Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
214
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re #224 Reply in Support of Motion to Compel, filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 9/12/2011) Modified on 9/13/2011 linking entry to document #224 (dhm, COURT STAFF).
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151)
charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 875-6600
Facsimile: (415) 875-6700
Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129)
kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com
Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603)
victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com
th
555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5 Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065
Telephone: (650) 801-5000
Facsimile: (650) 801-5100
Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417)
michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com
865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: (213) 443-3000
Facsimile: (213) 443-3100
Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC. and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK
Plaintiff,
vs.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
Defendants.
02198.51855/4327732.2
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE________
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
I am employed in the County of San Mateo, State of California. I am over the age of
3 eighteen years and not a party to the within action; my business address is 555 Twin Dolphin
4 Drive, 5th Floor, Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139.
5
On September 12, 2011, I served a true copy of the document described as SAMSUNG’S
6 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO COMPEL on the interested parties in this action
7 as follows:
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
HAROLD J. MCELHINNY
HMcElhinny@mofo.com
STEPHEN E. TAYLOR
staylor@tcolaw.com
MICHAEL A. JACOBS
MJacobs@mofo.com
STEPHEN MCG. BUNDY
sbundy@tcolaw.com
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR
JLeeTaylor@mofo.com
JOSHUA R. BENSON
jbenson@tcolaw.com
RICHARD S.J. HUNG
rhung@mofo.com
TAYLOR & COMPANY LAW
OFFICES, LLP
One Ferry Building, suite 355
San Francisco, CA 94111
JASON R. BARTLETT
JasonBartlett@mofo.com
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
WILLIAM F. LEE
william.lee@wilmerhale.com
DEOK KEUN MATTHEW AHN
dahn@mofo.com
MARK D. SELWYN, ESQ.
mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com
GRANT L. KIM
gkim@mofo.com
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304
ALLISON M. TUCHER
atucher@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105
24 BY ELECTRONIC MAIL TRANSMISSION: By electronic mail transmission from
25 brettarnold@quinnemanuel.com, transmitting a PDF format copy of the document to
26
each such person at the email address listed above.
The document was transmitted by electronic
27
transmission and such transmission was reported as complete and without error.
28
02198.51855/4327732.2
-2-
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE________
1
I declare that I am a member of the bar of this Court.
2
Executed on September 12, 2011, at Redwood Shores, California.
3
4
/s/
Brett J. Arnold
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4346105.1
-3-
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE________
1
2
GENERAL ORDER ATTESTATION
I, Victoria F. Maroulis, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file the
3 foregoing CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.
4
In compliance with General Order 45 (X)(B), I
hereby attest that Brett Arnold has concurred in this filing.
5
/s/ Victoria Maroulis
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4346105.1
-4-
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE________
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?