Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
530
MOTION for Reconsideration re #510 Order on Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Motion for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Hankil Kang, #2 Proposed Order)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 12/21/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG
12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
15 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
16 York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
17 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
18
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
FILE MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION
Defendants.
19
20
On December 16, 2011, the Court granted in part and denied in part Plaintiff Apple,
21
Inc.’s Unopposed Administrative Motion to File Apple’s Motion to Augment Record and
22
Supporting Documents Under Seal (Dkt. No. 510).
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung
23
Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively,
24
“Samsung”) subsequently filed Samsung’s Motion for Leave to File Samsung’s Motion for
25
Reconsideration (“Motion”), pursuant to Civ. L.R. 7-9.
26
27
28
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR LEAVE
TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
1
Having considered the arguments and the papers submitted, the Court hereby
2 ORDERS that Samsung’s Motion is GRANTED.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6 DATED:
December ___, 2011
7
8
9
The Honorable Lucy H. Koh
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION FOR LEAVE
TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?