Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 1879

ORDER Re: 1853 Samsung's Motion to Correct Exhibit List; Final Exhibit List. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 8/20/12. (lhklc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/20/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

8

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

APPLE, INC., a California corporation,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
)
a Korean corporation;
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., )
a New York corporation;
)
SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
)
AMERICA, LLC,
)
a Delaware limited liability company,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
)
a Korean corporation;
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., )
a New York corporation;
)
SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
)
AMERICA, LLC,
)
a Delaware limited liability company,
)
)
Counterclaim-Plaintiffs,
)
v.
)
)
APPLE, INC., a California corporation,
)
)
Counterclaim-Defendant.
)
)

Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK
ORDER REGARDING SAMSUNG’S
MOTION TO CORRECT EXHIBIT
LIST; FINAL EXHIBIT LIST

27
28
1
Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK
ORDER REGARDING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO CORRECT EXHIBIT LIST; FINAL EXHIBIT LIST

1

Samsung filed a motion to correct the admitted exhibit list. See ECF No. 1853. At the final

2

jury instruction conference, the Court GRANTED in part and DENIED in part Samsung’s request

3

to strike certain exhibits from the final admitted exhibit list. The Court GRANTED Samsung’s

4

motion with respect to PX66A, PX66B, PX64, DX751A, and DX2557, for the reasons stated on

5

the record. The Court DENIED Samsung’s request with respect to PX24.5, PX24.6, and PX24.7

6

for the reasons stated on the record. Additionally, the Court GRANTED Samsung’s request to

7

include DX556 and DX900 to the final exhibit list for the reasons stated on the record. DX 900

8

will consist of the English and Korean versions of Chul-Kwi Kim’s January 6, 2010 e-mail to Jin-

9

soo Kim, which were admitted into evidence as demonstratives bearing the numbers SDX3973.009

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

and SDX3973.010. Samsung will provide a copy of DX900 to Apple for approval.

11

The Court hereby files the final admitted exhibit list that will be given to the jury at the

12

beginning of their deliberations. Two versions of the final admitted exhibit list are attached as

13

exhibits to this Order.

14

Exhibit A is the jury’s admitted exhibits list.

15

IT IS SO ORDERED.

16

Dated: August 20, 2012

_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK
ORDER REGARDING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO CORRECT EXHIBIT LIST; FINAL EXHIBIT LIST

1

EXHIBIT A

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK
ORDER REGARDING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO CORRECT EXHIBIT LIST; FINAL EXHIBIT LIST

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List
EXHIBIT
DESCRIPTION
NO.
Apple and Samsung Smartphones
PX
3
Apple and Samsung Tablets
PX
4
Summary of Press Reports Regarding Samsung
PX
5
Tablet Designs
Summary of Press Reports Regarding Samsung
PX
6
Phone Designs
Photographs of accused Samsung devices
PX
7
Photographs of Apple products
PX
8
Design alternatives considered by Peter Bressler
PX
10
iPhone and iPad Advertisements
PX
11
iPhone Television Advertisements
PX
12

ADMITTED

Court's Limiting Instruction

8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/7/2012

Do not consider for truth of the matter asserted.
8/7/2012

Do not consider for truth of the matter asserted.
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012

Do not consider for truth of the matter asserted.
PX

13

iPad Television Advertisements

8/3/2012

Do not consider for truth of the matter asserted.
PX

14

iPhone & iPad Media Clips

8/3/2012

Do not consider for truth of the matter asserted.
PX
PX

15
16

Apple’s Sales of iPhone and iPad
iPhone and iPad Advertising Expenditures

8/3/2012
8/3/2012

1 of 14

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List
EXHIBIT
DESCRIPTION
NO.
Summary of iPhone and iPad News Coverage
PX
17

ADMITTED

Court's Limiting Instruction

8/3/2012

Do not consider for truth of the matter asserted.
PX
PX

21A
23

Screen captures considered by S. Kare
8/7/2012
Summary of Hal Poret's Secondary Meanings Surveys 8/7/2012

PX

24

8/10/2012

PX
PX

25A.1
28

PX
PX

30
31

Summary of Kent Van Liere's Association/Confusion
Surveys: photos and placeholder for videos
Summary of Apple's damages calculations
Summary of Samsung’s fixed, variable, and nonproduct costs
Summary of survey conducted by J. Hauser
Selection of Samsung source code from Bates range
SAMNDCA-C000000001 - SAMNDCA-C000009221

