Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1852

ORDER Regarding Admitted Exhibits List. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 8/19/2012. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

8

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

APPLE, INC., a California corporation,

)
)
Plaintiff and Counterdefendant,
)
v.
)
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
)
a Korean corporation;
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., )
a New York corporation;
)
SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
)
AMERICA, LLC,
)
a Delaware limited liability company,
)
)
Defendants and Counterclaimants. )

Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK
ORDER REGARDING ADMITTED
EXHIBITS LIST

19
The Court hereby files:
20
Exhibit A -- the parties’ admitted exhibits list with both a column for the parties’ summary
21
of the Court’s limiting instructions and a column for the Court’s limiting instructions.
22
Exhibit B -- the jury’s admitted exhibits list that does not contain the column for the parties’
23
summary of the Court’s limiting instructions.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
Dated: August 19, 2012

_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

26
27
28
1
Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK
ORDER REGARDING ADMITTED EXHIBITS LIST

1

EXHIBIT A

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK
ORDER REGARDING ADMITTED EXHIBITS LIST

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List

EXHIBIT
DESCRIPTION
NO.
PX
3
Apple and Samsung Smartphones
PX
4
Apple and Samsung Tablets
PX
5
Summary of Press Reports Regarding Samsung
Tablet Designs

ADMITTED
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/7/2012

Limiting Instruction

Court's Limiting Instruction

OVERRULED. AS LONG AS A LIMITING INSTRUCTION IS THAT THEY'RE
NOT OFFERED AND THEY SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED, THE
CONTENTS SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED FOR THE TRUTH, THEY'RE
ADMITTED. THE OBJECTION'S OVERRULED. (1524:22-1525:1)
These exhibits are not offered for the truth of the matter asserted and
therefore are not hearsay. Dkt. 1512 at 2:16.

Do not consider for truth of the matter asserted.
PX

6

Summary of Press Reports Regarding Samsung
Phone Designs

8/7/2012

OVERRULED. AS LONG AS A LIMITING INSTRUCTION IS THAT THEY'RE
NOT OFFERED AND THEY SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED, THE
CONTENTS SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED FOR THE TRUTH, THEY'RE
ADMITTED. THE OBJECTION'S OVERRULED. (1524:22-1525:1)
These exhibits are not offered for the truth of the matter asserted and
therefore are not hearsay. Dkt. 1512 at 2:16.

Do not consider for truth of the matter asserted.
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX

7
8
10
11
12

Photographs of accused Samsung devices
Photographs of Apple products
Design alternatives considered by Peter Bressler
iPhone and iPad Advertisements
iPhone Television Advertisements

8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012

PX

13

iPad Television Advertisements

8/3/2012

"[T]he advertisements and television programs are not being offered to prove
the truth of the matter asserted, but rather are offered to establish fame, an
element of the trade dress claim." Dkt. 1512 at 4:4-5.

PX

14

iPhone & iPad Media Clips

8/3/2012

"[T]he advertisements and television programs are not being offered to prove
the truth of the matter asserted, but rather are offered to establish fame, an
element of the trade dress claim." Dkt. 1512 at 4:4-5.

PX
PX
PX

15
16
17

Apple’s Sales of iPhone and iPad
iPhone and iPad Advertising Expenditures
Summary of iPhone and iPad News Coverage

8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012

"[T]he advertisements and television programs are not being offered to prove
the truth of the matter asserted, but rather are offered to establish fame, an
element of the trade dress claim." Dkt. 1512 at 4:4-5.
Do not consider for truth of the matter asserted.

Do not consider for truth of the matter asserted.

Do not consider for truth of the matter asserted.

SO THIS IS ADMITTED AND YOU ARE NOT TO CONSIDER THIS FOR
THE TRUTH OF WHAT'S ASSERTED IN THIS EXHIBIT. YOU CAN
CONSIDER IT OTHERWISE. (605:10-13)
"[T]hese exhibits are not being offered to prove the truth of the matter
asserted, but rather are being used to establish fame." Dkt. 1512 at 8-9.
Do not consider for truth of the matter asserted.

PX

21A

Screen captures considered by S. Kare

8/7/2012

1 of 11

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List

EXHIBIT
DESCRIPTION
ADMITTED
NO.
PX
23
Summary of Hal Poret's Secondary Meanings Surveys 8/7/2012

Limiting Instruction

Court's Limiting Instruction

NOW, AS FOR PX 23, AND PX 30.2, AND 30.5, THE 30.2 WAS THE
QUESTION THAT WAS ASKED IN THE SURVEY, 30.5 -- OH, THROUGH
30.5. SO THOSE WERE ACTUALLY THE SURVEY RESULTS AND THE
QUESTIONS THAT WERE ASKED IN THE SURVEY, AS WELL AS PX 23,
WHICH IS ALL OF THOSE COPIES OF THE PHONES AND THE TABLETS
THAT WERE ACTUALLY USED IN THE SURVEY, BOTH AS CONTROL
AND OTHERWISE, YOU MAY CONSIDER THIS SURVEY AS EVIDENCE
THAT APPLE DESIGNS HAVE ACQUIRED SECONDARY MEANING, BUT
YOU MAY NOT CONSIDER THE SURVEY AS EVIDENCE THAT THE
APPLE DESIGNS ARE FAMOUS. (1591:9-21)
"Accordingly, the jury may not apply the Poret survey findings to the issue of
fame. The Court will issue a limiting instruction that the jury may consider the
Poret survey as evidence that the Apple designs have acquired secondary
meaning, but the jury may not consider the Poret survey as evidence that the
Apple designs are famous." Dkt. 1596 at 3:19-21.
Do not consider as evidence that Apple trade dress was
famous. You may consider for some other purpose; for
example, whether or not Apple's designs acquired
secondary meaning.

PX

24

PX

25A.1

PX

28

PX
PX

30
31

PX
PX

33
34

PX

35

PX

36

PX

38

PX

40

PX

42

PX

43

PX

44

PX

46

Summary of Kent Van Liere's Association/Confusion
Surveys: photos and placeholder for videos
Summary of Apple's damages calculations [UNDER
SEAL IN PART]
Summary of Samsung’s fixed, variable, and nonproduct costs [SEALING DENIED BUT UNSEALING
STAYED PENDING APPEAL]
Summary of survey conducted by J. Hauser
Selection of Samsung source code from Bates range
SAMNDCA-C000000001 - SAMNDCA-C000009221
[UNDER SEAL]
iPhone and iPad Advertising Expenditures
Translation of Presentation: Feasibility Review on
Standalone AP Business for Smart Phone Market
Email from J. Boltello re: Additional wallpapers for
Genie
Presentation: Touch Portfolio Rollout Strategy
Recommendation Based on Consumer Insight
Presentation: Browser Zooming Methods UX
Exploration Study
Translation of Email from Bong-Hee Kim regarding
Summary of Executive-Level Meeting Supervised by
Head of Division (February 10)
Translation of Email from Hyun Kim regarding PI/P3
Division Head Design Report Meeting Minutes, dated
February 16, 2010
Translation of Email from Ki Hyun Seo regarding Team
Leader's Directives at the Executives' Meeting 2/22
(Mon)
Relative Evaluation Report on S1, iPhone, March 2,
2010 Product Engineering Team SW Verification
Group
Translation of selected pages from Presentation:
Behold3 Usability Evaluation Results
S/W Verification Group

8/10/2012
8/13/2012
8/13/2012

8/10/2012
8/10/2012

8/3/2012
8/13/2012
8/16/2012
8/7/2012
8/10/2012
8/6/2012

8/15/2012

8/15/2012

8/7/2012

8/10/2012

2 of 11

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List

EXHIBIT
DESCRIPTION
NO.
PX
52
Presentation: Samsung's Use of Apple Patents in
Smartphones

ADMITTED

Limiting Instruction

Court's Limiting Instruction

8/10/2012

PX

54

Presentation: Lessons from Apple
Boston Consulting Group

8/3/2012

PX
PX
PX

55
56
57

58

PX

59

PX

60

PX

62

Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.

"PX62 was not identified in response to Samsung's contention Interrogatory
No. 7 regarding willfulness, and therefore may not be used for this purpose.
Apple may use this exhibit for other purposes, subject to further FRE 403
balancing." (Dkt. 1563 5:23-25)

Do not consider as evidence that Samsung's conduct was
willful; however, you may consider it for some other
purpose.

