Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 25

Proposed Order re #12 Plaintiff's Motion to Shorten Time for Briefing and Hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Expedite Discovery by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 4/25/2011) Modified on 5/3/2011 counsel faile to link entry to document #12 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151)
2 [e-mail]
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
3 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
4 Facsimile: [phone]
5 Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129)
[e-mail]
6 Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603)
[e-mail]
th
7 555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5 Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065
8 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
9
Edward J. DeFranco (Cal. Bar No.165596)
10 [e-mail]
51 Madison Avenue, 22nd Floor
11 New York, New York 10010
Telephone: [phone]
12 Facsimile: [phone]
13 Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417)
[e-mail]
14 865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017
15 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
16
Attorneys for Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
17 and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC
18
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION

20
21

APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,

22
23

vs.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
24 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
25 York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
26 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
27

CASE NO. 4:11-cv-01846-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SHORTEN
TIME FOR BRIEFING AND HEARING
ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
EXPEDITE DISCOVERY
Date: April 26, 2011
Time:
Courtroom 4, 5th Floor
Judge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh

Defendants.

28
03498.51845/4108504.1

Case No. 4:11-cv-01846-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR
BRIEFING AND HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXPEDITE DISCOVERY

1

Before the Court is Plaintiff Apple Inc.’s (“Apple”) Motion to Shorten Time for Briefing

2 and Hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion to Expedite Discovery (“Motion to Shorten Time”).
3

Having considered Apple’s Motion to Shorten Time, all declarations cited therein, and all

4 pleadings and other papers in support thereof; and the opposition filed by Samsung Electronics
5 America, Inc. and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC, all declarations cited therein, and
6 all pleadings and other papers in support thereof; the Court concludes that good cause does not
7 exist for Apple’s motion. The Court therefore DENIES Apple’s Motion to Shorten Time.
8

Pursuant to the Reassignment Order in this case (D.N. 19), Apple shall re-notice its Motion

9 to Expedite Discovery following the procedures set forth in the San Jose Judges’ Standing Order.
10 The briefing and hearing schedule for Apple’s Motion to Expedite Discovery shall proceed
11 thereafter according to the normal schedule prescribed by the Civil Local Rules of this Court.
12
13

IT IS SO ORDERED.

14
15 Dated: April __, 2011
16

__________________________________________
The Honorable Lucy H. Koh
United States District Court Judge

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
03498.51845/4108504.1

Case No. 4:11-cv-01846-LHK
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR
BRIEFING AND HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXPEDITE DISCOVERY