Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 269

ORDER re #259 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Documents in Support of Samsung's Opposition to Apple's Motion to Compel (Dkt No. 258). Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on 9/28/2011. (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
APPLE INC., a California corporation,

CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG

12
Plaintiff,
13

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL

vs.
14
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
15 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
16 York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
17 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
18

Defendants.

19
20
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung
21
22

Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) have filed Samsung’s
Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Documents in Support of its Opposition to Apple’s

23
Motion to Compel.
24
Samsung has filed the declaration required under Civil L.R. 79-5 and General
25
Order No. 62 to provide evidence of good cause for this Court to permit filing under seal.

The

26
declaration establishes that information contained in the below documents has been designated as
27
28
02198.51855/4368256.1

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL________

-1-

1 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY by both Apple and Samsung.
2 Apple does not oppose this administrative motion.
3

Accordingly, for good cause shown, the Court ORDERS that the following documents

4 shall be filed under seal:
5

1. The confidential, unredacted version of the Declaration of Melissa Chan in Support
of Samsung’s Opposition to Apple’s Motion to Compel (the “Chan Declaration”);

6
7

2. Exhibits 10, 15-17 to the Chan Declaration;

8

3. The confidential, unredacted version of the Declaration of Sara Jenkins in Support
of Samsung’s Opposition to Apple’s Motion to Compel (the “Jenkins

9

Declaration”);

10

4. The confidential, unredacted version of the Declaration of Russell Wilkins in

11
12

Support of Samsung’s Opposition to Apple’s Motion to Compel (the “Wilkins

13

Declaration”).

14

The Court further ORDERS that a redacted version of the Chan Declaration, the Jenkins

15 Declaration, and the Wilkins Declaration shall be filed on ECF.
16
17

IT IS SO ORDERED.

18
19 DATED: _

_, 2011

20
21
22

Hon. Paul S. Grewal
United States District Court Magistrate Judge

23
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4368256.1

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL________

-2-