SO EXHIBIT 89, WHICH IS THE DEEP DIVE DOCUMENT, MAY ONLY BE
CONSIDERED FOR PURPOSES OF SHOWING INTENT, WILLFULNESS,
AND
KNOWLEDGE AND NOT FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE. (2027:18-21).

You may only consider as evidence of knowledge,
willfulness, or intent. Do not consider for any other
purpose.

8/14/2012
8/7/2012
8/10/2012

PX

Presentation: Samsung mobile icon design for 2011
Presentation: Samsung Q4 '10 Deep Dive
Translation of selected pages from Presentation: P5
Usability Evaluation Results
S/W Verification Group 1
Email from Justin Denison regarding GS Choi's
Direction and Request to STA
Translation of Presentation: North America P4(P7510
WiFi) BBY Retail Store Visit T/F Report
Presentation: STA Competitive Situation Paradigm
Shift [SEALING DENIED BUT UNSEALING STAYED
PENDING APPEAL]
Presentation: iPhone 5 Counter Strategy

"The document is not offered for the truth of the matter asserted and
therefore is not hearsay." (Dkt. 1512 at 5:1)

PX
PX

64
66A

PX

66B

PX

69

PX

70

PX

72

PX

74

PX

78

PX

80

PX

81

PX
PX

84
89

PX

91

Video of Samsung infringement of ‘381 patent
Video of Samsung infringement of ‘915 patent:
Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 prepared by Singh
Video of Samsung infringement of ‘915 patent:
Samsung Vibrant phone prepared by Singh
2011 Wireless Smartphone Satisfatction Sture
Management Report, March 2011 [Exhibit 1594 to
Benner Deposition]
3GPP TSG-RAN WG1 Meeting #42, R1-050995
London, UK, 29 August – 2 September, 2005,
Approved Report of 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 #41 in
Athens (Athens, Greece, 09 – 13 May, 2005)
TSG-RAN WG2 Meeting #48, R2-052063, London, 29
August - 02 Sep 2005, Approved minutes of the 47
TSG-RAN WG2 meeting (Athens Greece, 09-13 May
2005)
Addendum 1 ETSI/GA 29(97)/SCM/3, Amendments to
the ETSI Interim Intellectual Property Rights Policy

8/3/2012
8/6/2012
8/3/2012

8/3/2012

8/10/2012
8/10/2012
8/10/2012
8/13/2012

8/17/2012

8/17/2012

8/17/2012

Intel Invoices to Apple (12/22/11-12/29/11) [SEALED 8/16/2012
IN PART]
Letter from SW Kim to B. Teksler, dated July 25, 2011 8/16/2012
8/17/2012
Patent Cross License Agreement between Intel and
Samsung with Amendments 1 & 2 [REDACTED]
3GPP Website Screenshots
8/17/2012
Presentation: Samsung Q1 '11 Deep Dive Continuous 8/13/2012
Tracking (5/16/08 - 04/03/11) [Exhibit 1603 to Benner
Desposition]
U.S. Patent No. 6,928,648 Wong

8/16/2012

3 of 11

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List

EXHIBIT
DESCRIPTION
ADMITTED
NO.
PX
97
U.S. Patent No. 6,819,658 - Agarwal
8/17/2012
PX
100
Japanese Patent Application No. 2002-190774 and
8/17/2012
English translation
PX
101
3GPP TSG-RAN WG2 Meeting #47 Tdoc R2-051680, 8/17/2012
Athens, Greece, May 9-13, 2005, Change Request

Limiting Instruction

Court's Limiting Instruction

Email from Juho Lee to 3GPP, dated June 18, 2004, 8/17/2012
attaching R1-040697, R1-040689, R-1040690, and R1040696
KR 10-2004-0013792 and English translation
8/16/2012
Sony Ericsson Affidavit of Lee Hill with Attachment
8/16/2012

PX

104

PX
PX
PX

112
113.4,
113.5
116

PX

117

PX
PX
PX
PX

118
119
120
121

PX
PX

122
125

Samsung ETSI IPR Statements
Sony Ericsson K700i mobile phone [Physical Device]

8/17/2012
8/16/2012

PX
PX
PX

127
128
133

How To TV ad for original iPhone
iPad Is Iconic TV ad for first-generation iPad
“Apple Waves Its Wand at the iPhone,” by David
Pogue, New York Times, January 11, 2007

8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012

Sony Ericsson Mobile Comm. AB, “Sony K700 User
Guide” (1st Ed.) March 2004
Sony Press Releases, dated March 9, 2004 and
March 21, 2004
U.S. Patent No. 6,009,336 - Harris
U.S. Patent No. 6,069,648 - Suso
U.S. Patent No. 6,690,417 - Yoshida
Source Code Files, Camera and Photos Functionality
(See Appendix 1 for Bates Numbers) [UNDER SEAL]

8/16/2012
8/16/2012
8/16/2012
8/16/2012
8/16/2012
8/16/2012

IT'S ADMITTED, AND THIS IS NOT FOR THE TRUTH OF WHAT IS
STATED IN THE ARTICLE. YOU MAY CONSIDER IT OTHERWISE.
(601:22-23; 602:3-4)
"These exhibits are not hearsay because they are not being offered to prove
the truth of the statements contained in the news articles. These exhibits are
being offered to show fame." (Dkt. 1512 at 4:19-20)
Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.

PX

134

“Testing Out the iPhone,” by Walter S. Mossberg and
Katherine Boehert, The Wall Street Journal, June 27,
2007

8/3/2012

SO THIS IS ADMITTED, BUT YOU ARE NOT TO CONSIDER THE
CONTENTS OF THIS EXHIBIT FOR THEIR TRUTH. YOU CAN
CONSIDER IT OTHERWISE. (606:21-24)
"These exhibits are not hearsay because they are not being offered to prove
the truth of the statements contained in the news articles. These exhibits are
being offered to show fame." Dkt. 1512 at 4:19-20.
Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.

PX

135

“Best Inventions of 2007,” by Lev Grossman, Time,
November 1, 2007 (including photo of cover)

8/3/2012

THIS IS ADMITTED, BUT YOU'RE NOT TO CONSIDER IT FOR THE
TRUTH OF WHAT'S ASSERTED IN THIS EXHIBIT. YOU MAY CONSIDER
IT OTHERWISE. (608:8-11)
"These exhibits are not hearsay because they are not being offered to prove
the truth of the statements contained in the news articles. These exhibits are
being offered to show fame." Dkt. 1512 at 4:19-20.
Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.

4 of 11

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List

EXHIBIT
DESCRIPTION
NO.
PX
138
“Apple Takes Big Gamble on New iPad,” by Yukari
Iwatani Kane, The Wall Street Journal, January 25,
2010

ADMITTED
8/3/2012

Limiting Instruction

Court's Limiting Instruction

YOU CANNOT CONSIDER THIS FOR THE TRUTH OF WHAT'S IN THE
ARTICLE, BUT YOU CAN CONSIDER IT OTHERWISE. (619:16-18)
"These exhibits are not hearsay because they are not being offered to prove
the truth of the statements contained in the news articles. These exhibits are
being offered to show fame." Dkt. 1512 at 4:19-20.
Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.

PX

140

“Verdict Is in on Apple iPad: It’s a Winner,” by Edward 8/3/2012
Baig, USA Today, April 2, 2010

YOU CANNOT CONSIDER THIS EXHIBIT FOR THE TRUTH OF WHAT'S
STATED IN THE EXHIBIT, BUT YOU CAN CONSIDER IT OTHERWISE.
(622:24-623:2)
"These exhibits are not hearsay because they are not being offered to prove
the truth of the statements contained in the news articles. These exhibits are
being offered to show fame." Dkt. 1512 at 4:19-20.
Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.

PX

141

“Laptop Killer? Pretty Close,” by Walter S. Mossberg, 8/3/2012
The Wall Street Journal, April 1, 2010

YOU CANNOT CONSIDER THIS EXHIBIT FOR THE TRUTH OF WHAT'S
STATED IN THE ARTICLE, BUT YOU CAN CONSIDER IT OTHERWISE.
(621:24-622:2)
These exhibits are not hearsay because they are not being offered to prove
the truth of the statements contained in the news articles. These exhibits are
being offered to show fame. Dkt. 1512 at 4:19-20.
Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.

