Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 332

ORDER re motion for shortened time re #327 . Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on 10/27/2011. (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 8 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 APPLE, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD, a ) Korean corporation; SAMSUNG ) ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York ) corporation; and SAMSUNG ) TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Case No.: C 11-cv-1846 LHK (PSG) ORDER SETTING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE ON SHORTENED TIME FOR PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER (Re: Docket No. 327) Defendants. Plaintiff Apple, Inc. (“Apple”) moves to shorten time for the briefing and hearing schedule for its motion for a protective order. Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., LTD., Samsung 20 Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively 21 22 “Samsung”) have informed the court of their intent to oppose Apple’s motion. 23 The court hereby GRANTS Apple’s motion to shorten time. Samsung may file its 24 opposition no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday, October 28, 2011. The court will not consider any 25 reply briefing. The parties shall appear for hearing at 3:00 p.m. on Tuesday, November 1, 2011. 26 Lead outside counsel and senior in-house counsel for both parties shall be present. 27 28 1 Case No.: CV 11-1846 LHK (PSG) ORDER SETTING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE ON SHORTENED TIME 1 2 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 11/27/2011 _________________________________ PAUL S. GREWAL United States Magistrate Judge 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No.: CV 11-1846 LHK (PSG) ORDER SETTING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE ON SHORTENED TIME

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?