Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 216

ORDER re #213 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Samsung's Reply in Support of its Motion to Compel filed by Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., ORDER Granting Motion to File Under Seal. Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on September 12, 2011. (psglc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
APPLE INC., a California corporation,

CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK

12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
15 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
16 York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
17 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
18

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
SAMSUNG’S STIPULATED
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
UNDER SEAL

Defendants.

19
20
21
22
23

Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. (“SEC”), Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
(“SEA”) and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (“STA”) (collectively, “Samsung”)
have filed Samsung’s Stipulated Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Its Reply Brief In
Support of Its Motion to Compel (“Motion to Seal”).

24
Samsung has filed the declaration required under Civil L.R. 79-5 and General
25
Order No. 62 to provide evidence of good cause for this Court to permit filing under seal.

The

26
declaration establishes that the information contained in the below document has been designated
27
28
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL________

-1-

1 as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY by Apple.

Apple does not

2 oppose this administrative motion.
3

Accordingly, for good cause shown, the Court ORDERS that the following document shall

4 be filed under seal:
5

1. The confidential, unredacted version of Samsung’s Reply In Support of Its Motion

6

to Compel Apple to Produce Documents And Things In Response to Samsung’s

7

Request for Production No. 1 and Further Responses to Interrogatories Nos. 1, 3,

8

and 6 (the “Reply”).

9
10

The Court further ORDERS that a redacted version of Samsung’s Reply shall be filed on

11 ECF.
12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED.

14
15 DATED: September 12, 2011
16
17
18

The Honorable Paul S. Grewal
United States District Court Magistrate Judge

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL________

-2-