PX
PX

33
34

8/3/2012
8/13/2012

PX

35

PX

36

PX

38

PX

40

iPhone and iPad Advertising Expenditures
Translation of Presentation: Feasibility Review on
Standalone AP Business for Smart Phone Market
Email from J. Boltello re: Additional wallpapers for
Genie
Presentation: Touch Portfolio Rollout Strategy
Recommendation Based on Consumer Insight
Presentation: Browser Zooming Methods UX
Exploration Study
Translation of Email from Bong-Hee Kim regarding
Summary of Executive-Level Meeting Supervised by
Head of Division (February 10)

8/13/2012
8/13/2012
8/10/2012
8/10/2012

8/16/2012
8/7/2012
8/10/2012
8/6/2012

2 of 14

Do not consider as evidence that Apple trade dress was
famous. You may consider for some other purpose; for
example, whether or not Apple's designs acquired
secondary meaning.

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List
EXHIBIT
DESCRIPTION
NO.
Translation of Email from Hyun Kim regarding PI/P3
PX
42
Division Head Design Report Meeting Minutes, dated
February 16, 2010
Translation of Email from Ki Hyun Seo regarding Team
PX
43
Leader's Directives at the Executives' Meeting 2/22
(Mon)
Relative Evaluation Report on S1, iPhone, March 2,
PX
44
2010 Product Engineering Team SW Verification
Group
Translation of selected pages from Presentation:
PX
46
Behold3 Usability Evaluation Results
S/W Verification Group
Presentation: Samsung's Use of Apple Patents in
PX
52
Smartphones

ADMITTED

Court's Limiting Instruction

8/15/2012

8/15/2012

8/7/2012

8/10/2012

8/10/2012

PX

54

Presentation: Lessons from Apple
Boston Consulting Group

8/3/2012

PX
PX
PX

55
56
57

8/14/2012
8/7/2012
8/10/2012

PX

58

PX

59

PX

60

PX

62

Presentation: Samsung mobile icon design for 2011
Presentation: Samsung Q4 '10 Deep Dive
Translation of selected pages from Presentation: P5
Usability Evaluation Results
S/W Verification Group 1
Email from Justin Denison regarding GS Choi's
Direction and Request to STA
Translation of Presentation: North America P4(P7510
WiFi) BBY Retail Store Visit T/F Report
Presentation: STA Competitive Situation Paradigm
Shift
Presentation: iPhone 5 Counter Strategy

Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.

8/3/2012
8/6/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012

Do not consider as evidence that Samsung's conduct was
willful; however, you may consider it for some other
purpose.

3 of 14

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List
EXHIBIT
DESCRIPTION
NO.
2011 Wireless Smartphone Satisfatction Sture
PX
69
Management Report, March 2011 [Exhibit 1594 to
Benner Deposition]
3GPP TSG-RAN WG1 Meeting #42, R1-050995
PX
70
London, UK, 29 August – 2 September, 2005,
Approved Report of 3GPP TSG RAN WG1 #41 in
Athens (Athens, Greece, 09 – 13 May, 2005)
TSG-RAN WG2 Meeting #48, R2-052063, London, 29
PX
72
August - 02 Sep 2005, Approved minutes of the 47
TSG-RAN WG2 meeting (Athens Greece, 09-13 May
2005)
Addendum 1 ETSI/GA 29(97)/SCM/3, Amendments to
PX
74
the ETSI Interim Intellectual Property Rights Policy

ADMITTED

Court's Limiting Instruction

8/13/2012

8/17/2012

8/17/2012

8/17/2012

PX
PX

78
80

Intel Invoices to Apple (12/22/11-12/29/11)
8/16/2012
Letter from SW Kim to B. Teksler, dated July 25, 2011 8/16/2012

PX

81

PX
PX

84
89

Patent Cross License Agreement between Intel and
8/17/2012
Samsung with Amendments 1 & 2
3GPP Website Screenshots
8/17/2012
Presentation: Samsung Q1 '11 Deep Dive Continuous 8/13/2012
Tracking (5/16/08 - 04/03/11) [Exhibit 1603 to Benner
Desposition]