PX

142

“Patent Office Highlights Jobs’s Innovations,” New
York Times

8/3/2012

SO YOU CANNOT CONSIDER THIS EXHIBIT FOR THE TRUTH OF
WHAT'S ASSERTED IN THE ARTICLE ITSELF, BUT YOU CAN
CONSIDER IT OTHERWISE. (610:1-4)
"Neither the exhibit nor the demonstrative is hearsay because it is not being
offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. " Dkt. 1563 at 5:13-14.
Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.

PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX

143
143.04
143.06
143.12
143.16
143.22
143.25
143.82
144
145
146
148
150
155
158A

PX
PX
PX

162
163
164

Excerpts from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY10-Q4
Excerpt from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY10-Q4
Excerpt from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY10-Q4
Excerpt from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY10-Q4
Excerpt from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY10-Q4
Excerpt from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY10-Q4
Excerpt from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY10-Q4
Excerpt from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY10-Q4
Excerpts from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY11-Q1
Excerpt from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY11-Q2
Excerpt from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY11-Q3
Nokia Lumia 800 [Physical Device]
Casio G’zOne Commando
Sony Tablet S [Physical Device]
User Interface Alternative Designs - Blackberry Torch
9850
iPhone CAD
Sketch of Phone
Phone CAD

8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/7/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012

5 of 11

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List

PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX

EXHIBIT
NO.
165
166
167
168
170
171
173

PX

174

PX

180

PX

186

PX

193

PX
PX
PX
DX
DX

194
195
210
511
518

DX

526

DX
DX

528
529

DX
DX
DX

533
539
546

DX

548

DX
DX

549
550

DX

557

DESCRIPTION

ADMITTED

Phone model 1017
Phone model 1015
Phone model 956
Phone model 961
Tablet model 1202
Tablet model 874
“Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 Wi-Fi: A Worthy Rival to
the iPad 2,” by Melissa J. Perenson; PCWorld, June 8,
2011

7/31/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
8/6/2012

“First Look: Samsung Vibrant Rips Off iPhone 3G
Design,” by Priya Ganapati, Wired, July 15, 2010
Samsung’s Financial Spreadsheet [SEALING
DENIED BUT UNSEALING STAYED PENDING
APPEAL]
Translation of email from H. T. Han regarding
"Domestig Galaxy Tab Main Horzontal Deployment
Items." dated 2010-20-27 [typo: 2010-10-27]
Juho Lee's August 12, 2004 e-mail and attachment
Samsung Proposal R1-040859 at TSG RAN WG1 #38
(Aug. 12, 2004)
Email from Sungsik Lee dated March 2, 2010
Email from Sangwook Han dated October 28, 2010
Photos of the Diamondtouch System
Japanese design patent JP D1241638 (“JP638”)
Video of LaunchTile running on an HP iPAQ device
that was shown by Bederson at the CHI Conference
and HP iPAQ device running LaunchTile
Samsung F700 [Physical Device]

8/6/2012

XNav sourcecode
Fidler, Roger. "The Tablet Newspaper Vision 1981 2010." [Ex. 266 to Fidler Dep. Tr.]
iPhone User Guide for iOS 4.2 and 4.3 Software
iPhone User Guide for iOS 5.1 Software
Bederson et al.: Pad++ A Zooming Graphical Interface
for Exploring Alternate Interface Physics
Listing of MERL DiamondTouch Mandelbrot source
code files, dated December 8, 2003 through
November 30, 2004, found on the MERL-Drive in the
folders: MERLDrive/diamondtouch/people/forlines/Mandelbrot/src/co
m/merl/diamondtouch and MERLrive/diamondtouch/people/forlines/Mandelbrot/src/com
/merl/forlines/fractal and MERL DiamondTouch Table
with Mandelbrot files
Samsung's December 14, 1998 Declaration to ETSI
Nomura Yasuhiro patent Japanese application and
translation
3GPP standard TS 25.322 version 6.4.0 (Release 6)]

Limiting Instruction

THIS IS NOT OFFERED FOR THE TRUTH OF WHAT'S IN THE ACTUAL
ARTICLE, BUT YOU CAN CONSIDER IT FOR OTHER PURPOSES.
(1080:15-18)
Not admitted for the truth of the matter asserted. (1076:2-3)

Court's Limiting Instruction

Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.
Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.

8/16/2012

8/16/2012

8/17/2012

8/13/2012
8/16/2012
8/14/2012
8/6/2012
8/13/2012

8/6/2012

THIS EXHIBIT, WHICH IS DX 526, CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED FOR
ALTERNATIVE DESIGN AND FUNCTIONALITY PURPOSES. IT CAN'T BE Do not consider as evidence of invalidity or nonCONSIDERED FOR INVALIDITY PURPOSES OR OBVIOUSNESS. (1084:1- infringement. However, you may consider as evidence of
alternative designs and functionality.
4)

8/13/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/13/2012
8/14/2012

8/17/2012
8/15/2012
8/15/2012

6 of 11

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List

EXHIBIT
DESCRIPTION
NO.
DX
561
U.S. Patent Appl. No. 60/718187 (Flynt Provisional
Application for Enhanced Portable Device Navigation
Tools); U.S. Patent No. 7,933,632 ("Flynt Patent")

8/15/2012

DX

562

March 8, 2006 email from Howarth to Ive

8/14/2012

DX

572.003

8/13/2012

DX

572.004

DX

572.077

DX

572.082

DX

578

DX

586

April 15, 2011 E-mail String, Subject: Re: IPhone v
Android Preso, with Smartphone Market Study US
January 2011 attached [Eric Jue Deposition, Ex. 14]
April 15, 2011 E-mail String, Subject: Re: IPhone v
Android Preso, with Smartphone Market Study US
January 2011 attached [Eric Jue Deposition, Ex. 14]
April 15, 2011 E-mail String, Subject: Re: IPhone v
Android Preso, with Smartphone Market Study US
January 2011 attached [Eric Jue Deposition, Ex. 14]
April 15, 2011 E-mail String, Subject: Re: IPhone v
Android Preso, with Smartphone Market Study US
January 2011 attached [Eric Jue Deposition, Ex. 14]
April 14, 2010 Apple internal email chain and meeting
agenda; subject line: "iPhone 'firsts'"
Samsung-Apple Licensing Discussion, October 5,
2010

DX
DX
DX

592
613
621A

DX

630

DX

631

DX

635A

DX
DX

635B
636

DX
DX
DX

645
647
648

ADMITTED

Limiting Instruction

Court's Limiting Instruction

IT IS ADMITTED AND I JUST HAVE ONE INSTRUCTION, AND THAT IS
THAT THE JURY MAY CONSIDER DX 562 AS TO FUNCTIONALITY, BUT
NOT AS TO INVALIDITY OR NON-INFRINGEMENT. (2606:4-7)

Do not consider as evidence of invalidity or noninfringement. However, you may consider as evidence of
functionality.

YOU MAY NOT CONSIDER THIS EVIDENCE TO PROVE OR DISPROVE
THE VALIDITY OR INVALIDITY OF THE CLAIM OR THE AMOUNT OF THE
DISPUTED CLAIM. HOWEVER, YOU MAY CONSIDER THIS EVIDENCE
FOR SOME OTHER PURPOSE, FOR EXAMPLE, WHETHER OR NOT
SAMSUNG LACKED NOTICE OF APPLE'S INFRINGEMENT CLAIMS.
(1969:15-22)

Do not consider this evidence to prove or disprove the
validity or invalidity of a claim or the amount of a disputed
claim. However, you may consider this as evidence of
whether or not Samsung lacked notice of Apple's
infringement claims.

