Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
244
ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting #243 Motion to Continue (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/20/2011)
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document243-2
Filed09/19/11 Page1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK
12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
15 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
16 York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
17 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
18
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
SAMSUNG’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO
MOVE THE HEARING DATE ON
SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND
MOTION TO STRIKE
Defendants.
19
20
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung
21
Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) have filed Samsung’s Unopposed
22
Motion to Move the Hearing Date on Its Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Strike.
23
Samsung has also filed the declaration required under Civil L.R. 6-3 and has
24
established that there is good cause to move the hearing date on Samsung’s Motion to Dismiss and
25
Motion to Strike.
Plaintiff Apple Inc. also does not oppose this motion.
26
27
28
02198.51855/4352935.1
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO MOVE HEARING DATE________
-1-
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document243-2
1
Filed09/19/11 Page2 of 2
Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that the hearing date on Samsung’s Motion to
2 Dismiss and Motion to Strike is changed from Thursday , September 22, 2011 at 1:30 p.m. to
3 Thursday, October 20, 2011 at 1:30 p.m.
4
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
September 20, 2011
8 DATED: ___________, 2011
9
10
11
The Honorable Lucy H. Koh
United States District Court Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4352935.1
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO MOVE HEARING DATE________
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?