Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
186
Declaration of MELISSA CHAN IN SUPPORT OF #175 SAMSUNG'S STIPULATED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL - CORRECTION OF DOCKET filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 8/25/2011) Modified on 8/31/2011 linking entry to document #175 (dhm, COURT STAFF).
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151)
charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San FranSamsung, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 875-6600
Facsimile: (415) 875-6700
Kevin P.B. Johnson (Bar No. 177129)
kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com
Victoria F. Maroulis (Bar No. 202603)
victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139
Telephone: (650) 801-5000
Facsimile: (650) 801-5100
Michael T. Zeller (Bar No. 196417)
michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com
865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: (213) 443-3000
Facsimile: (213) 443-3100
Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,
LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
INC. and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK
DECLARATION OF MELISSA N. CHAN
IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S
STIPULATED ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULES 711 AND 79-5
Plaintiff,
vs.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
Defendant.
Date: October 13, 2011
Time: 1:30 pm
Place: Courtroom 8, 4th Floor
Judge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
DECL. OF MELISSA N. CHAN ISO SAMSUNG’S ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
1
I, Melissa N. Chan, declare:
2
1.
I am an associate in the law firm of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP,
3 counsel for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung
4 Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”). I have personal knowledge of the
5 facts set forth in this declaration and, if called upon as a witness, I could and would testify to such
6 facts under oath.
7
2.
Exhibits M, N, LL, MM, OO, and QQ of the Declaration of Sara Jenkins in support
8 of Samsung’s Opposition to Apple Inc.’s (“Apple”) Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (“Jenkins
9 Declaration”) contain transcript excerpts and exhibits from the deposition of Mr. Richard Lutton
10 (“the Lutton Tr.”). Apple initially designated the entire deposition as HIGHLY
11 CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY under the interim protective order, but revised its
12 designations on August 16, 2011. However, the deposition excerpts and exhibits attached as
13 Exhibits M, N, LL, MM, and OO to the Jenkins Declaration remain designated by Apple as either
14 CONFIDENTIAL or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY under the
15 interim protective order. Pursuant to General Order No. 62, copies of Exhibits M, N, LL, MM,
16 and OO of the Jenkins Declaration have been lodged with the Court for in camera review, served
17 on all parties, and will be e-filed with the Court pending the Court’s granting of this Motion to
18 Seal.
19
3.
Exhibit O of the Jenkins Declaration contains transcript excerpts from the
20 deposition of Mr. Cooper Woodring (“the Woodring Tr.”). Apple initially designated the entire
21 deposition as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY under the interim
22 protective order, but revised its designations on August 12, 2011. However, a portion of the
23 deposition excerpts attached as Exhibit O of the Jenkins Declaration remain designated by Apple
24 as either CONFIDENTIAL or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY under
25 the interim protective order. Pursuant to General Order No. 62, a copy of Exhibit O of the Jenkins
26 Declaration has been lodged with the Court for in camera review, served on all parties, and will be
27 e-filed with the Court pending the Court’s granting of this Motion to Seal.
28
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-2DECL. OF MELISSA N. CHAN ISO SAMSUNG’S ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
1
4.
Exhibit P of the Jenkins Declaration contains transcript excerpts from the
2 deposition of Mr. Christopher Stringer (“the Stringer Tr.”). Apple has designated this deposition
3 as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY under the interim protective order.
4 Pursuant to General Order No. 62, a copy of Exhibit P of the Jenkins Declaration has been lodged
5 with the Court for in camera review, served on all parties, and will be e-filed with the Court
6 pending the Court’s granting of this Motion to Seal.
7
5.
Exhibit FF of the Jenkins Declaration is a copy of Apple Inc.’s Objections and
8 Responses to Samsung’s Interrogatories to Apple Relating to Apple Inc.’s Motion for Preliminary
9 Injunction and Apple Inc.’s August 18, 2011 verification of its interrogatory responses. Apple has
10 indicated that this document “Contains Highly Confidential – Outside Attorney’s Eyes Only
11 Information” pursuant to the interim protective order. Pursuant to General Order No. 62, a copy
12 of Exhibit FF of the Jenkins Declaration has been lodged with the Court for in camera review,
13 served on all parties, and will be e-filed with the Court pending the Court’s granting of this
14 Motion to Seal.
15
6.
Exhibit HH of the Jenkins Declaration contains transcript excerpts from the
16 deposition of Mr. Bas Ording (“the Ording Tr.”). Apple has designated this deposition as
17 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY under the interim protective order.
18 Pursuant to General Order No. 62, a copy of Exhibit HH of the Jenkins Declaration has been
19 lodged with the Court for in camera review, served on all parties, and will be e-filed with the
20 Court pending the Court’s granting of this Motion to Seal.
21
7.
