Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
524
ORDER by Judge Paul S. Grewal granting #504 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Plaintiff,
v.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean corporation; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation;
SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company.,
Case No.
11-cv-01846-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
APPLE’S ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENT
UNDER SEAL
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLE’S MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENT UNDER SEAL
CASE NO. 11-CV-01846-LHK
sf-3084055 v2
1
By administrative motion, Apple has moved to file the below-listed document under seal.
2
In support of this motion, Apple has filed the declaration required under Civil L.R. Rule 79-5 and
3
General Order No. 62, which provides evidence of good cause for this Court to permit filing
4
under seal. The declaration establishes that information contained in the document listed below is
5
“privileged or protectable as a trade secret or otherwise entitled to protection under the law.”
6
Civil L.R. 79-5(a). The motion is narrowly tailored to seek the sealing only of sealable
7
information.
8
9
Accordingly, for good cause shown, the Court ORDERS that the following document
shall be filed under seal:
10
1.
Declaration of Christopher J. Stringer in Support of Apple’s Opposition to
11
Samsung’s Motion to Compel.
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
DATED: _December 16_, 2011.
14
15
HONORABLE PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLE’S MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENT UNDER SEAL
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
sf-3084055 v2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?