Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
443
STIPULATION and [Proposed] Order Extending Briefing Schedule for Samsung's Motion to Dismiss Apple's Amended Counterclaims by Apple Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration)(Selwyn, Mark) (Filed on 12/1/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781)
hmcelhinny@mofo.com
MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664)
mjacobs@mofo.com
RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425)
rhung@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: (415) 268-7000
Facsimile: (415) 268-7522
WILLIAM F. LEE (pro hac vice)
william.lee@wilmerhale.com
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
60 State Street
Boston, Massachusetts 02109
Telephone: (617) 526-6000
Facsimile: (617) 526-5000
MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180)
mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: (650) 858-6000
Facsimile: (650) 858-6100
7
8
9
10
11
Attorneys for Plaintiff and
Counterclaim-Defendant Apple Inc.
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
SAN JOSE DIVISION
16
17
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
18
Plaintiffs,
19
20
21
22
Case No.
vs.
4:11-CV-01846-LHK
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR SAMSUNG’S MOTION
TO DISMISS APPLE’S AMENDED
COUNTERCLAIMS
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity, SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation, and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
23
24
Date:
Time:
Place:
Judge:
Defendants.
25
April 5, 2012
1:30 p.m.
Courtroom 8, 4th Floor
Hon. Lucy H. Koh
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO
DISMISS APPLE’S AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS
1
Case No. 4:11-cv-01846 (LHK)
OPPOS
FOR
1
2
3
4
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity, SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation, and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, a
California corporation,
5
Counterclaim-Plaintiff,
6
v.
7
8
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
9
Counterclaim-Defendants.
10
11
WHEREAS, on November 22, 2011, defendants Samsung Electronics Co. LTD,
12
13
Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC
14
(collectively, “Samsung”) have filed a Motion to Dismiss Apple’s Amended Counterclaims
15
(“Motion to Dismiss”);
16
WHEREAS, Apple’s current deadline to respond to Samsung’s Motion to Dismiss is
17
December 6, 2011;
18
WHEREAS, Samsung’s current deadline to file its reply is December 13, 2011;
19
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties
20
21
22
23
that:
1.
The time for Apple to respond to Samsung’s Motion to Dismiss shall be extended
fourteen (14) days, up to and including December 20; and
24
2.
The time for Samsung to file its reply shall be extended up to and including
25
26
January 9, 2012.
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO
DISMISS APPLE’S AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS
2
Case No. 4:11-cv-01846 (LHK)
OPPOS
FOR
1
Dated: December 1, 2011
2
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN
By:
By:
3
4
5
/s/ Mark D. Selwyn
MARK D. SELWYN
6
7
/s/ Todd Briggs
CHARLES K. VERHOEVEN
KEVIN P.B. JOHNSON
VICTORIA F. MAROULIS
EDWARD DEFRANCO
MICHAEL T. ZELLER
8
9
Attorney for Plaintiff
APPLE INC.
Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
CO. LTD, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC., AND SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO
DISMISS APPLE’S AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS
3
Case No. 4:11-cv-01846 (LHK)
OPPOS
FOR
ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE
1
2
I, Mark D. Selwyn, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
3
Declaration. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Todd Briggs has
4
concurred in this filing.
5
6
7
Dated: December 1, 2011
/s/ Mark. D Selwyn
Mark D. Selwyn
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO
DISMISS APPLE’S AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS
4
Case No. 4:11-cv-01846 (LHK)
OPPOS
FOR
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
1
2
3
4
Dated:
, 2011
By:
5
Honorable Lucy H. Koh
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO
DISMISS APPLE’S AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS
5
Case No. 4:11-cv-01846 (LHK)
OPPOS
FOR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?