Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 483

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Samsung's Motion to Compel filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Hall Declaration, #2 Proposed Order)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 12/12/2011)

Download PDF
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151)  charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com 50 California Street, 22nd Floor  San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-6600  Facsimile: (415) 875-6700  Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129) kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com  Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603) victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com  555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5th Floor Redwood Shores, California 94065  Telephone: (650) 801-5000 Facsimile: (650) 801-5100  Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417)  michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com 865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor  Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: (213) 443-3000  Facsimile: (213) 443-3100  Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS  AMERICA, INC. and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC   UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION  APPLE INC., a California corporation, CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK  DECLARATION OF SCOTT HALL IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL  Plaintiff, vs.  SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity; SAMSUNG  ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG  TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,  Defendants.      02198.51855/4502744.1 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK HALL DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL 1 I, Scott Hall, declare: 2 1. I am an attorney in the law firm of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, 3 counsel for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung 4 5 Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, ―Samsung‖). Unless otherwise indicated, I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this declaration and, if called upon as a witness, I 6 7 8 could and would testify as follows. 2. The requested relief is necessary to protect the confidentiality of information 9 discussed in Samsung’s Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Things and Responsive 10 Answers to Propounded Discovery; the Declaration of Diane C. Hutnyan in Support of Samsung’s 11 Motion to Compel Production of Documents and Things and Responsive Answers to Propounded 12 Discovery ("Hutnyan Declaration"); and the exhibits attached thereto. These documents contain 13 information and references from documents that the parties have designated as Highly 14 15 Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only. These documents reveal the content of Samsung's and 16 Apple's sensitive, internal, business documents, the disclosure of which could cause serious 17 business harm to Samsung. 18 3. Exhibit 1 of the Hutnyan Declaration consists of excerpts from the deposition 19 transcript of Mr. Bas Ording, an Apple witness, that Apple has designated as HIGHLY 20 CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS EYES ONLY. 21 4. Exhibit 2 consists of excerpts from the deposition transcript of Mr. Steven 22 23 24 Christensen, an Apple witness, that Apple has designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL. 5. Exhibit 3 is several photographs that Samsung took of Apple's 035 mockup during 25 inspections on October 20 and November 1, 2011. Apple has designated these photographs as 26 HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY. 27 28 02198.51855/4502744.1 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK -2HALL DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL 1 6. Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of a letter dated November 22, 2011, discussing 2 documents and information that Apple has designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL– 3 4 ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY. 7. Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of a letter dated November 28, 2011, discussing 5 6 7 8 documents and information that Apple has designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL– ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY. 8. Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of a letter dated November 29, 2011, discussing 9 documents and information that Apple has designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL– 10 ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY. 11 9. Exhibit 7 is a true and correct copy of a letter dated November 8, 2011, discussing 12 the deposition testimony of Mr. Douglas Satzger, an Apple witness, which Apple has designated 13 14 15 as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL– ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY. 10. Exhibit 8 consists of true and correct copies of documents produced by Apple in 16 this action, Bates labeled APLNDC-NCC00000267-273, which Apple has designated as HIGHLY 17 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY. 18 19 20 11. Exhibit 9 consists of true and correct copies of documents produced by Apple in this action, Bates labeled APLNDC0000036646, 36657, 36892, 37167 and 37177, which Apple has designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY. 21 22 12. Exhibit 10 consists of excerpts from the deposition transcript of Mr. Eugene 23 Whang, an Apple witness, that Apple has designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL. 24 13. Exhibit 11 is a true and correct copy of a letter dated November 8, 2011, discussing 25 documents and information which Apple has designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL– 26 ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY. 27 28 02198.51855/4502744.1 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK -3HALL DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL 1 14. Exhibit 12 is a true and correct copy of a document produced by Apple in this 2 action, Bates labeled APLNDC0001205801, which Apple has designated as HIGHLY 3 4 CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY. 15. Exhibit 13 is a true and correct copy of a letter dated November 8, 2011, discussing 5 6 7 8 documents and information which Apple has designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL– ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY. 16. Exhibit 15 consists of excerpts from the deposition transcript of Mr. Peter Russell- 9 Clarke, an Apple witness, that Apple has designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL– 10 ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY 11 17. Exhibit 16 consists of excerpts from the deposition transcript of Mr. Richard 12 Howarth, an Apple witness, that Apple has designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL– 13 14 15 ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY. 18. Exhibit 17 consists of excerpts from the deposition transcript of Mr. Matthew 16 Rohrbach, an Apple witness, that Apple has designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL– 17 ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY. 18 19 19. Exhibit 18 consists of excerpts from the deposition transcript of Mr. Christopher Stringer, an Apple witness, that Apple has designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL– OUTSIDE 20 COUNSEL ONLY. 21 22 20. Exhibit 19 consists of excerpts from the deposition transcript of Mr. Douglas 23 Satzger, an Apple witness, that Apple has designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL– 24 ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY. 25 26 27 28 02198.51855/4502744.1 21. Exhibit 21 is a true and correct copy of a letter dated October 21, 2011, discussing documents and information which Apple has designated as HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL– ATTORNEY’S EYES ONLY. Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK -4HALL DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL 1 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed in 2 Redwood Shores, California on December 12, 2011. 3 4 /s/ Scott Hall Scott Hall 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 02198.51855/4502744.1 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK -5HALL DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL 1 2 GENERAL ORDER ATTESTATION I, Victoria Maroulis, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file the 3 foregoing document. I hereby attest pursuant to General Order 45.X.B. that concurrence in the 4 electronic filing of this document has been obtained from Scott Hall. 5 6 /s/ Victoria Maroulis 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 02198.51855/4502744.1 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK -6HALL DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?