Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
332
ORDER re motion for shortened time re #327 . Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on 10/27/2011. (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
8
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
APPLE, INC.,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD, a
)
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG
)
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York )
corporation; and SAMSUNG
)
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC,
a Delaware limited liability company,
Case No.: C 11-cv-1846 LHK (PSG)
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING AND
HEARING SCHEDULE ON
SHORTENED TIME FOR
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A
PROTECTIVE ORDER
(Re: Docket No. 327)
Defendants.
Plaintiff Apple, Inc. (“Apple”) moves to shorten time for the briefing and hearing schedule
for its motion for a protective order. Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., LTD., Samsung
20
Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively
21
22
“Samsung”) have informed the court of their intent to oppose Apple’s motion.
23
The court hereby GRANTS Apple’s motion to shorten time. Samsung may file its
24
opposition no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday, October 28, 2011. The court will not consider any
25
reply briefing. The parties shall appear for hearing at 3:00 p.m. on Tuesday, November 1, 2011.
26
Lead outside counsel and senior in-house counsel for both parties shall be present.
27
28
1
Case No.: CV 11-1846 LHK (PSG)
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE ON SHORTENED TIME
1
2
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 11/27/2011
_________________________________
PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: CV 11-1846 LHK (PSG)
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE ON SHORTENED TIME
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?