8/13/2012

8/13/2012

8/13/2012

8/3/2012
8/10/2012

ComTech United States Report Q410
ETSI Guide on IPRs, September 1-2, 2004
Reuter Tablet Video

8/3/2012
8/17/2012
8/15/2012

Teece Expert Report of 3/22/2012 - Exs. 3A, 3B
[UNDER SEAL]
Teece Expert Report of 4/2/2012 - Exs R4A-R4E
[UNDER SEAL]
Intel Source Code for X-GOLD Processors [UNDER
SEAL]
RLC Detail Design Spec [UNDER SEAL]
Infineon X-GOLD 61x Product Specification [UNDER
SEAL]
TAB 2 [SOURCE CODE] [UNDER SEAL]
iPhone App testing including mail and photos
iPad App testing including mail and photos

8/16/2012
8/16/2012
8/15/2012
8/15/2012
8/15/2012
8/14/2012
8/16/2012
8/16/2012

7 of 11

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List

EXHIBIT
DESCRIPTION
NO.
DX
655
Files related to DiamondTouch, DTFlash, and
Tablecloth including but not limited to: TableCloth
source code:
F:\diamondtouch\people\alan\dev\Flash\classes-200506-09\tablecloth_27.fla; Screenshot of Diamond
Touch-Flash Demonstration:
F:\diamondtouch\DTFlash\DTFlash-2005-0607\index.htm TableCloth screenshot:
F:\diamondtouch\DTFlash\Dtflash-2005-06-07 (Trac
decl. Ex. 25) and MERL DiamondTouch Table with
Tablecloth files
DX
661
MERL DiamondTouch Price List and Terms and
Conditions of Sale dated 10/25/05 [Exhibit 2 to Adam
Bogue 3/9/12 Deposition]
DX
662
12/12/2005 MERL DiamondTouch table and
developers Kit Purchase Order [Exhibit 11 to Adam
Bogue 3/9/12 Deposition]
DX
676
Financial Spreadsheet [UNDER SEAL]
DX 684.001 Photographic Summary of Samsung Devices
DX
685
TSG-RAN WG1 #38, Prague, Czechs, 16th - 20th
August 2004, Power control at the maximum power
limit for E-DCH
DX
687
January 20, 2011 Apple Email regarding competitor
products
DX
693
Mandelbrot source code
DX
695
11/6/2003 email from Adam Bogue to Steve Hotelling
re: DiamondTouch
DX
696
Forlines et al., “Experiences with an Observations of
Direct-Touch Tabletops” [Bogue, Ex. 3]
DX
697
1/14/05 Bogue/Forlines email re: DiamondTouch
demos [Forlines, Ex. 7]
DX
698
10/31/05 Bogue/Forlines email re: DiamondTouch
demos [Forlines, Ex. 14]
DX
712
February 25, 2011 Internal Apple Email Regarding
Competitive Phone Tracker
DX
713
January 17, 2005 email from Alan Esenther to Chia
Shen and Adam Bogue re: DTFlash on
\\herc\diamondspace
DX
717
Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 Take-Apart
DX
727
KR30-0418547, N.B. Certified translation has unique
bates range following original
DX
728
JP D1241383, N.B. Certified translation has unique
bates range following original
DX
740
Apple's 035 Prototype Photos from D'889 File History

ADMITTED

Limiting Instruction

Court's Limiting Instruction

8/15/2012

8/13/2012

8/13/2012

8/16/2012
8/15/2012
8/15/2012

7/31/2012
8/14/2012
8/13/2012
8/13/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/15/2012
8/13/2012

8/15/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
7/31/2012

The 035 proto may be used for impeachment purposes and non-infringement
purposes. However, it is only admissible for impeachment and noninfringement and may not be used to argue invalidity. Dkt. 1519 at 2:21-22.
Apple's 035 model may not be used for non-infringement purposes. (1218:12Do not consider for non-infringement or invalidity. You
1223:2)
may consider as impeachment evidence.

8 of 11

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List

EXHIBIT
DESCRIPTION
NO.
DX
741
Apple's 035 Prototype with an authenticating
stipulation of fact

ADMITTED
7/31/2012

Limiting Instruction

Court's Limiting Instruction

The 035 proto may be used for impeachment purposes and non-infringement
purposes. However, it is only admissible for impeachment and noninfringement and may not be used to argue invalidity. Dkt. 1519 at 2:21-22.
Apple's 035 model may not be used for non-infringement purposes. (1218:12Do not consider for non-infringement or invalidity. You
1223:2)
may consider as impeachment evidence.

DX

751A

DX

753

DX
DX
DX

754.502
754.545
781

JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX

1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1007
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037

Non-infringement Video [Video]: Samsung Vibrant
phone
Consolidated Financial Statements of Samsung
Electronics Co., Ltd. and Subsidiaries as of December
31, 2011
Apple 10-K Forms, 2007-2011
Apple 10-K Forms, 2007-2011
Summaries of Samsung Profits Pursuant to FRE 1006
[SEALING DENIED BUT UNSEALING STAYED
PENDING APPEAL]
iPhone
iPhone 3G
iPhone 3GS
iPhone4
iPad
iPad2
Galaxy S (i9000)
Intercept [Physical Device]
Galaxy S Vibrant [Physical Device]
Galaxy S Captivate [Physical Device]
Galaxy S Epic 4G [Physical Device]
Galaxy S Fascinate [Physical Device]
Transform [Physical Device]
Galaxy S Mesmerize [Physical Device]
Galaxy S Continuum
Galaxy S Showcase 500 [Physical Device]
Nexus S [Physical Device]
Galaxy S 4G
Gem [Physical Device]
Galaxy Prevail [Physical Device]
Nexus S 4G [Physical Device]
Replenish [Physical Device]
Droid Charge
Indulge [Physical Device]
Infuse 4G [Physical Device]
Exhibit 4G [Physical Device]
Galaxy Ace [Physical Device]
Galaxy S II (AT&T) [Physical Device]
Galaxy S II (i9100) [Physical Device]
Galaxy S II (T-Mobile) [Physical Device]
Galaxy S II (Epic 4G Touch) [Physical Device]
Galaxy S II (Skyrocket) [Physical Device]
Galaxy Tab 7.0 [Physical Device]
Galaxy Tab 10.1 (WiFi) [Physical Device]

8/10/2012
8/16/2012

8/16/2012
8/16/2012
8/16/2012

7/31/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
8/3/2012
8/10/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/10/2012
8/6/2012
8/3/2012
8/6/2012
8/16/2012
8/3/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/10/2012
8/10/2012
8/3/2012
8/6/2012
8/3/2012
8/10/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/10/2012
8/6/2012

9 of 11

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List

EXHIBIT
DESCRIPTION
NO.
JX
1038
Galaxy Tab 10.1 (4G LTE) [Physical Device]
JX
1039
US Trademark Reg for iPhone
JX
1040
Certified copy of US D504,889, issued May 10,2005

JX
JX

1041
1042

JX

1043

JX

1044

JX

1045

JX

1046

JX

1047

JX

1048

JX

1049

JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX

1050
1051
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1060

JX

1066

JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX

1068
1069
1070
1071
1073
1074
1076
1077
1078
1081
1083
1084

ADMITTED
8/6/2012
8/7/2012
7/31/2012

Limiting Instruction

However, pursuant to Judge Grewal's Order, this evidence may not be used
to establish invalidity of the D'677 patent. Apple shall prepare a limiting
instruction. Dkt. 1519 at 2:27.

Certified copy of US D593,087, issued May 26,2009
7/31/2012
Certified copy of US D604,305, issued November 17, 8/7/2012
2009
Certified copy of US D604,305, issued November
7/31/2012
17,2009
Certified copy of US 7,844,915, issued November 30, 8/10/2012
2010
Certified copy of US 7,469,381, issued December 23, 8/10/2012
2008
Certified copy of US 7,864,163, issued January 4,
8/3/2012
2011
Certified file history of US 7,469,381, issued
8/17/2012
December 23, 2008
Certified file history of US 7,844,915, issued
8/17/2012
November 30, 2010
Certified file history of US 7,864,163, issued January 8/17/2012
4, 2011
Apple iPad 2 3G (iOS 4.x) - AT&T version
8/14/2012
Apple iPad 2 3G (iOS 5.x) - AT&T version
8/14/2012
Apple iPhone 3G (iOS 4.x)
8/14/2012
Apple iPhone 3GS (iOS 4.x)
8/14/2012
Apple iPhone 4 (iOS 4.x) - AT&T version
8/14/2012
Apple iPhone 4 (iOS 5.x) - AT&T version
8/14/2012
Apple iPod Touch (4th Gen.) (iOS 4.x)
8/14/2012
8/17/2012
File wrapper for 7,675,941 (including file histories of
U.S. Patent App. No. 11/417,219, Korean Patent App.
10-2004-0042300, Korean Patent App. 10-20040062190, Korean Patent App. 10-2004-0073552,
Korean Patent App. 10-2004-0093947, Korean Patent
App. 10-2005-0029192), Korean Patent App. 10-20050037774).
File wrapper for U.S. Patent No. 7,577,460 (including 8/17/2012
U.S. App. Nos. 11/493,754, 11/003,222, and
09/540,830 and KR App. No. 1999-11179)
U.S. Patent No. 7,456,893
8/14/2012
U.S. Patent No. 7,577,460
8/14/2012
U.S. Patent No. 7,675,941
8/15/2012
U.S. Patent No. 7,698,711
8/14/2012
U.S. Patent No. 7,447,516
8/15/2012
HP Compaq TC 1000
8/14/2012
Apple iPhone 3GS (iOS 5.x)
8/14/2012
Apple iPod Touch (4th Gen.) (iOS 5.x)
8/14/2012
Fiddler 1994 Tablet Replica
8/17/2012
U.S. Patent No. 7,327,349
8/15/2012
3GPP TS 25.214 v.6.6.0 (2005-2006)
8/15/2012
3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #41 Athens, Greece, 9- 8/17/2012
13 May 2005, Change Request

10 of 11

Court's Limiting Instruction

Do not consider this as evidence that the D'677 patent is
invalid.

