Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
260
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC re #258 Opposition/Response to Motion, Documents in Support of Samsung's Opposition to Apple's Motion to Compel (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 9/27/2011)
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151)
charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 875-6600
Facsimile: (415) 875-6700
Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129)
kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com
Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603)
victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com
th
555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5 Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065
Telephone: (650) 801-5000
Facsimile: (650) 801-5100
Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417)
michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com
865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: (213) 443-3000
Facsimile: (213) 443-3100
Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC. and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK
Plaintiff,
vs.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
Defendants.
02198.51855/4370357.1
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE________
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
I am employed in the County of San Mateo, State of California. I am over the age of
3 eighteen years and not a party to the within action; my business address is 555 Twin Dolphin
4 Drive, 5th Floor, Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139.
5
On September 26, 2011, I served or caused to be served true copies of the documents
6 described as
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
1. DECLARATION OF MELISSA CHAN IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S
OPPOSITION TO APPLE’S MOTION TO COMPEL
2. EXHIBITS 1-8, 10-22 TO THE CHAN DECLARATION
3. DECLARATION OF RUSSELL WILKINS IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S
OPPOSITION TO APPLE’S MOTION TO COMPEL
4. DECLARATION OF SARA JENKINS IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S
OPPOSITION TO APPLE’S MOTION TO COMPEL
on the interested parties in this action as follows:
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Counsel for Apple, Inc.
HAROLD J. MCELHINNY
HMcElhinny@mofo.com
ALLISON M. TUCHER
atucher@mofo.com
MICHAEL A. JACOBS
MJacobs@mofo.com
STEPHEN E. TAYLOR
staylor@tcolaw.com
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR
JLeeTaylor@mofo.com
STEPHEN MCG. BUNDY
sbundy@tcolaw.com
RICHARD S.J. HUNG
rhung@mofo.com
JOSHUA R. BENSON
jbenson@tcolaw.com
JASON R. BARTLETT
JasonBartlett@mofo.com
WILLIAM F. LEE
william.lee@wilmerhale.com
DEOK KEUN MATTHEW AHN
dahn@mofo.com
MARK D. SELWYN, ESQ.
mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com
23
24
25
26
GRANT L. KIM
gkim@mofo.com
27
28
02198.51855/4370357.1
-2-
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE________
1 BY ELECTRONIC MAIL TRANSMISSION: PDF format copies of the documents were sent
2 to each such person at the email address listed above. The documents were transmitted by
3
electronic transmission and such transmission was reported as complete and without error.
4
5 I declare that I am a member of the bar of this Court.
6 Executed on September 27, 2011, at Redwood Shores, California.
7
/s/
Melissa Chan
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4370357.1
-3-
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE________
1
GENERAL ORDER ATTESTATION
2
3
I, Victoria F. Maroulis, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file the
4 foregoing CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.
5
In compliance with General Order 45 (X)(B), I
hereby attest that Melissa Chan has concurred in this filing.
6
7 DATE: September 27, 2011
/s/ Victoria Maroulis
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4370357.1
-4-
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE________
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?