Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 389

Declaration of Russell Wilkins in Support of #258 Opposition/Response to Motion, filed bySamsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Related document(s) #258 ) (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 11/9/2011)

Download PDF
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151) 2 charlesverhoeve.l1@qu.innemannel.com 50 California Street, 22nd Floor 3 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 875 6600 4 Facsimile: (415) 875~6700 M 5 Kevin P.B. Johnson (Bar No. 177129) keviniohnson(iVt'luinnemal1uel.com 6 Victoda F. MaroUlis·(Bar No. 202603) victoriamal'Oulis@quinnemanuel.com th 7 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5 Floor Redwood Shores. California 94065-2139 8 Telephone: (650) 801 5000 w 9 Facsimile: (650) 801-5100 Michael T. Zeller (Bar No. 196417) 10 michaelzeller@quinllel11anuel.com 865 S. Figueroa St.~ 10th Floor 11 Los Angeles. California 90017 Telephone: (213) 443-3000 12 Facsimile: (213) 443-3100 Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, 14 INC. and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC 15 13 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA~ SAN JOSE DIVISION 18 19 APPLE INC., a California corporation~ CASE NO. 20 DECLARATION OF RUSSELL WILKINS 21 Plaintiff, ll-cv·01846~L:HK PUBLIC REDACTED VERSION VS. 22 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO.> LTD.~ a Korean business elltity~ SAMSUNG 23 ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., aNew York corporation; SAMSUNG 24 TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERrCA~ LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 25 26 Defendant. 27 28 Case No. 11.cy-01846-l.HK 1 I, Russell Wilkins, do hereby declare as follows: 2 1. 3 I am Senior Manager of Samstmg's Voice of 'the Customer (Voe) Department at Samsung Telecommunications Amerioa, LLC ("STA"). I have been employed by STA since 4 2003. I oversee all of the call centers that service Samswlg's U.S. mobile products. I have 5 personal knowledge of the matters set forth herein, and if called as a witness, I could and would 6 testify competently as follows. 7 2. STA operates call centers which offer product support and receive feedback from 8 customers regardil~g Samsung's products. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 3. I understand that ill this litigation, Apple has asked Samsung to produce "any 17 instances of consumer confusion in which Samsung was made aware that a person confused an 18 Apple product for a Product at Issue, or a Product at Issue for an Apple produce' 19 4. It would be very difficult and time-consl:uning to attempt to search for and locate 20 docUlllents responsive to this request. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 5. 28 .1. Ca.~e No. ll-cv-018t.l6-LHK 1 2 3 4 5 6 6. 7 8 9 10 11 7. 12 13 For example. it is 14 possible that Samsung customers may have contacted the call centers to conU11t;mt on how they 15 disliked their previous Apple product, hut enjoy using their SamSlUlg product. This would not be 16 responsive to Apple)s requests, because the conSl;~lUer is not expressing any confusion as to the 17 source of the product he or she was calling about. 18 II 19 II 20 II 21 II 22 II 23 II 24 II 25 II 26 II 27 II 28 II -2- Case No. l1-cv-01846-LHK 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I declare 1..Il1der the penalty of perjury that the forgoing is tru.e and correct to the best of my knowledge. EXeCl.lted this 26th day of September, 2011 1 at Colorado Springs/ Colorado. ~~--~ Russell Wilkins 1  GENERAL ORDER ATTESTATION I, Victoria Maroulis, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file the  foregoing document. I hereby attest pursuant to General Order 45.X.B. that concurrence in the  electronic filing of this document has been obtained from Russell Wilkins.   /s/ Victoria Maroulis                       02198.51855/4440478.2 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK WILKINS DECL. ISO SAMSUNG’S OPP. TO APPLE’S MOTION TO COMPEL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?