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List

EXHIBIT
DESCRIPTION
ADMITTED
NO.
th
8/17/2012
JX
1085
3GPP TSG-RAN2 Meeting #47, Athens, Greece, 09 13th May 2005, Tdoc R2-051311
JX
1091
MacWorld 2007 Video
8/3/2012
JX
1093
LG Prada Phone
8/3/2012
JX

1500

PX

2011

PX

2031

PX

2227

PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX

2257
2261
2277
2278
2281
2288

DX

2517

DX

2519

DX

2522

DX

2524

DX

2525

DX

2526

STA’s & SEA’s US sales of accused products &
Apple’s sales & revenues of the accused products
Exhibit M of Samsung's Disclosure Of Asserted Claims
And Infringement Contentions
Exhibit J of Samsung's Disclosure Of Asserted Claims
And Infringement Contentions
2005-08-25 Email from Bederson to John
SanGiovanni re LAunchTiule source
Production Information
Samsung Icon Design for 2011
Pantech Hotshot
Blackberry Storm
iPhone Human Interface Guidelines
June 13, 2005 Swift File (Tablecloth/ Snapping Back)
Email 11-18-08 Haining Zhang to Isable-staff re:
Competitive Analysis
Presentation: Mini-Teardown Samsung Galaxy S (TMobile Vibrant) iPod/iPhone New Tech 8.10.10
Email 1-24-11 Eddy Cue to Tim Cook re: Why I Just
Dumped the iPad (Hing: Size Matters)
Email 10-5-05 Steve Jobs to Jony Ive, et al, re:
=?WINDOWS-1252?Q?Fwd:_Samsung=92s_SGH10_Bang_&_Olufsen_=93fas?= =?WINDOWS252?Q?hionphone=94?=
Email 11-7-06 Tony Fadell to Steve Jobs, et al, re:
Samsung Unveils New Communications Device (AP)

Limiting Instruction

Court's Limiting Instruction

This exhibit may not be considered as prior art to the D’305 patent. It may be
Do not consider this exhibit as prior art to the D'305 patent.
considered for any other purpose. (Dkt. No. 1563 at 7.)

8/13/2012
8/15/2012
8/14/2012
8/13/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/17/2012
8/17/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012

8/3/2012

Nook Color tablet [used by Van Liere as control for
survey]

8/10/2012

DX

2528

LG G2x [Physical Device]

8/10/2012

DX

2529

Motorola Zoom tablet [Physical Device]

8/10/2012

DX

2534

Motorola Atrix F159 [Physical Device]

8/10/2012

DX
DX

2557
2627

Video demonstrating two finger scrolling
3GSM Congress Trade Show Report

8/10/2012
8/15/2012

ADMITTED WITH A LIMITING INSTRUCTION THAT IT'S ADMITTED
SOLELY TO ASSESS MR. VAN LIERE'S SURVEY. IT'S ADMITTED.
(1722:4-7).

Do not consider for any purpose except to evaluate Dr.
Van Liere's survey.

I'M GOING TO GIVE A LIMITING INSTRUCTION THAT THESE ARE TO BE
CONSIDERED FOR THE PURPOSE OF EVALUATING HOW MR. PORET Do not consider for any purpose except to evaluate how
CHOSE HIS CONTROL DEVICES FOR THIS. (1671:4-7)
Mr. Poret chose his control devices.
THAT'S GOING TO BE ADMITTED WITH A LIMITING INSTRUCTION
THAT THIS IS SOLELY FOR PURPOSES OF CHALLENGING MR.
Do not consider for any purpose except to evaluate Mr.
PORET'S STUDY. (1686:2-5)
Poret's study.
I'M GOING TO GIVE A LIMITING INSTRUCTION THAT THESE ARE TO BE
CONSIDERED FOR THE PURPOSE OF EVALUATING HOW MR. PORET Do not consider for any purpose except to evaluate how
CHOSE HIS CONTROL DEVICES FOR THIS. (1671:4-7)
Mr. Poret chose his control devices.
YOU MAY NOT CONSIDER THE F700 AS EVIDENCE OF INVALIDITY OR
NON-INFRINGEMENT. YOU MAY ONLY CONSIDER THE F700 FOR
ALTERNATIVE DESIGN AND FUNCTIONALITY. THE DATE OF THE
DOCUMENT IS 2006, BUT THAT IS ACTUALLY AN INCORRECT DATE.
THE CORRECT DATE IS 2007. (2840:5-8, 2840:12-14)

11 of 11

Do not consider as evidence of invalidity or noninfringement. However, you may consider as evidence of
alternative designs and functionality. The date on the
document is incorrect. The correct date is 2007.

1

EXHIBIT B

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK
ORDER REGARDING ADMITTED EXHIBITS LIST

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List
EXHIBIT
DESCRIPTION
NO.
Apple and Samsung Smartphones
PX
3
Apple and Samsung Tablets
PX
4
Summary of Press Reports Regarding Samsung
PX
5
Tablet Designs
Summary of Press Reports Regarding Samsung
PX
6
Phone Designs
Photographs of accused Samsung devices
PX
7
Photographs of Apple products
PX
8
Design alternatives considered by Peter Bressler
PX
10
iPhone and iPad Advertisements
PX
11
iPhone Television Advertisements
PX
12

ADMITTED

Court's Limiting Instruction

8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/7/2012

Do not consider for truth of the matter asserted.
8/7/2012

Do not consider for truth of the matter asserted.
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012

Do not consider for truth of the matter asserted.
PX

13

iPad Television Advertisements

8/3/2012

Do not consider for truth of the matter asserted.
PX

14

iPhone & iPad Media Clips

8/3/2012

Do not consider for truth of the matter asserted.
PX
PX

15
16

Apple’s Sales of iPhone and iPad
iPhone and iPad Advertising Expenditures

8/3/2012
8/3/2012

1 of 15

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List
EXHIBIT
DESCRIPTION
NO.
Summary of iPhone and iPad News Coverage
PX
17

ADMITTED

Court's Limiting Instruction

8/3/2012

Do not consider for truth of the matter asserted.
PX
PX

21A
23

Screen captures considered by S. Kare
8/7/2012
Summary of Hal Poret's Secondary Meanings Surveys 8/7/2012

PX

24

PX

25A.1

PX

28

PX
PX

30
31

PX
PX

33
34

PX

35

PX

36

PX

38

Summary of Kent Van Liere's Association/Confusion
Surveys: photos and placeholder for videos
Summary of Apple's damages calculations [UNDER
SEAL IN PART]
Summary of Samsung’s fixed, variable, and nonproduct costs [SEALING DENIED BUT UNSEALING
STAYED PENDING APPEAL]
Summary of survey conducted by J. Hauser
Selection of Samsung source code from Bates range
SAMNDCA-C000000001 - SAMNDCA-C000009221
[UNDER SEAL]
iPhone and iPad Advertising Expenditures
Translation of Presentation: Feasibility Review on
Standalone AP Business for Smart Phone Market
Email from J. Boltello re: Additional wallpapers for
Genie
Presentation: Touch Portfolio Rollout Strategy
Recommendation Based on Consumer Insight
Presentation: Browser Zooming Methods UX
Exploration Study

8/10/2012
8/13/2012
8/13/2012

8/10/2012
8/10/2012

8/3/2012
8/13/2012
8/16/2012
8/7/2012
8/10/2012

2 of 15

Do not consider as evidence that Apple trade dress was
famous. You may consider for some other purpose; for
example, whether or not Apple's designs acquired
secondary meaning.