PX
PX
PX

91
97
100

PX

101

PX

104

PX

112

U.S. Patent No. 6,928,648 Wong
U.S. Patent No. 6,819,658 - Agarwal
Japanese Patent Application No. 2002-190774 and
English translation
3GPP TSG-RAN WG2 Meeting #47 Tdoc R2-051680,
Athens, Greece, May 9-13, 2005, Change Request

8/16/2012
8/17/2012
8/17/2012
8/17/2012

Email from Juho Lee to 3GPP, dated June 18, 2004,
8/17/2012
attaching R1-040697, R1-040689, R-1040690, and R1040696
KR 10-2004-0013792 and English translation
8/16/2012

4 of 14

You may only consider as evidence of knowledge,
willfulness, or intent. Do not consider for any other
purpose.

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List
EXHIBIT
DESCRIPTION
NO.
PX 113.4, Sony Ericsson Affidavit of Lee Hill with Attachment
113.5
Sony Ericsson Mobile Comm. AB, “Sony K700 User
PX
116
Guide” (1st Ed.) March 2004
Sony Press Releases, dated March 9, 2004 and March
PX
117
21, 2004
U.S. Patent No. 6,009,336 - Harris
PX
118
U.S. Patent No. 6,069,648 - Suso
PX
119
U.S. Patent No. 6,690,417 - Yoshida
PX
120
Source Code Files, Camera and Photos Functionality
PX
121
(See Appendix 1 for Bates Numbers)
Samsung ETSI IPR Statements
PX
122
Sony Ericsson K700i mobile phone [Physical Device]
PX
125
PX
PX
PX

127
128
133

How To TV ad for original iPhone
iPad Is Iconic TV ad for first-generation iPad
“Apple Waves Its Wand at the iPhone,” by David
Pogue, New York Times, January 11, 2007

ADMITTED

Court's Limiting Instruction

8/16/2012
8/16/2012
8/16/2012
8/16/2012
8/16/2012
8/16/2012
8/16/2012
8/17/2012
8/16/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012

Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.
PX

134

PX

135

PX

138

PX

140

“Testing Out the iPhone,” by Walter S. Mossberg and
Katherine Boehert, The Wall Street Journal, June 27,
2007
“Best Inventions of 2007,” by Lev Grossman, Time,
November 1, 2007 (including photo of cover)
“Apple Takes Big Gamble on New iPad,” by Yukari
Iwatani Kane, The Wall Street Journal, January 25,
2010
“Verdict Is in on Apple iPad: It’s a Winner,” by Edward
Baig, USA Today, April 2, 2010

8/3/2012

Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.
8/3/2012

Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.
8/3/2012

Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.
8/3/2012

Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.

5 of 14

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List
EXHIBIT
DESCRIPTION
NO.
“Laptop Killer? Pretty Close,” by Walter S. Mossberg,
PX
141
The Wall Street Journal, April 1, 2010

ADMITTED

Court's Limiting Instruction

8/3/2012

Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.
PX

142

PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX

143
143.04
143.06
143.12
143.16
143.22
143.25
143.82
144
145
146
148
150
155
158A

PX
PX
PX
PX
PX
PX

162
163
164
165
166
167

“Patent Office Highlights Jobs’s Innovations,” New
York Times
Excerpts from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY10-Q4
Excerpt from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY10-Q4
Excerpt from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY10-Q4
Excerpt from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY10-Q4
Excerpt from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY10-Q4
Excerpt from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY10-Q4
Excerpt from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY10-Q4
Excerpt from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY10-Q4
Excerpts from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY11-Q1
Excerpt from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY11-Q2
Excerpt from iPhone Buyer Survey, FY11-Q3
Nokia Lumia 800 [Physical Device]
Casio G’zOne Commando
Sony Tablet S [Physical Device]
User Interface Alternative Designs - Blackberry Torch
9850
iPhone CAD
Sketch of Phone
Phone CAD
Phone model 1017
Phone model 1015
Phone model 956

8/3/2012

Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/7/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012

