Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 443

STIPULATION and [Proposed] Order Extending Briefing Schedule for Samsung's Motion to Dismiss Apple's Amended Counterclaims by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Selwyn, Mark) (Filed on 12/1/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781) hmcelhinny@mofo.com MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664) mjacobs@mofo.com RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425) rhung@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: (415) 268-7000 Facsimile: (415) 268-7522 WILLIAM F. LEE (pro hac vice) william.lee@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 60 State Street Boston, Massachusetts 02109 Telephone: (617) 526-6000 Facsimile: (617) 526-5000 MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180) mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 950 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 858-6000 Facsimile: (650) 858-6100 7 8 9 10 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant Apple Inc. 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 SAN JOSE DIVISION 16 17 APPLE INC., a California corporation, 18 Plaintiffs, 19 20 21 22 Case No. vs. 4:11-CV-01846-LHK STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO DISMISS APPLE’S AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation, and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 23 24 Date: Time: Place: Judge: Defendants. 25 April 5, 2012 1:30 p.m. Courtroom 8, 4th Floor Hon. Lucy H. Koh 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO DISMISS APPLE’S AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS 1 Case No. 4:11-cv-01846 (LHK) OPPOS FOR 1 2 3 4 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation, and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, a California corporation, 5 Counterclaim-Plaintiff, 6 v. 7 8 APPLE INC., a California corporation, 9 Counterclaim-Defendants. 10 11 WHEREAS, on November 22, 2011, defendants Samsung Electronics Co. LTD, 12 13 Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC 14 (collectively, “Samsung”) have filed a Motion to Dismiss Apple’s Amended Counterclaims 15 (“Motion to Dismiss”); 16 WHEREAS, Apple’s current deadline to respond to Samsung’s Motion to Dismiss is 17 December 6, 2011; 18 WHEREAS, Samsung’s current deadline to file its reply is December 13, 2011; 19 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties 20 21 22 23 that: 1. The time for Apple to respond to Samsung’s Motion to Dismiss shall be extended fourteen (14) days, up to and including December 20; and 24 2. The time for Samsung to file its reply shall be extended up to and including 25 26 January 9, 2012. 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO DISMISS APPLE’S AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS 2 Case No. 4:11-cv-01846 (LHK) OPPOS FOR 1 Dated: December 1, 2011 2 WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN By: By: 3 4 5 /s/ Mark D. Selwyn MARK D. SELWYN 6 7 /s/ Todd Briggs CHARLES K. VERHOEVEN KEVIN P.B. JOHNSON VICTORIA F. MAROULIS EDWARD DEFRANCO MICHAEL T. ZELLER 8 9 Attorney for Plaintiff APPLE INC. Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., AND SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO DISMISS APPLE’S AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS 3 Case No. 4:11-cv-01846 (LHK) OPPOS FOR ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE 1 2 I, Mark D. Selwyn, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 3 Declaration. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Todd Briggs has 4 concurred in this filing. 5 6 7 Dated: December 1, 2011 /s/ Mark. D Selwyn Mark D. Selwyn 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO DISMISS APPLE’S AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS 4 Case No. 4:11-cv-01846 (LHK) OPPOS FOR PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 1 2 3 4 Dated: , 2011 By: 5 Honorable Lucy H. Koh 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO DISMISS APPLE’S AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS 5 Case No. 4:11-cv-01846 (LHK) OPPOS FOR

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?