Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 489

Proposed Order re #484 Opposition/Response to Motion, by Apple Inc.(a California corporation). (Kim, Esther) (Filed on 12/13/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
12
13

APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,

14
15

v.

18

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; and
SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company,

19

Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING
SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION FOR RELIEF
REGARDING LEAD COUNSEL
MEET AND CONFER
REQUIREMENT

Defendants.

16
17

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3082781

1

Pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rule 7-11, Samsung has submitted an

2

administrative motion for relief from the “lead trial counsel . . . meet and confer” requirement set

3

forth in the Court’s Minute Order and Case Management Order [D.N. 187].

4

Having considered the arguments of the parties and the papers submitted, the Court

5

hereby DENIES the requested relief from the Minute Order and Case Management Order.

6
7
8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December ___, 2011

By:
Honorable Lucy H. Koh
United States District Judge

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING SAMSUNG’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3082781