6 of 14

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List

PX
PX
PX
PX

PX

EXHIBIT
NO.
168
170
171
173

174

PX
PX

180
186

PX

193

PX
PX
PX
DX
DX

194
195
210
511
518

DX

526

DX
DX

528
529

DX
DX
DX

533
539
546

DESCRIPTION

ADMITTED

Phone model 961
Tablet model 1202
Tablet model 874
“Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 Wi-Fi: A Worthy Rival to
the iPad 2,” by Melissa J. Perenson; PCWorld, June 8,
2011
“First Look: Samsung Vibrant Rips Off iPhone 3G
Design,” by Priya Ganapati, Wired, July 15, 2010
Samsung’s Financial Spreadsheet
Translation of email from H. T. Han regarding
"Domestig Galaxy Tab Main Horzontal Deployment
Items." dated 2010-20-27 [typo: 2010-10-27]
Juho Lee's August 12, 2004 e-mail and attachment
Samsung Proposal R1-040859 at TSG RAN WG1 #38
(Aug. 12, 2004)
Email from Sungsik Lee dated March 2, 2010
Email from Sangwook Han dated October 28, 2010
Photos of the Diamondtouch System
Japanese design patent JP D1241638 (“JP638”)
Video of LaunchTile running on an HP iPAQ device
that was shown by Bederson at the CHI Conference
and HP iPAQ device running LaunchTile
Samsung F700 [Physical Device]

7/31/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
8/6/2012

XNav sourcecode
Fidler, Roger. "The Tablet Newspaper Vision 1981 2010." [Ex. 266 to Fidler Dep. Tr.]
iPhone User Guide for iOS 4.2 and 4.3 Software
iPhone User Guide for iOS 5.1 Software
Bederson et al.: Pad++ A Zooming Graphical Interface
for Exploring Alternate Interface Physics

8/13/2012
8/14/2012

Court's Limiting Instruction

Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.
8/6/2012

Do not consider for the truth of the matter asserted.
8/16/2012
8/16/2012

8/17/2012

8/13/2012
8/16/2012
8/14/2012
8/6/2012
8/13/2012

8/6/2012

8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/13/2012

7 of 14

Do not consider as evidence of invalidity or noninfringement. However, you may consider as evidence of
alternative designs and functionality.

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List
EXHIBIT
DESCRIPTION
NO.
Listing of MERL DiamondTouch Mandelbrot source
DX
548
code files, dated December 8, 2003 through November
30, 2004, found on the MERL-Drive in the folders:
MERLDrive/diamondtouch/people/forlines/Mandelbrot/src/co
m/merl/diamondtouch and MERLrive/diamondtouch/people/forlines/Mandelbrot/src/com/
merl/forlines/fractal and MERL DiamondTouch Table
with Mandelbrot files
Samsung's December 14, 1998 Declaration to ETSI
DX
549
Nomura Yasuhiro patent Japanese application and
DX
550
translation
2006 Jeffrey Han demonstration video
DX
556
3GPP standard TS 25.322 version 6.4.0 (Release 6)]
DX
557

ADMITTED

Court's Limiting Instruction

8/14/2012

8/17/2012
8/15/2012
8/20/2012
8/15/2012

DX

561

U.S. Patent Appl. No. 60/718187 (Flynt Provisional
Application for Enhanced Portable Device Navigation
Tools); U.S. Patent No. 7,933,632 ("Flynt Patent")

8/15/2012

DX

562

March 8, 2006 email from Howarth to Ive

8/14/2012

DX

572

8/13/2012

DX

578

DX

586

April 15, 2011 E-mail String, Subject: Re: IPhone v
Android Preso, with Smartphone Market Study US
January 2011 attached [Eric Jue Deposition, Ex. 14]
April 14, 2010 Apple internal email chain and meeting
agenda; subject line: "iPhone 'firsts'"
Samsung-Apple Licensing Discussion, October 5,
2010

DX
DX

592
613

ComTech United States Report Q410
ETSI Guide on IPRs, September 1-2, 2004

8/3/2012
8/17/2012

Do not consider as evidence of invalidity or noninfringement. However, you may consider as evidence of
functionality.

8/3/2012
8/10/2012

8 of 14

Do not consider this evidence to prove or disprove the
validity or invalidity of a claim or the amount of a disputed
claim. However, you may consider this as evidence of
whether or not Samsung lacked notice of Apple's
infringement claims.