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List
EXHIBIT
DESCRIPTION
NO.
Translation of Email from Bong-Hee Kim regarding
PX
40
Summary of Executive-Level Meeting Supervised by
Head of Division (February 10)
Translation of Email from Hyun Kim regarding PI/P3
PX
42
Division Head Design Report Meeting Minutes, dated
February 16, 2010
Translation of Email from Ki Hyun Seo regarding Team
PX
43
Leader's Directives at the Executives' Meeting 2/22
(Mon)
Relative Evaluation Report on S1, iPhone, March 2,
PX
44
2010 Product Engineering Team SW Verification
Group
Translation of selected pages from Presentation:
PX
46
Behold3 Usability Evaluation Results
S/W Verification Group
Presentation: Samsung's Use of Apple Patents in
PX
52
Smartphones

PX

54

PX
PX
PX

55
56
57

PX

58

PX

59

PX

60

ADMITTED

Court's Limiting Instruction

8/6/2012

8/15/2012

8/15/2012

8/7/2012

8/10/2012

8/10/2012

Presentation: Lessons from Apple
Boston Consulting Group

8/3/2012

Presentation: Samsung mobile icon design for 2011
Presentation: Samsung Q4 '10 Deep Dive
Translation of selected pages from Presentation: P5
Usability Evaluation Results
S/W Verification Group 1
Email from Justin Denison regarding GS Choi's
Direction and Request to STA
Translation of Presentation: North America P4(P7510
WiFi) BBY Retail Store Visit T/F Report
Presentation: STA Competitive Situation Paradigm
Shift [SEALING DENIED BUT UNSEALING STAYED
PENDING APPEAL]

8/14/2012
8/7/2012
8/10/2012

Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.

8/3/2012
8/6/2012
8/3/2012

3 of 15

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List
EXHIBIT
DESCRIPTION
NO.
Presentation: iPhone 5 Counter Strategy
PX
62

ADMITTED

Court's Limiting Instruction

8/3/2012

Do not consider as evidence that Samsung's conduct was
willful; however, you may consider it for some other
purpose.
Video of Samsung infringement of ‘381 patent
Video of Samsung infringement of ‘915 patent:
Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 prepared by Singh
Video of Samsung infringement of ‘915 patent:
Samsung Vibrant phone prepared by Singh
2011 Wireless Smartphone Satisfatction Sture
Management Report, March 2011 [Exhibit 1594 to
Benner Deposition]
3GPP TSG-RAN WG1 Meeting #42, R1-050995
London, UK, 29 August – 2 September, 2005,
Approved Report of 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 #41 in
Athens (Athens, Greece, 09 – 13 May, 2005)
TSG-RAN WG2 Meeting #48, R2-052063, London, 29
August - 02 Sep 2005, Approved minutes of the 47
TSG-RAN WG2 meeting (Athens Greece, 09-13 May
2005)
Addendum 1 ETSI/GA 29(97)/SCM/3, Amendments to
the ETSI Interim Intellectual Property Rights Policy

PX
PX

64
66A

8/10/2012
8/10/2012

PX

66B

PX

69

PX

70

PX

72

PX

74

PX

78

PX

80

PX

81

PX
PX

84
89

Patent Cross License Agreement between Intel and
8/17/2012
Samsung with Amendments 1 & 2 [REDACTED]
3GPP Website Screenshots
8/17/2012
Presentation: Samsung Q1 '11 Deep Dive Continuous 8/13/2012
Tracking (5/16/08 - 04/03/11) [Exhibit 1603 to Benner
Desposition]

PX
PX

91
97

U.S. Patent No. 6,928,648 Wong
U.S. Patent No. 6,819,658 - Agarwal

8/10/2012
8/13/2012

8/17/2012

8/17/2012

8/17/2012

Intel Invoices to Apple (12/22/11-12/29/11) [SEALED 8/16/2012
IN PART]
Letter from SW Kim to B. Teksler, dated July 25, 2011 8/16/2012

8/16/2012
8/17/2012

4 of 15

You may only consider as evidence of knowledge,
willfulness, or intent. Do not consider for any other
purpose.

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List
EXHIBIT
DESCRIPTION
NO.
Japanese Patent Application No. 2002-190774 and
PX
100
English translation
3GPP TSG-RAN WG2 Meeting #47 Tdoc R2-051680,
PX
101
Athens, Greece, May 9-13, 2005, Change Request
PX

104

PX
PX
PX

112
113.4,
113.5
116

PX

117

PX
PX
PX
PX

118
119
120
121

PX
PX
PX
PX
PX

ADMITTED

Court's Limiting Instruction

8/17/2012
8/17/2012

Email from Juho Lee to 3GPP, dated June 18, 2004,
8/17/2012
attaching R1-040697, R1-040689, R-1040690, and R1040696
KR 10-2004-0013792 and English translation
8/16/2012
Sony Ericsson Affidavit of Lee Hill with Attachment
8/16/2012
Sony Ericsson Mobile Comm. AB, “Sony K700 User
Guide” (1st Ed.) March 2004
Sony Press Releases, dated March 9, 2004 and March
21, 2004
U.S. Patent No. 6,009,336 - Harris
U.S. Patent No. 6,069,648 - Suso
U.S. Patent No. 6,690,417 - Yoshida
Source Code Files, Camera and Photos Functionality
(See Appendix 1 for Bates Numbers) [UNDER SEAL]

8/16/2012

122
125

Samsung ETSI IPR Statements
Sony Ericsson K700i mobile phone [Physical Device]

8/17/2012
8/16/2012

127
128
133

How To TV ad for original iPhone
iPad Is Iconic TV ad for first-generation iPad
“Apple Waves Its Wand at the iPhone,” by David
Pogue, New York Times, January 11, 2007

8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012

8/16/2012
8/16/2012
8/16/2012
8/16/2012
8/16/2012

Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.

5 of 15

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List
EXHIBIT
DESCRIPTION
NO.
“Testing Out the iPhone,” by Walter S. Mossberg and
PX
134
Katherine Boehert, The Wall Street Journal, June 27,
2007
“Best Inventions of 2007,” by Lev Grossman, Time,
PX
135
November 1, 2007 (including photo of cover)
“Apple Takes Big Gamble on New iPad,” by Yukari
PX
138
Iwatani Kane, The Wall Street Journal, January 25,
2010
“Verdict Is in on Apple iPad: It’s a Winner,” by Edward
PX
140
Baig, USA Today, April 2, 2010
“Laptop Killer? Pretty Close,” by Walter S. Mossberg,
PX
141
The Wall Street Journal, April 1, 2010

ADMITTED

Court's Limiting Instruction

8/3/2012

Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.
8/3/2012

Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.
8/3/2012

Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.
8/3/2012

Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.
8/3/2012

Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX

142
143
143.04
143.06
143.12
143.16
143.22
143.25
143.82
144
145
146
148
150

“Patent Office Highlights Jobs’s Innovations,” New
York Times
Excerpts from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY10-Q4
Excerpt from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY10-Q4
Excerpt from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY10-Q4
Excerpt from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY10-Q4
Excerpt from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY10-Q4
Excerpt from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY10-Q4
Excerpt from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY10-Q4
Excerpt from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY10-Q4
Excerpts from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY11-Q1
Excerpt from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY11-Q2
Excerpt from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY11-Q3
Nokia Lumia 800 [Physical Device]
Casio G’zOne Commando

8/3/2012

Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012

6 of 15

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List
EXHIBIT
DESCRIPTION
NO.
Sony Tablet S [Physical Device]
PX
155
User Interface Alternative Designs - Blackberry Torch
PX
158A
9850
iPhone CAD
PX
162
Sketch of Phone
PX
163
Phone CAD
PX
164
Phone model 1017
PX
165
Phone model 1015
PX
166
Phone model 956
PX
167
Phone model 961
PX
168
Tablet model 1202
PX
170
Tablet model 874
PX
171
“Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 Wi-Fi: A Worthy Rival to
PX
173
the iPad 2,” by Melissa J. Perenson; PCWorld, June 8,
2011
“First Look: Samsung Vibrant Rips Off iPhone 3G
PX
174
Design,” by Priya Ganapati, Wired, July 15, 2010
Samsung’s Financial Spreadsheet [SEALING DENIED
PX
180
BUT UNSEALING STAYED PENDING APPEAL]
PX

