Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
1944
ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 1880 Stipulation Dismissing Claims Without Prejudice (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/28/2012)
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1880 Filed08/20/12 Page1 of 7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)
hmcelhinny@mofo.com
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)
mjacobs@mofo.com
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368)
jtaylor@mofo.com
ALISON M. TUCHER (CA SBN 171363)
atucher@mofo.com
RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)
rhung@mofo.com
JASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530)
jasonbartlett@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: (415) 268-7000
Facsimile: (415) 268-7522
Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC.
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No.
170151)
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 875-6600
Facsimile: (415) 875-6700
Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129)
Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603)
555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5th Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065
Telephone: (650) 801-5000
Facsimile: (650) 801-5100
Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417)
865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: (213) 443-3000
Facsimile: (213) 443-3100
Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC. and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC
11
12
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN JOSE DIVISION
17
18
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,
19
20
21
22
23
24
v.
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK (PSG)
JOINT STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
DISMISSING CLAIMS
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; and
SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company,
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4917640.1 JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS W/O PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3165966
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1880 Filed08/20/12 Page2 of 7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Additional attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC.
WILLIAM F. LEE
william.lee@wilmerhale.com
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
Telephone: (617) 526-6000
Facsimile: (617) 526-5000
MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180)
mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: (650) 858-6000
Facsimile: (650) 858-6100
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS W/O PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3165966
02198.51855/4917640.1
1
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1880 Filed08/20/12 Page3 of 7
1
2
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the Court‟s May 10, 2012
3
Order Regarding Parties‟ Statements Narrowing Claims to be Asserted at Trial (Dkt. No. 912),
4
and the Court‟s directive during the June 29, 2012 Case Management Conference to further
5
streamline and simplify the issues in this case, the parties, through their respective counsel of
6
record, hereby stipulate and agree as set forth below. This statement reflects case narrowing that
7
took place prior to trial.
8
WHEREAS, Apple Inc. (“Apple”) commenced the above-captioned action (the
9
“Litigation”) against Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and
10
Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively “Samsung,” and together with Apple,
11
“the Parties” and individually each a “Party”) on April 15, 2011;
12
13
14
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Court‟s May 2, 2012 Case Management Order, a trial in this
action commenced on July 30, 2012 (Dkt. No. 901);
WHEREAS, both parties have previously represented to each other and to the Court that
15
each is willing to dismiss certain claims and counterclaims in the interests of streamlining and
16
simplifying the issues in this case (Dkt. Nos. 893, 902, 1178, 1277);
17
WHEREAS, both parties previously submitted a Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order
18
Dismissing Claims Without Prejudice, which was entered by the Court on May 29, 2012 (Dkt.
19
No. 981); and
20
WHEREAS, both parties previously submitted a Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order
21
Dismissing Claims Concerning D617,334 Without Prejudice, which was entered by the Court on
22
June 21, 2012 (Dkt. 1116).
23
24
25
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the Parties as
follows:
1.
This Stipulation and Order dismisses without prejudice any claims by Apple
26
against Samsung for infringement of Claim 8 of U.S. Patent No. 7,663,607 (Tenth Claim for
27
Relief).
28
2.
This Stipulation and Order dismisses without prejudice any claims by Apple
against Samsung for infringement or dilution by the original Galaxy Tab 7.0 of Apple‟s
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS W/O PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3165966
02198.51855/4917640.1
1
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1880 Filed08/20/12 Page4 of 7
1
2
unregistered iPad/iPad 2 trade dress (First and Fourth Claims for Relief). This Stipulation and
3
Order does not dismiss Apple‟s claims against the Galaxy Tab 7.0 for infringement of Apple‟s
4
utility patents.
5
3.
This Stipulation and Order dismisses without prejudice any claims by Apple
6
against Samsung‟s Acclaim, Nexus S, and Sidekick devices and any claims against the ThinkFree
7
Office application relating to Apple‟s claims of infringement of the ‟381 Patent.
8
4.
Samsung agrees that its corresponding counterclaims seeking declaratory
9
judgment of non-infringement and invalidity for Apple‟s dismissed claims for infringement of the
10
‟607 Patent should be dismissed without prejudice. Samsung further agrees that its corresponding
11
counterclaims of non-infringement against the Acclaim, Nexus S, and Sidekick devices and the
12
ThinkFree Office application should be dismissed without prejudice. This stipulation of dismissal
13
without prejudice is made subject to Samsung‟s reservation of rights to reassert these or other
14
counterclaims and defenses relating to Apple‟s dismissed claims should any such dismissed claim
15
be revived or reasserted by Apple for any reason.
16
17
5.
This Stipulation and Order dismisses without prejudice any claims by Samsung
against Apple for infringement of:
18
a.
Claim 11 of U.S. Patent No. 7,675,941;
19
b.