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List
EXHIBIT
DESCRIPTION
NO.
Reuter Tablet Video
DX
621A

DX
DX
DX
DX
DX
DX
DX
DX
DX

630
631
635A
635B
636
645
647
648
655

DX

661

DX

662

DX
DX
DX

676
684.001
685

Teece Expert Report of 3/22/2012 - Exs. 3A, 3B
Teece Expert Report of 4/2/2012 - Exs R4A-R4E
Intel Source Code for X-GOLD Processors
RLC Detail Design Spec
Infineon X-GOLD 61x Product Specification
Apple iOS Source Code
iPhone App testing including mail and photos
iPad App testing including mail and photos
Files related to DiamondTouch, DTFlash, and
Tablecloth including but not limited to: TableCloth
source code:
F:\diamondtouch\people\alan\dev\Flash\classes-200506-09\tablecloth_27.fla; Screenshot of Diamond
Touch-Flash Demonstration:
F:\diamondtouch\DTFlash\DTFlash-2005-0607\index.htm TableCloth screenshot:
F:\diamondtouch\DTFlash\Dtflash-2005-06-07 (Trac
decl. Ex. 25) and MERL DiamondTouch Table with
Tablecloth files
MERL DiamondTouch Price List and Terms and
Conditions of Sale dated 10/25/05 [Exhibit 2 to Adam
Bogue 3/9/12 Deposition]
12/12/2005 MERL DiamondTouch table and
developers Kit Purchase Order [Exhibit 11 to Adam
Bogue 3/9/12 Deposition]
Financial Spreadsheet
Photographic Summary of Samsung Devices
TSG-RAN WG1 #38, Prague, Czechs, 16th - 20th
August 2004, Power control at the maximum power
limit for E-DCH

ADMITTED
8/15/2012

8/16/2012
8/16/2012
8/15/2012
8/15/2012
8/15/2012
8/14/2012
8/16/2012
8/16/2012
8/15/2012

8/13/2012

8/13/2012

8/16/2012
8/15/2012
8/15/2012

9 of 14

Court's Limiting Instruction

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List
EXHIBIT
DESCRIPTION
NO.
January 20, 2011 Apple Email regarding competitor
DX
687
products
Mandelbrot source code
DX
693
11/6/2003 email from Adam Bogue to Steve Hotelling
DX
695
re: DiamondTouch
Forlines et al., “Experiences with an Observations of
DX
696
Direct-Touch Tabletops” [Bogue, Ex. 3]
1/14/05 Bogue/Forlines email re: DiamondTouch
DX
697
demos [Forlines, Ex. 7]
10/31/05 Bogue/Forlines email re: DiamondTouch
DX
698
demos [Forlines, Ex. 14]
February 25, 2011 Internal Apple Email Regarding
DX
712
Competitive Phone Tracker
January 17, 2005 email from Alan Esenther to Chia
DX
713
Shen and Adam Bogue re: DTFlash on
\\herc\diamondspace
Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 Take-Apart
DX
717
KR30-0418547, N.B. Certified translation has unique
DX
727
bates range following original
JP D1241383, N.B. Certified translation has unique
DX
728
bates range following original
Apple's 035 Prototype Photos from D'889 File History
DX
740

ADMITTED

Court's Limiting Instruction

7/31/2012
8/14/2012
8/13/2012
8/13/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/15/2012
8/13/2012

8/15/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
7/31/2012

DX

741

Apple's 035 Prototype with an authenticating
stipulation of fact

7/31/2012

DX

753

8/16/2012

DX
DX
DX

754.502
754.545
781

Consolidated Financial Statements of Samsung
Electronics Co., Ltd. and Subsidiaries as of December
31, 2011
Apple 10-K Forms, 2007-2011
Apple 10-K Forms, 2007-2011
Summaries of Samsung Profits Pursuant to FRE 1006

DX
JX
JX

900
1000
1001

January 6, 2010 e-mail to Jinsoo Kim
iPhone [Physical Device]
iPhone 3G [Physical Device]

8/20/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012

8/16/2012
8/16/2012
8/16/2012

10 of 14

Do not consider for non-infringement or invalidity. You
may consider as impeachment evidence.
Do not consider for non-infringement or invalidity. You
may consider as impeachment evidence.

