Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 479

MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages re Samsung's Administrative Motion to Exceed Page Limit in Samsung's Responsive Claim Construction Brief filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Briggs Declaration, #2 Exhibit 1 to Briggs Declaration, #3 Exhibit 2 to Briggs Declaration, #4 Proposed Order)(Briggs, Todd) (Filed on 12/12/2011)

EXHIBIT 1

Todd Briggs
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:

Ahn, Deok Keun Matthew [[e-mail]]
Wednesday, December 07, 2011 3:03 PM
Todd Briggs; Samsung v. Apple; Alan Whitehurst; Victoria Maroulis
Jacobs, Michael A.; Monach, Andrew E.; Hung, Richard S. J.; Selwyn, Mark; Stevens,
Bethany; Herriot, Liv; Kreeger, Matthew I.; Kolovos, Peter
RE: Apple v. Samsung -- Claim construction briefs and page limits

Todd,
We intend to adhere to the briefing limits set forth in the local rules.
Matt

From: Ahn, Deok Keun Matthew
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2011 12:27 PM
To: 'Todd Briggs'; Samsung v. Apple; Alan Whitehurst; Victoria Maroulis
Cc: Jacobs, Michael A.; Monach, Andrew E.; Hung, Richard S. J.; Selwyn, Mark; Stevens, Bethany; Herriot, Liv; Kreeger,
Matthew I.; 'Kolovos, Peter'
Subject: RE: Apple v. Samsung -- Claim construction briefs and page limits
Todd,
As discussed, we are in agreement on the schedule for, and subject matter of, each party's briefs. We'll get back to you
as soon as possible on your page limits proposal.
Matt

From: Todd Briggs [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 9:22 PM
To: Todd Briggs; 'Kolovos, Peter'; Kreeger, Matthew I.
Cc: Ahn, Deok Keun Matthew; Alan Whitehurst; Victoria Maroulis; Jacobs, Michael A.; Monach, Andrew E.; Hung, Richard
S. J.; Selwyn, Mark; Stevens, Bethany; Herriot, Liv; Samsung v. Apple
Subject: RE: Apple v. Samsung -- Claim construction briefs and page limits

Peter and Matthew, 

I have not heard back from you on my email below.  Will you please provide a response tomorrow.   

Thanks, Todd 

From: Todd Briggs
Sent: Sunday, November 27, 2011 10:56 AM
To: Kolovos, Peter; Kreeger, Matthew I.
Cc: [e-mail]; Alan Whitehurst; Victoria Maroulis; [e-mail]; Monach, Andrew E.; [e-mail];
Selwyn, Mark; Stevens, Bethany; Herriot, Liv; Samsung v. Apple
Subject: Apple v. Samsung -- Claim construction briefs and page limits

Peter and Matthew, 

1

I wanted to follow up on our conversation a few weeks ago regarding claim construction briefs and page 
limits.  We understand that the claim construction briefs will address the 10 terms identified by the parties as 
follows.  Please confirm that this is your understanding as well.  

12/8     Samsung’s opening brief – addresses the 2 disputed terms from Samsung’s patents 
12/8     Apple’s opening brief – addresses the 8 disputed terms from Apple’s patents 

12/22   Samsung’s response brief – addresses the 8 disputed terms from Apple’s patents 
12/22   Apple’s response brief – addresses the 2 disputed terms from Samsung’s patents 

12/29   Samsung’s reply brief – addresses the 2 disputed terms from Samsung’s patents 
12/29   Apple’s reply brief – addresses the 8 disputed terms from Apple’s patents 

With respect to page limits, we proposed that the parties be allowed to use their page limitations in flexible 
way.  This will allow both sides to more evenly distribute the total number of pages available under the local 
rules to each disputed term.  I believe that each party is entitled to a total of 65 pages under the local rules (25 
opening/25 response/15 reply).  Please let us know if this proposal is acceptable to you.  If so, we should file a 
stipulation alerting the Court to this agreement.     

Best Regards,  

Todd Briggs
Partner,

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
555 Twin Dolphin Drive, 5th Floor
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
650-801-5020 Direct
650.801.5000 Main Office Number
650.801.5100 FAX
[e-mail]
www.quinnemanuel.com
NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message
may be an attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any
review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by e-mail, and delete the original message.  

--------------------------------------------------------------------To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, Morrison & Foerster LLP informs you that, if any
advice concerning one or more U.S. Federal tax issues is contained in this communication (including any
attachments), such advice is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i)
avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another
party any transaction or matter addressed herein.
For information about this legend, go to
http://www.mofo.com/Circular230/
============================================================================
2

This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or
authorized to receive for the addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any
information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by
reply e-mail @mofo.com, and delete the message.
---------------------------------------------------------------------

3