Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 530

MOTION for Reconsideration re #510 Order on Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Motion for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Hankil Kang, #2 Proposed Order)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 12/21/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 APPLE INC., a California corporation, CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG 12 Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a 15 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New 16 York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, 17 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 18 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Defendants. 19 20 On December 16, 2011, the Court granted in part and denied in part Plaintiff Apple, 21 Inc.’s Unopposed Administrative Motion to File Apple’s Motion to Augment Record and 22 Supporting Documents Under Seal (Dkt. No. 510). Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung 23 Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, 24 “Samsung”) subsequently filed Samsung’s Motion for Leave to File Samsung’s Motion for 25 Reconsideration (“Motion”), pursuant to Civ. L.R. 7-9. 26 27 28 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK -1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 1 Having considered the arguments and the papers submitted, the Court hereby 2 ORDERS that Samsung’s Motion is GRANTED. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 DATED: December ___, 2011 7 8 9 The Honorable Lucy H. Koh United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK -2[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?