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List

JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX

EXHIBIT
NO.
1002
1003
1004
1005
1007
1009
1010
1011
1012
1013
1014
1015
1016
1017
1018
1019
1020
1022
1023
1024
1025
1026
1027
1028
1030
1031
1032
1033
1034
1035
1036
1037

DESCRIPTION
iPhone 3GS [Physical Device]
iPhone4 [Physical Device]
iPad [Physical Device]
iPad2 [Physical Device]
Galaxy S (i9000) [Physical Device]
Intercept [Physical Device]
Galaxy S Vibrant [Physical Device]
Galaxy S Captivate [Physical Device]
Galaxy S Epic 4G [Physical Device]
Galaxy S Fascinate [Physical Device]
Transform [Physical Device]
Galaxy S Mesmerize [Physical Device]
Galaxy S Continuum [Physical Device]
Galaxy S Showcase i500 [Physical Device]
Nexus S [Physical Device]
Galaxy S 4G [Physical Device]
Gem [Physical Device]
Galaxy Prevail [Physical Device]
Nexus S 4G [Physical Device]
Replenish [Physical Device]
Droid Charge [Physical Device]
Indulge [Physical Device]
Infuse 4G [Physical Device]
Exhibit 4G [Physical Device]
Galaxy Ace [Physical Device]
Galaxy S II (AT&T) [Physical Device]
Galaxy S II (i9100) [Physical Device]
Galaxy S II (T-Mobile) [Physical Device]
Galaxy S II (Epic 4G Touch) [Physical Device]
Galaxy S II (Skyrocket) [Physical Device]
Galaxy Tab 7.0 [Physical Device]
Galaxy Tab 10.1 (WiFi) [Physical Device]

ADMITTED
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
7/31/2012
8/3/2012
8/10/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/10/2012
8/6/2012
8/3/2012
8/6/2012
8/16/2012
8/3/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/10/2012
8/10/2012
8/3/2012
8/6/2012
8/3/2012
8/10/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/6/2012
8/10/2012
8/6/2012

11 of 14

Court's Limiting Instruction

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List
EXHIBIT
DESCRIPTION
NO.
Galaxy Tab 10.1 (4G LTE) [Physical Device]
JX
1038
US Trademark Reg for iPhone
JX
1039
Certified copy of US D504,889, issued May 10,2005
JX
1040
JX
JX

1041
1042

JX

1043

JX

1044

JX

1045

JX

1046

JX

1047

JX

1048

JX

1049

JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX
JX

1050
1051
1053
1054
1055
1056
1057
1060

ADMITTED
8/6/2012
8/7/2012
7/31/2012

Certified copy of US D593,087, issued May 26,2009
Certified copy of US D604,305, issued November 17,
2009
Certified copy of US D618,677, issued June 29, 2010

7/31/2012
8/7/2012

Certified copy of US 7,844,915, issued November 30,
2010
Certified copy of US 7,469,381, issued December 23,
2008
Certified copy of US 7,864,163, issued January 4,
2011
Certified file history of US 7,469,381, issued December
23, 2008
Certified file history of US 7,844,915, issued November
30, 2010
Certified file history of US 7,864,163, issued January 4,
2011
Apple iPad 2 3G (iOS 4.x) - AT&T version
Apple iPad 2 3G (iOS 5.x) - AT&T version
Apple iPhone 3G (iOS 4.x)
Apple iPhone 3GS (iOS 4.x)
Apple iPhone 4 (iOS 4.x) - AT&T version
Apple iPhone 4 (iOS 5.x) - AT&T version
Apple iPod Touch (4th Gen.) (iOS 4.x)
File wrapper for 7,675,941 (including file histories of
U.S. Patent App. No. 11/417,219, Korean Patent App.
10-2004-0042300, Korean Patent App. 10-20040062190, Korean Patent App. 10-2004-0073552,
Korean Patent App. 10-2004-0093947, Korean Patent
App. 10-2005-0029192), Korean Patent App. 10-20050037774).

8/10/2012

7/31/2012

8/10/2012
8/3/2012
8/17/2012
8/17/2012
8/17/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/17/2012

12 of 14

Court's Limiting Instruction

Do not consider this as evidence that the D'677 patent is
invalid.

