Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 532

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Apple's Motion to Strike Evidence Not Disclosed as Required by Patent Local Rule 4-3(b) filed by Apple Inc.(a California corporation). (Attachments: #1 Apple Inc.s Motion to Strike Evidence Not Disclosed as Required by Patent Local Rule 4-3(b), #2 Declaration of Mark D. Selwyn in Support of Apples Motion to Strike, #3 Exhibit A to Apple's Motion to Strike, #4 Exhibit B to Apple's Motion to Strike, #5 Proposed Order on Apple's Motion to Strike)(Selwyn, Mark) (Filed on 12/22/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 HAROLD J. MCELHINNY (CA SBN 66781) hmcelhinny@mofo.com MICHAEL A. JACOBS (CA SBN 111664) mjacobs@mofo.com RICHARD S.J. HUNG (CA SBN 197425) rhung@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: (415) 268-7000 Facsimile: (415) 268-7522 7 8 9 WILLIAM F. LEE (pro hac vice) william.lee@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 60 State Street Boston, Massachusetts 02109 Telephone: (617) 526-6000 Facsimile: (617) 526-5000 MARK D. SELWYN (SBN 244180) mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP 950 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304 Telephone: (650) 858-6000 Facsimile: (650) 858-6100 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant Apple Inc. 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 12 13 14 APPLE INC., a California corporation, 15 Plaintiff, 16 17 18 19 vs. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation, and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 20 21 22 23 24 27 28 DECLARATION OF MARK D. SELWYN IN SUPPORT OF APPLE’S MOTION TO STRIKE Hearing: TBD Time: TBD Defendants. SUBMITTED UNDER SEAL SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation, and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Counterclaim-Plaintiffs, 25 26 Civil Action No. 11-CV-01846-LHK v. APPLE INC., a California corporation, Counterclaim-Defendant. DECLARATION OF MARK D. SELWYN IN SUPPORT OF APPLE’S MOTION TO STRIKE Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK) 1 I, Mark D. Selwyn, declare as follows: 2 1. I am a partner with the law firm of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP 3 and counsel for plaintiff and counterclaim-defendant Apple Inc. I submit this declaration in 4 support of Apple’s Motion to Strike Evidence Not Disclosed as Required by Patent Local Rule 5 4-3(b). I am familiar with and knowledgeable about the facts stated in this declaration and if 6 called upon could and would testify competently as to the statements made herein. 7 8 9 10 11 12 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the Deposition of Joe Tipton Cole, dated December 16, 2011. 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of a December 5, 2011 Letter from Bethany Stevens to Todd Briggs. I hereby declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. 13 14 Dated: December 22, 2011 /s/ Mark D. Selwyn Mark D. Selwyn 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DECLARATION OF MARK D. SELWYN IN SUPPORT OF APPLE’S MOTION TO STRIKE 2 Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK) 1 2 3 4 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document has been served on December 22, 2011 to all counsel of record who are deemed to have consented to electronic service via the Court’s CM/ECF system per Civil Local Rule 5.4. Any other counsel of record will be served by electronic mail, facsimile and/or overnight delivery. 6 7 /s/ Mark. D Selwyn Mark D. Selwyn 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DECLARATION OF MARK D. SELWYN IN SUPPORT OF APPLE’S MOTION TO STRIKE 3 Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?