Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
483
Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Samsung's Motion to Compel filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Hall Declaration, #2 Proposed Order)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 12/12/2011)
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151)
charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 875-6600
Facsimile: (415) 875-6700
Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129)
kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com
Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603)
victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com
555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5th Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065
Telephone: (650) 801-5000
Facsimile: (650) 801-5100
Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417)
michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com
865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: (213) 443-3000
Facsimile: (213) 443-3100
Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC. and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK
DECLARATION OF SCOTT HALL IN
SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO
FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
Plaintiff,
vs.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
Defendants.
02198.51855/4502744.1
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
HALL DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S
MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
1
I, Scott Hall, declare:
2
1.
I am an attorney in the law firm of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP,
3 counsel for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung
4
5
Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, ―Samsung‖).
Unless otherwise indicated, I
have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this declaration and, if called upon as a witness, I
6
7
8
could and would testify as follows.
2.
The requested relief is necessary to protect the confidentiality of information
9 discussed in Samsung’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Things and Responsive
10 Answers to Propounded Discovery; the Declaration of Diane C. Hutnyan in Support of Samsung’s
11 Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Things and Responsive Answers to Propounded
12
Discovery ("Hutnyan Declaration"); and the exhibits attached thereto.
These documents contain
13
information and references from documents that the parties have designated as Highly
14
15
Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only. These documents reveal the content of Samsung's and
16 Apple's sensitive, internal, business documents, the disclosure of which could cause serious
17 business harm to Samsung.
18
3.
Exhibit 1 of the Hutnyan Declaration consists of excerpts from the deposition
19 transcript of Mr. Bas Ording, an Apple witness, that Apple has designated as HIGHLY
20
CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY.
21
4.
Exhibit 2 consists of excerpts from the deposition transcript of Mr. Steven
22
23
24
Christensen, an Apple witness, that Apple has designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL.
5.
Exhibit 3 is several photographs that Samsung took of Apple's 035 mockup during
25 inspections on October 20 and November 1, 2011.
Apple has designated these photographs as
26 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY.
27
28
02198.51855/4502744.1
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-2HALL DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S
MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
1
6.
Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of a letter dated November 22, 2011, discussing
2 documents and information that Apple has designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL–
3
4
ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY.
7.
Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of a letter dated November 28, 2011, discussing
5
6
7
8
documents and information that Apple has designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL–
ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY.
8.
Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of a letter dated November 29, 2011, discussing
9 documents and information that Apple has designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL–
10 ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY.
11
9.
Exhibit 7 is a true and correct copy of a letter dated November 8, 2011, discussing
12
the deposition testimony of Mr. Douglas Satzger, an Apple witness, which Apple has designated
13
14
15
as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL– ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY.
10.
Exhibit 8 consists of true and correct copies of documents produced by Apple in
16 this action, Bates labeled APLNDC-NCC00000267-273, which Apple has designated as HIGHLY
17 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY.
18
19
20
11.
Exhibit 9 consists of true and correct copies of documents produced by Apple in
this action, Bates labeled APLNDC0000036646, 36657, 36892, 37167 and 37177, which Apple
has designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY.
21
22
12.
Exhibit 10 consists of excerpts from the deposition transcript of Mr. Eugene
23 Whang, an Apple witness, that Apple has designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL.
24
13.
Exhibit 11 is a true and correct copy of a letter dated November 8, 2011, discussing
25 documents and information which Apple has designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL–
26
ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY.
27
28
02198.51855/4502744.1
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-3HALL DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S
MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
1
14.
Exhibit 12 is a true and correct copy of a document produced by Apple in this
2 action, Bates labeled APLNDC0001205801, which Apple has designated as HIGHLY
3
4
CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY.
15.
Exhibit 13 is a true and correct copy of a letter dated November 8, 2011, discussing
5
6
7
8
documents and information which Apple has designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL–
ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY.
16.
Exhibit 15 consists of excerpts from the deposition transcript of Mr. Peter Russell-
9 Clarke, an Apple witness, that Apple has designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL–
10 ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY
11
17.
Exhibit 16 consists of excerpts from the deposition transcript of Mr. Richard
12
Howarth, an Apple witness, that Apple has designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL–
13
14
15
ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY.
18.
Exhibit 17 consists of excerpts from the deposition transcript of Mr. Matthew
16 Rohrbach, an Apple witness, that Apple has designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL–
17 ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY.
18
19
19.
Exhibit 18 consists of excerpts from the deposition transcript of Mr. Christopher
Stringer, an Apple witness, that Apple has designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL– OUTSIDE
20
COUNSEL ONLY.
21
22
20.
Exhibit 19 consists of excerpts from the deposition transcript of Mr. Douglas
23 Satzger, an Apple witness, that Apple has designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL–
24 ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY.
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4502744.1
21.
Exhibit 21 is a true and correct copy of a letter dated October 21, 2011, discussing
documents and information which Apple has designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL–
ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY.
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-4HALL DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S
MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
1
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed in
2 Redwood Shores, California on December 12, 2011.
3
4
/s/ Scott Hall
Scott Hall
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4502744.1
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-5HALL DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S
MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
1
2
GENERAL ORDER ATTESTATION
I, Victoria Maroulis, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file the
3 foregoing document.
I hereby attest pursuant to General Order 45.X.B. that concurrence in the
4 electronic filing of this document has been obtained from Scott Hall.
5
6
/s/ Victoria Maroulis
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4502744.1
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-6HALL DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S
MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?