186

PX

193

PX
PX
PX
DX
DX

194
195
210
511
518

Translation of email from H. T. Han regarding
"Domestig Galaxy Tab Main Horzontal Deployment
Items." dated 2010-20-27 [typo: 2010-10-27]
Juho Lee's August 12, 2004 e-mail and attachment
Samsung Proposal R1-040859 at TSG RAN WG1 #38
(Aug. 12, 2004)
Email from Sungsik Lee dated March 2, 2010
Email from Sangwook Han dated October 28, 2010
Photos of the Diamondtouch System
Japanese design patent JP D1241638 (“JP638”)
Video of LaunchTile running on an HP iPAQ device
that was shown by Bederson at the CHI Conference
and HP iPAQ device running LaunchTile

ADMITTED

Court's Limiting Instruction

8/14/2012
8/7/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
8/6/2012

Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.
8/6/2012

Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.
8/16/2012

8/16/2012

8/17/2012

8/13/2012
8/16/2012
8/14/2012
8/6/2012
8/13/2012

7 of 15

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List
EXHIBIT
DESCRIPTION
NO.
Samsung F700 [Physical Device]
DX
526

ADMITTED
8/6/2012

XNav sourcecode
Fidler, Roger. "The Tablet Newspaper Vision 1981 2010." [Ex. 266 to Fidler Dep. Tr.]
iPhone User Guide for iOS 4.2 and 4.3 Software
iPhone User Guide for iOS 5.1 Software
Bederson et al.: Pad++ A Zooming Graphical Interface
for Exploring Alternate Interface Physics
Listing of MERL DiamondTouch Mandelbrot source
code files, dated December 8, 2003 through November
30, 2004, found on the MERL-Drive in the folders:
MERLDrive/diamondtouch/people/forlines/Mandelbrot/src/co
m/merl/diamondtouch and MERLrive/diamondtouch/people/forlines/Mandelbrot/src/com/
merl/forlines/fractal and MERL DiamondTouch Table
with Mandelbrot files
Samsung's December 14, 1998 Declaration to ETSI
Nomura Yasuhiro patent Japanese application and
translation
3GPP standard TS 25.322 version 6.4.0 (Release 6)]
U.S. Patent Appl. No. 60/718187 (Flynt Provisional
Application for Enhanced Portable Device Navigation
Tools); U.S. Patent No. 7,933,632 ("Flynt Patent")

8/15/2012

DX

562

March 8, 2006 email from Howarth to Ive

8/14/2012

DX

572.003

April 15, 2011 E-mail String, Subject: Re: IPhone v
Android Preso, with Smartphone Market Study US
January 2011 attached [Eric Jue Deposition, Ex. 14]

8/13/2012

Do not consider as evidence of invalidity or noninfringement. However, you may consider as evidence of
alternative designs and functionality.

8/13/2012
8/14/2012

561

Court's Limiting Instruction

DX
DX

528
529

DX
DX
DX

533
539
546

DX

548

DX
DX

549
550

DX

557

DX

8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/13/2012
8/14/2012

8/17/2012
8/15/2012
8/15/2012

8 of 15

Do not consider as evidence of invalidity or noninfringement. However, you may consider as evidence of
functionality.

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List
EXHIBIT
DESCRIPTION
NO.
DX 572.004 April 15, 2011 E-mail String, Subject: Re: IPhone v
Android Preso, with Smartphone Market Study US
January 2011 attached [Eric Jue Deposition, Ex. 14]
DX 572.077 April 15, 2011 E-mail String, Subject: Re: IPhone v
Android Preso, with Smartphone Market Study US
January 2011 attached [Eric Jue Deposition, Ex. 14]
DX 572.082 April 15, 2011 E-mail String, Subject: Re: IPhone v
Android Preso, with Smartphone Market Study US
January 2011 attached [Eric Jue Deposition, Ex. 14]
April 14, 2010 Apple internal email chain and meeting
DX
578
agenda; subject line: "iPhone 'firsts'"
Samsung-Apple Licensing Discussion, October 5,
DX
586
2010

ADMITTED

Court's Limiting Instruction

8/13/2012

8/13/2012

8/13/2012

8/3/2012
8/10/2012

DX
DX
DX

592
613
621A

ComTech United States Report Q410
ETSI Guide on IPRs, September 1-2, 2004
Reuter Tablet Video

8/3/2012
8/17/2012
8/15/2012

DX

630

8/16/2012

DX

631

DX

635A

DX
DX

635B
636

DX
DX
DX

645
647
648

Teece Expert Report of 3/22/2012 - Exs. 3A, 3B
[UNDER SEAL]
Teece Expert Report of 4/2/2012 - Exs R4A-R4E
[UNDER SEAL]
Intel Source Code for X-GOLD Processors [UNDER
SEAL]
RLC Detail Design Spec [UNDER SEAL]
Infineon X-GOLD 61x Product Specification [UNDER
SEAL]
TAB 2 [SOURCE CODE] [UNDER SEAL]
iPhone App testing including mail and photos
iPad App testing including mail and photos

8/16/2012
8/15/2012
8/15/2012
8/15/2012
8/14/2012
8/16/2012
8/16/2012

9 of 15

Do not consider this evidence to prove or disprove the
validity or invalidity of a claim or the amount of a disputed
claim. However, you may consider this as evidence of
whether or not Samsung lacked notice of Apple's
infringement claims.

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List
EXHIBIT
DESCRIPTION
NO.
Files related to DiamondTouch, DTFlash, and
DX
655
Tablecloth including but not limited to: TableCloth
source code:
F:\diamondtouch\people\alan\dev\Flash\classes-200506-09\tablecloth_27.fla; Screenshot of Diamond
Touch-Flash Demonstration:
F:\diamondtouch\DTFlash\DTFlash-2005-0607\index.htm TableCloth screenshot:
F:\diamondtouch\DTFlash\Dtflash-2005-06-07 (Trac
decl. Ex. 25) and MERL DiamondTouch Table with
Tablecloth files
MERL DiamondTouch Price List and Terms and
DX
661
Conditions of Sale dated 10/25/05 [Exhibit 2 to Adam
Bogue 3/9/12 Deposition]
12/12/2005 MERL DiamondTouch table and
DX
662
developers Kit Purchase Order [Exhibit 11 to Adam
Bogue 3/9/12 Deposition]
Financial Spreadsheet [UNDER SEAL]
DX
676
DX 684.001 Photographic Summary of Samsung Devices
TSG-RAN WG1 #38, Prague, Czechs, 16th - 20th
DX
685
August 2004, Power control at the maximum power
limit for E-DCH
January 20, 2011 Apple Email regarding competitor
DX
687
products
Mandelbrot source code
DX
693
11/6/2003 email from Adam Bogue to Steve Hotelling
DX
695
re: DiamondTouch
Forlines et al., “Experiences with an Observations of
DX
696
Direct-Touch Tabletops” [Bogue, Ex. 3]
1/14/05 Bogue/Forlines email re: DiamondTouch
DX
697
demos [Forlines, Ex. 7]
10/31/05 Bogue/Forlines email re: DiamondTouch
DX
698
demos [Forlines, Ex. 14]
February 25, 2011 Internal Apple Email Regarding
DX
712
Competitive Phone Tracker

ADMITTED
8/15/2012

8/13/2012

8/13/2012

8/16/2012
8/15/2012
8/15/2012

7/31/2012
8/14/2012
8/13/2012
8/13/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/15/2012

10 of 15

Court's Limiting Instruction

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List
EXHIBIT
DESCRIPTION
NO.
January 17, 2005 email from Alan Esenther to Chia
DX
713
Shen and Adam Bogue re: DTFlash on
\\herc\diamondspace
Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 Take-Apart
DX
717
KR30-0418547, N.B. Certified translation has unique
DX
727
bates range following original
JP D1241383, N.B. Certified translation has unique
DX
728
bates range following original
Apple's 035 Prototype Photos from D'889 File History
DX
740

ADMITTED

Court's Limiting Instruction

8/13/2012

8/15/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
7/31/2012

DX

741

Apple's 035 Prototype with an authenticating
stipulation of fact

7/31/2012

DX

751A

8/10/2012

DX

753

DX
DX
DX

754.502
754.545
781

JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX

1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005
1007
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013

Non-infringement Video [Video]: Samsung Vibrant
phone
Consolidated Financial Statements of Samsung
Electronics Co., Ltd. and Subsidiaries as of December
31, 2011
Apple 10-K Forms, 2007-2011
Apple 10-K Forms, 2007-2011
Summaries of Samsung Profits Pursuant to FRE 1006
[SEALING DENIED BUT UNSEALING STAYED
PENDING APPEAL]
iPhone
iPhone 3G
iPhone 3GS
iPhone4
iPad
iPad2
Galaxy S (i9000)
Intercept [Physical Device]
Galaxy S Vibrant [Physical Device]
Galaxy S Captivate [Physical Device]
Galaxy S Epic 4G [Physical Device]
Galaxy S Fascinate [Physical Device]

8/16/2012

8/16/2012
8/16/2012
8/16/2012

7/31/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
8/3/2012
8/10/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012

11 of 15

Do not consider for non-infringement or invalidity. You
may consider as impeachment evidence.
Do not consider for non-infringement or invalidity. You
may consider as impeachment evidence.

