware limited liability company,
)
)
Defendants and Counterclaimants. )
)
Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK
ORDER RE: APPLE’S REQUEST FOR
DIRECTION TO JURY REGARDING
USE OF INTERNET ON DEVICES IN
EVIDENCE DURING DELIBERATIONS
Both parties have expressed concerns about jurors’ installing updates and patches that may
15
attempt to design around the patents-in-suit on the accused devices during jury deliberations, but
16
have provided no details. By 8 a.m. Monday, August 20, 2012, each party shall file a statement
17
identifying what updates and patches in any of the accused products attempt to design around the
18
patents-in-suit. Apple asserts that such updates and patches can only be installed if the user
19
accepts them. See ECF No. 1834. Samsung states that such updates or patches can be
20
automatically or inadvertently installed. See ECF No. 1837. In its statement to be filed at 8 a.m.
21
on August 20, 2012, Samsung shall explain how such updates or patches can be automatically or
22
inadvertently installed. The parties shall also be prepared to demonstrate the installation of the
23
patches and updates of concern during the hearing tomorrow on accused products, but not the
24
actual devices that have been admitted into evidence. The Court also requests that the parties
25
provide a small ELMO type projector that the jurors can use in the jury deliberation room, so that
26
the jurors can see the accused devices simultaneously.
27
28
1
Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK
ORDER RE: APPLE’S REQUEST FOR DIRECTION TO JURY REGARDING USE OF INTERNET ON DEVICES
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
Dated: August 19, 2012
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK
ORDER RE: APPLE’S REQUEST FOR DIRECTION TO JURY REGARDING USE OF INTERNET ON DEVICES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?