Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 272

MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages Motion for Administrative Relief to Exceed Page Limit filed by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Exhibit F, #8 Exhibit G, #9 Proposed Order)(Bartlett, Jason) (Filed on 9/29/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)
[e-mail]
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)
[e-mail]
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR (CA SBN 161368)
[e-mail]
ALISON M. TUCHER (CA SBN 171363)
[e-mail]
RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)
[e-mail]
JASON R. BARTLETT (CA SBN 214530)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

WILLIAM F. LEE
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180)
[e-mail]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

10
Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim-Defendant APPLE INC.

11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14

SAN JOSE DIVISION

15
16

APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,

17
18
19
20
21
22

v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., A
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York
corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company,
Defendants.

23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT
CASE NO. 4:11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3051016

Case No.

5:11-cv-01846-LHK

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
APPLE’S MOTION FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF TO
EXCEED PAGE LIMIT

1

Having considered all of the papers filed in connection with Apple Inc.’s motion for

2

administrative relief to exceed the page limit in connection with its Reply in support of its Motion

3

for a Preliminary Injunction, the papers and records on file in this action, and other matters of

4

which the Court may properly take judicial notice, the Court HEREBY ORDERS:

5

Apple’s request for leave to file a Reply brief in excess of the limit under Local Rule 7-

6

4(b), said brief not to exceed 30 pages (exclusive of the caption page, table of contents, table of

7

abbreviations, and table of authorities), is hereby GRANTED.

8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9
10

Dated:

11
12

HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT
CASE NO. 4:11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3051016

1