Claim 17 of U.S. Patent No. 7,447,516;
20
c.
Claim 10 of U.S. Patent No. 7,698,711;
21
d.
Claim 12 of U.S. Patent No. 7,546,893; and
22
e.
All remaining claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,928,604.
23
6.
Apple agrees that its corresponding counterclaims seeking declaratory judgment of
24
non-infringement and invalidity for Samsung‟s dismissed claims for infringement of claim 11 of
25
the ‟941 Patent, claim 17 of the ‟516 Patent, claim 10 of the ‟711 Patent, claim 12 of the ‟893
26
Patent, and all remaining claims of the ‟604 Patent should be dismissed without prejudice. Apple
27
further agrees that its corresponding counterclaims for Breach of Contract – FRAND and Other
28
Standard-Related Misconduct (Twenty-Fifth Counterclaim), Declaratory Judgment that Apple is
Licensed to Samsung‟s Declared Essential Patents (Twenty-Seventh Counterclaim), violation of
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS W/O PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3165966
02198.51855/4917640.1
2
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1880 Filed08/20/12 Page5 of 7
1
2
Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act (Twenty-Eighth Counterclaim), and Unfair Competition
3
Under Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §17200, et seq. (Twenty-Ninth Counterclaim) as they relate to
4
claim 11 of the ‟941 Patent, claim 17 of the ‟516 Patent,, and all remaining claims of the ‟604
5
Patent should be dismissed without prejudice. This stipulation of dismissal without prejudice is
6
made subject to Apple‟s reservation of rights to reassert these or other counterclaims and defenses
7
relating to Samsung‟s dismissed claims should any such dismissed claim be revived or reasserted
8
by Samsung for any reason.
9
7.
Apple agrees that its counterclaims seeking Breach of Contract – FRAND and
10
Other Standard-Related Misconduct (Twenty-Fifth Counterclaim), Declaratory Judgment that
11
Apple is Licensed to Samsung‟s Declared Essential Patents (Twenty-Seventh Counterclaim),
12
violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act (Twenty-Eighth Counterclaim) and Unfair
13
Competition Under Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §17200, et seq. (Twenty-Ninth Counterclaim) for the
14
Samsung claims dismissed in the May 29 Joint Stipulation and Order should be dismissed without
15
prejudice. This stipulation of dismissal without prejudice is made subject to Apple‟s reservation
16
of rights to reassert these or other counterclaims and defenses relating to Samsung‟s dismissed
17
claims should any such dismissed claim be revived or reasserted by Samsung for any reason.
18
8.
Due to the Court‟s granting summary adjudication of non-infringement with
19
respect to Samsung‟s U.S. Patent No. 7,362,867 (“‟867 patent”) (Dkt. No. 1185), Apple agrees
20
that its counterclaims seeking declaratory judgment of invalidity (Twelfth Counterclaim), Breach
21
of Contract – FRAND and Other Standard-Related Misconduct (Twenty-Fifth Counterclaim),
22
Declaratory Judgment that Apple is Licensed to Samsung‟s Declared Essential Patents (Twenty-
23
Seventh Counterclaim), violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act (Twenty-Eighth
24
Counterclaim), and Unfair Competition Under Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §17200, et seq. (Twenty-
25
Ninth Counterclaim) for the „867 patent should be dismissed without prejudice. This stipulation
26
of dismissal without prejudice is made subject to Apple‟s reservation of rights to reassert these or
27
other counterclaims and defenses relating to Samsung‟s dismissed claims should the ‟867 patent
28
be revived or reasserted by Samsung for any reason.
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS W/O PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3165966
02198.51855/4917640.1
3
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1880 Filed08/20/12 Page6 of 7
1
2
3
9.
This Stipulation and Order is not an adjudication on the merits of any of the claims
or counterclaims that are hereby dismissed without prejudice.
4
5
6
7
Dated: August 20, 2012
8
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
By: /s/ Harold McElhinny
HAROLD J. MCELHINNY
MICHAEL A. JACOBS
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR
ALISON M. TUCHER
RICHARD S.J. HUNG
JASON R. BARTLETT
By: /s/ Victoria Maroulis
CHARLES K. VERHOEVEN
KEVIN P.B. JOHNSON
VICTORIA F. MAROULIS
EDWARD DEFRANCO
MICHAEL T. ZELLER
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
WILLIAM F. LEE
MARK D. SELWYN
16
Attorneys for APPLE INC.
Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
CO. LTD, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC., AND SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS W/O PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3165966
02198.51855/4917640.1
4
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document1880 Filed08/20/12 Page7 of 7
1
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
5
August 28
Dated: ___________________, 2012
By:
The Honorable Lucy H. Koh
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS W/O PREJUDICE
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK (PSG)
sf-3165966
02198.51855/4917640.1
5
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?