Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 340

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Samsung's Opposition to Apple's Motion for a Protective Order filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Arnold Declaration, #2 Proposed Order)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 10/28/2011)

1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151)
 [e-mail]
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
 Facsimile: [phone]
 Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129)
[e-mail]
 Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603)
[e-mail]
 555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5th Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065
 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417)
 [e-mail]
865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
 Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: [phone]
 Facsimile: [phone]
 Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
 AMERICA, INC. and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC



UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT



NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION

 APPLE INC., a California corporation,

CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK



SAMSUNG’S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO
FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL



Plaintiff,
vs.

 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
 ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation; SAMSUNG
 TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,

Defendants.




02198.51855/4418990.1

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

1

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11 and 79-5, and General Order No. 62, Defendants Samsung

2 Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications
3 America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) hereby bring this administrative motion for an order to
4 seal:
5

1. Samsung’s Opposition to Apple’s Motion for a Protective Order;

6

2. Declaration of Brett Arnold in Support of Samsung’s Opposition to Apple’s Motion

7

for a Protective Order (“Arnold Declaration”) and its exhibits;

8

3. Samsung’s [Proposed] Order Denying Apple’s Motion for a Protective Order;

9

Samsung has established good cause to permit filing these documents under seal through

10 the Declaration of Brett Arnold in Support of Samsung’s Administrative Motion to File
11 Documents Under Seal (the “Sealing Declaration”), filed herewith.

The above documents

12 contain discussions or excerpts of deposition transcripts that Apple has designated as
13 CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY under the interim protective order.
14 trusts that Apple will file the necessary declaration validating this designation.

Samsung

The above

15 documents also discuss or contain references to matters that both parties agree are unrelated to the
16 parties’ substantive disputes in this case.
17

Pursuant to General Order No. 62, Samsung’s entire filing will be lodged with the Court

18 for in camera review and served on all parties.
19

Apple does not oppose this motion.

20 DATED: October 28, 2011
21

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP

22
23
24
25
26
27

By /s/ Victoria F. Maroulis
Charles K. Verhoeven
Kevin P.B. Johnson
Victoria F. Maroulis
Michael T. Zeller
Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.,
LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
INC., and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC

28
02198.51855/4418990.1

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

-1-