Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
215
ORDER Granting Motion to File Under Seal AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT, ORDER re #211 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Apple Inc. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on September 12, 2011. (psglc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)
hmcelhinny@mofo.com
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)
mjacobs@mofo.com
RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)
rhung@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: (415) 268-7000
Facsimile: (415) 268-7522
7
8
9
Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC.
WILLIAM F. LEE
william.lee@wilmerhale.com
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
Telephone: (617) 526-6000
Facsimile: (617) 526-5000
MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180)
mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: (650) 858-6000
Facsimile: (650) 858-6100
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN JOSE DIVISION
14
15
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,
16
17
18
19
20
v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., A
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York
corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company.,
Case No.
11-cv-01846-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
APPLE’S STIPULATED
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
AS MODIFIED BY THE COURT
21
Defendants.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3042291
1
Plaintiff Apple Inc. (“Apple”) has moved to file the certain documents related to Apple’s
2
Opposition to Samsung’s Motion to Compel Regarding Request For Production No. 1 and
3
Interrogatory Nos. 1, 3, and 6 under seal. In support of the Administrative Motion, Apple has
4
filed the declaration required under Civil L.R. Rule 79-5 and General Order No. 62 to provide
5
evidence of good cause for this Court to permit filing under seal. The declaration establishes that
6
the information contained in the below documents has been designated as HIGHLY
7
CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY by Apple. Samsung does not oppose this
8
administrative motion.
9
10
11
Accordingly, for good cause shown, the Court ORDERS that the following documents
shall be filed under seal:
1. The confidential, unredacted version of Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s Motion to
12
Compel Regarding Request For Production No. 1 and Interrogatory Nos. 1, 3, and 6
13
(“Opposition”)
14
2. The Declaration of Christopher J. Stringer in Support of Apple Inc.’s Opposition to
15
Samsung’s Motion to Compel Regarding Request for Production No. 1 and Interrogatory Nos. 1,
16
3, and 6 (“Stringer Declaration”).
17
3. The confidential, unredacted version of The Declaration of Jason Bartlett in Support of
18
Apple Inc.’s Opposition to Samsung’s Motion to Compel Regarding Request for Production No.
19
1 and Interrogatory Nos. 1, 3, and 6 (“Bartlett Declaration”).
20
4. Exhibits A, B, C, D, E, H, I and J to the Bartlett Declaration.
21
5. The Declaration of Patrick Zhang in Support of Apple Inc.’s Opposition to Samsung’s
22
Motion to Compel Regarding Request for Production No. 1 and Interrogatory Nos. 1, 3, and 6
23
(“Zhang Declaration”).
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
sf-3042291
1
1
2
3
The Court further ORDERS that a redacted version of Apple’s Opposition to Samsung’s
Motion to Compel and the Bartlett, Stringer, and Zhang Declarations shall be filed on ECF.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated: September 12, 2011
By:
HONORABLE PAUL GREWAL
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
sf-3042291
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?