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List
EXHIBIT
DESCRIPTION
NO.
File wrapper for U.S. Patent No. 7,577,460 (including
JX
1066
U.S. App. Nos. 11/493,754, 11/003,222, and
09/540,830 and KR App. No. 1999-11179)
U.S. Patent No. 7,456,893
JX
1068
U.S. Patent No. 7,577,460
JX
1069
U.S. Patent No. 7,675,941
JX
1070
U.S. Patent No. 7,698,711
JX
1071
U.S. Patent No. 7,447,516
JX
1073
HP Compaq TC 1000
JX
1074
Apple iPhone 3GS (iOS 5.x)
JX
1076
Apple iPod Touch (4th Gen.) (iOS 5.x)
JX
1077
Fiddler 1994 Tablet Replica
JX
1078
U.S. Patent No. 7,327,349
JX
1081
3GPP TS 25.214 v.6.6.0 (2005-2006)
JX
1083
3GPP TSG RAN WG1 Meeting #41 Athens, Greece, 9JX
1084
13 May 2005, Change Request
th
JX
1085
3GPP TSG-RAN2 Meeting #47, Athens, Greece, 09 th
13 May 2005, Tdoc R2-051311
MacWorld 2007 Video
JX
1091
LG Prada Phone
JX
1093
JX

1500

PX

2011

PX

2031

PX

2227

PX
PX
PX
PX
PX

2257
2261
2277
2278
2281

STA’s & SEA’s US sales of accused products &
Apple’s sales & revenues of the accused products
Exhibit M of Samsung's Disclosure Of Asserted Claims
And Infringement Contentions
Exhibit J of Samsung's Disclosure Of Asserted Claims
And Infringement Contentions
2005-08-25 Email from Bederson to John SanGiovanni
re LAunchTiule source
Production Information
Samsung Icon Design for 2011
Pantech Hotshot
Blackberry Storm
iPhone Human Interface Guidelines

ADMITTED

Court's Limiting Instruction

8/17/2012

8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/15/2012
8/14/2012
8/15/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/17/2012
8/15/2012
8/15/2012
8/17/2012
8/17/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/13/2012
8/15/2012
8/14/2012
8/13/2012
8/14/2012
8/14/2012
8/17/2012
8/17/2012
8/14/2012

13 of 14

Do not consider this exhibit as prior art to the D'305
patent.

Apple, Inc. v Samsung et al.,
USDC Northern District of CA, San Jose Division
 Case No. 11‐cv‐01846 (LHK)

Admitted Exhibit List
EXHIBIT
DESCRIPTION
NO.
June 13, 2005 Swift File (Tablecloth/ Snapping Back)
PX
2288
DX

2517

DX

2519

DX

2522

DX

2524

DX

2525

DX

2526

DX

2528

ADMITTED

Court's Limiting Instruction

8/14/2012

Email 11-18-08 Haining Zhang to Isable-staff re:
Competitive Analysis
Presentation: Mini-Teardown Samsung Galaxy S (TMobile Vibrant) iPod/iPhone New Tech 8.10.10
Email 1-24-11 Eddy Cue to Tim Cook re: Why I Just
Dumped the iPad (Hing: Size Matters)
Email 10-5-05 Steve Jobs to Jony Ive, et al, re:
=?WINDOWS-1252?Q?Fwd:_Samsung=92s_SGH10_Bang_&_Olufsen_=93fas?= =?WINDOWS252?Q?hionphone=94?=
Email 11-7-06 Tony Fadell to Steve Jobs, et al, re:
Samsung Unveils New Communications Device (AP)

8/3/2012

Nook Color tablet [used by Van Liere as control for
survey]

8/10/2012

LG G2x [Physical Device]

8/10/2012

8/3/2012
8/3/2012
8/3/2012

8/3/2012

Do not consider for any purpose except to evaluate Dr.
Van Liere's survey.
Do not consider for any purpose except to evaluate how
Mr. Poret chose his control devices.

DX

2529

Motorola Xoom tablet [Physical Device]

8/10/2012

Do not consider for any purpose except to evaluate Mr.
Poret's study.
DX

2534

Motorola Atrix F159 [Physical Device]

8/10/2012

Do not consider for any purpose except to evaluate how
Mr. Poret chose his control devices.
DX

2627

3GSM Congress Trade Show Report

8/15/2012

Do not consider as evidence of invalidity or noninfringement. However, you may consider as evidence of
alternative designs and functionality. The date on the
document is incorrect. The correct date is 2007.

14 of 14