Exhibit NN of the Jenkins Declaration contains transcript excerpts from the
22 deposition of Ms. Sissie Twiggs (“the Twiggs Tr.”). Apple initially designated the entire
23 deposition as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY under the interim
24 protective order, but revised its designations on August 17, 2011. However, a portion of the
25 deposition excerpts attached as Exhibit NN of the Jenkins Declaration remain designated by Apple
26 as either CONFIDENTIAL or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY under
27 the interim protective order. Pursuant to General Order No. 62, a copy of Exhibit NN of the
28
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-3DECL. OF MELISSA N. CHAN ISO SAMSUNG’S ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
1 Jenkins Declaration has been lodged with the Court for in camera review, served on all parties,
2 and will be e-filed with the Court pending the Court’s granting of this Motion to Seal.
3
8.
Given that Apple designated all or portions of the excerpts and exhibits of the
4 depositions of Richard Lutton, Cooper Woodring, Christopher Stringer, Bas Ording and Sissie
5 Twiggs and Apple Inc.’s Objections and Responses to Samsung’s Interrogatories to Apple
6 Relating to Apple Inc.’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction as CONFIDENTIAL or HIGHLY
7 CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY, those documents, excerpts and exhibits attached
8 as Exhibits M, N, O, LL, P, FF, HH, MM, NN, OO, and QQ to the Jenkins Declaration are
9 properly filed under seal under Local Rule 79-5(d).
10
9.
On July 21, 2011, the Declaration of Richard J. Lutton in Support of Apple’s
11 Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (“Lutton Decl.”) was e-filed under seal. Dkt. No. 128.
12
10.
The Declaration of Michael Wagner (“Wagner Decl.”), and Exhibits B, D and E to
13 the Wagner Decl., submitted in support of Samsung’s Opposition to Apple’s Motion for
14 Preliminary Injunction, discuss documents that have been produced and designated
15 CONFIDENTIAL or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY by Apple.
16 Pursuant to General Order No. 62, copies of the Declaration of Michael Wagner and its exhibits
17 have been lodged with the Court for in camera review, served on all parties, and will be e-filed
18 with the Court pending the Court’s granting of this Motion to Seal.
19
11.
Paragraph 58 and Exhibit 3 of the Declaration of Jeffrey Johnson (“Johnson
20 Decl.”), submitted in support of Samsung’s Opposition to Apple’s Motion for Preliminary
21 Injunction, include confidential, non-public Samsung information, including highly confidential
22 source code, which constitute Samsung trade secrets and intellectual property. Pursuant to
23 General Order No. 62, a copy of the Declaration of Jeffrey Johnson has been lodged with the
24 Court for in camera review, served on all parties, and will be e-filed with the Court pending the
25 Court’s granting of this Motion to Seal.
26
12.
Since the information discussed in the paragraphs listed above from the Wagner
27 Decl. and the Johnson Decl. has been designated by Apple as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL28 ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY or constitutes highly confidential Samsung trade secrets and source
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-4DECL. OF MELISSA N. CHAN ISO SAMSUNG’S ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
1 code, the paragraphs listed above from those Declarations are properly filed under seal under
2 Local Rule 79-5.
3
13.
The confidential, unredacted version of Samsung’s Opposition to Apple’s Motion
4 for a Preliminary Injunction (“Opposition”) contains information or testimony from each of the
5 excerpts designated CONFIDENTIAL or HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES
6 ONLY from the Lutton Tr., the Twiggs Tr., the Woodring Tr., the Stringer Tr., and the Ording Tr.
7 The Opposition also includes information from the paragraphs referenced above from the Lutton
8 Decl., the Wagner Decl., and the Johnson Decl. Pursuant to General Order No. 62, a copy of the
9 confidential, unredacted version of the Opposition has been lodged with the Court for in camera
10 review, served on all parties, and will be e-filed with the Court pending the Court’s granting of
11 this Motion to Seal.
12
14.
On August 18, 2011, my colleague, Sara Jenkins, counsel for Samsung, e-mailed
13 counsel for Apple, requesting that Apple agree to the filing under seal of the sections of
14 Samsung’s Opposition to Apple’s Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, and the supporting
15 declarations or exhibits, which include confidential information. In response to this email,
16 Apple’s counsel indicated that Apple would not oppose Samsung’s Administrative Motion to file
17 this information under seal.
18
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is
19 true and correct. Executed in Redwood Shores, CA on August 22, 2011.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-5DECL. OF MELISSA N. CHAN ISO SAMSUNG’S ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
1 DATED: August 22, 2011
Respectfully submitted,
2
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
By
/s/ Melissa N. Chan
Charles K. Verhoeven
Kevin P.B. Johnson
Victoria F. Maroulis
Michael T. Zeller
Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,
LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
INC. and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-6DECL. OF MELISSA N. CHAN ISO SAMSUNG’S ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
1
2
GENERAL ORDER ATTESTATION
I, Victoria Maroulis, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file the
3 foregoing document. I hereby attest pursuant to General Order 45.X.B. that concurrence in the
4 electronic filing of this document has been obtained from Melissa N. Chan.
5
6
/s/ Victoria Maroulis
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-7DECL. OF MELISSA N. CHAN ISO SAMSUNG’S ADMIN. MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?