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List

JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX

EXHIBIT
NO.
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037
1038
1039
1040

JX
JX

1041
1042

JX

1043

JX

1044

DESCRIPTION

ADMITTED

Transform [Physical Device]
Galaxy S Mesmerize [Physical Device]
Galaxy S Continuum
Galaxy S Showcase 500 [Physical Device]
Nexus S [Physical Device]
Galaxy S 4G
Gem [Physical Device]
Galaxy Prevail [Physical Device]
Nexus S 4G [Physical Device]
Replenish [Physical Device]
Droid Charge
Indulge [Physical Device]
Infuse 4G [Physical Device]
Exhibit 4G [Physical Device]
Galaxy Ace [Physical Device]
Galaxy S II (AT&T) [Physical Device]
Galaxy S II (i9100) [Physical Device]
Galaxy S II (T-Mobile) [Physical Device]
Galaxy S II (Epic 4G Touch) [Physical Device]
Galaxy S II (Skyrocket) [Physical Device]
Galaxy Tab 7.0 [Physical Device]
Galaxy Tab 10.1 (WiFi) [Physical Device]
Galaxy Tab 10.1 (4G LTE) [Physical Device]
US Trademark Reg for iPhone
Certified copy of US D504,889, issued May 10,2005

8/10/2012
8/6/2012
8/3/2012
8/6/2012
8/16/2012
8/3/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/10/2012
8/10/2012
8/3/2012
8/6/2012
8/3/2012
8/10/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/10/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/7/2012
7/31/2012

Certified copy of US D593,087, issued May 26,2009
Certified copy of US D604,305, issued November 17,
2009
Certified copy of US D604,305, issued November
17,2009
Certified copy of US 7,844,915, issued November 30,
2010

7/31/2012
8/7/2012
7/31/2012
8/10/2012

12 of 15

Court's Limiting Instruction

Do not consider this as evidence that the D'677 patent is
invalid.

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List
EXHIBIT
DESCRIPTION
NO.
Certified copy of US 7,469,381, issued December 23,
JX
1045
2008
Certified copy of US 7,864,163, issued January 4,
JX
1046
2011
Certified file history of US 7,469,381, issued December
JX
1047
23, 2008
Certified file history of US 7,844,915, issued November
JX
1048
30, 2010
Certified file history of US 7,864,163, issued January 4,
JX
1049
2011
Apple iPad 2 3G (iOS 4.x) - AT&T version
JX
1050
Apple iPad 2 3G (iOS 5.x) - AT&T version
JX
1051
Apple iPhone 3G (iOS 4.x)
JX
1053
Apple iPhone 3GS (iOS 4.x)
JX
1054
Apple iPhone 4 (iOS 4.x) - AT&T version
JX
1055
Apple iPhone 4 (iOS 5.x) - AT&T version
JX
1056
Apple iPod Touch (4th Gen.) (iOS 4.x)
JX
1057
File wrapper for 7,675,941 (including file histories of
JX
1060
U.S. Patent App. No. 11/417,219, Korean Patent App.
10-2004-0042300, Korean Patent App. 10-20040062190, Korean Patent App. 10-2004-0073552,
Korean Patent App. 10-2004-0093947, Korean Patent
App. 10-2005-0029192), Korean Patent App. 10-20050037774).
File wrapper for U.S. Patent No. 7,577,460 (including
JX
1066
U.S. App. Nos. 11/493,754, 11/003,222, and
09/540,830 and KR App. No. 1999-11179)
U.S. Patent No. 7,456,893
JX
1068
U.S. Patent No. 7,577,460
JX
1069
U.S. Patent No. 7,675,941
JX
1070
U.S. Patent No. 7,698,711
JX
1071
U.S. Patent No. 7,447,516
JX
1073
HP Compaq TC 1000
JX
1074
Apple iPhone 3GS (iOS 5.x)
JX
1076

ADMITTED
8/10/2012
8/3/2012
8/17/2012
8/17/2012
8/17/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/17/2012

8/17/2012

8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/15/2012
8/14/2012
8/15/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012

13 of 15

Court's Limiting Instruction

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List

JX
JX
JX
JX
JX

EXHIBIT
NO.
1077
1078
1081
1083
1084

JX

1085

JX
JX

1091
1093

JX

1500

PX

2011

PX

2031

PX

2227

PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX

2257
2261
2277
2278
2281
2288

DX

2517

DX

2519

DX

2522

DESCRIPTION

ADMITTED

Apple iPod Touch (4th Gen.) (iOS 5.x)
Fiddler 1994 Tablet Replica
U.S. Patent No. 7,327,349
3GPP TS 25.214 v.6.6.0 (2005-2006)
3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #41 Athens, Greece, 913 May 2005, Change Request
th
3GPP TSG-RAN2 Meeting #47, Athens, Greece, 09 th
13 May 2005, Tdoc R2-051311
MacWorld 2007 Video
LG Prada Phone

8/14/2012
8/17/2012
8/15/2012
8/15/2012
8/17/2012

STA’s & SEA’s US sales of accused products &
Apple’s sales & revenues of the accused products
Exhibit M of Samsung's Disclosure Of Asserted Claims
And Infringement Contentions
Exhibit J of Samsung's Disclosure Of Asserted Claims
And Infringement Contentions
2005-08-25 Email from Bederson to John SanGiovanni
re LAunchTiule source
Production Information
Samsung Icon Design for 2011
Pantech Hotshot
Blackberry Storm
iPhone Human Interface Guidelines
June 13, 2005 Swift File (Tablecloth/ Snapping Back)

8/13/2012

Email 11-18-08 Haining Zhang to Isable-staff re:
Competitive Analysis
Presentation: Mini-Teardown Samsung Galaxy S (TMobile Vibrant) iPod/iPhone New Tech 8.10.10
Email 1-24-11 Eddy Cue to Tim Cook re: Why I Just
Dumped the iPad (Hing: Size Matters)

8/3/2012

Court's Limiting Instruction

8/17/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012

8/15/2012
8/14/2012
8/13/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/17/2012
8/17/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012

8/3/2012
8/3/2012

14 of 15

Do not consider this exhibit as prior art to the D'305
patent.

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List
EXHIBIT
DESCRIPTION
NO.
Email 10-5-05 Steve Jobs to Jony Ive, et al, re:
DX
2524
=?WINDOWS-1252?Q?Fwd:_Samsung=92s_SGH10_Bang_&_Olufsen_=93fas?= =?WINDOWS252?Q?hionphone=94?=
Email 11-7-06 Tony Fadell to Steve Jobs, et al, re:
DX
2525
Samsung Unveils New Communications Device (AP)
DX

DX

2526

2528

ADMITTED

Court's Limiting Instruction

8/3/2012

8/3/2012

Nook Color tablet [used by Van Liere as control for
survey]

8/10/2012

LG G2x [Physical Device]

8/10/2012

Do not consider for any purpose except to evaluate Dr.
Van Liere's survey.
Do not consider for any purpose except to evaluate how
Mr. Poret chose his control devices.

DX

2529

Motorola Zoom tablet [Physical Device]

8/10/2012

Do not consider for any purpose except to evaluate Mr.
Poret's study.
DX

2534

Motorola Atrix F159 [Physical Device]

8/10/2012

Do not consider for any purpose except to evaluate how
Mr. Poret chose his control devices.
DX
DX

2557
2627

Video demonstrating two finger scrolling
3GSM Congress Trade Show Report

8/10/2012
8/15/2012

Do not consider as evidence of invalidity or noninfringement. However, you may consider as evidence of
alternative designs and functionality. The date on the
document is incorrect. The correct date is 2007.

15 of 15