Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
538
ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting #531 Motion to Shorten Time (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2011)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
1
2
3
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
4
Plaintiff,
5
6
7
8
9
vs.
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity, SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation, and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
12
13
14
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity, SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation, and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
15
16
17
18
ORDER GRANTING APPLE’S MOTION
TO SHORTEN TIME FOR BRIEFING
AND HEARING ON APPLE’S MOTION
TO STRIKE
Defendants.
10
11
Civil Action No. 11-CV-01846-LHK
Counterclaim-Plaintiffs,
v.
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Counterclaim-Defendant.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
ORDER
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)
OPPOS
FOR
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Plaintiff Apple Inc. (“Apple”) has moved pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-3
for an order shortening the briefing and hearing schedule for Apple’s Motion to Strike.
The Court finds that hearing both the claim construction and the motion to strike together
on the same day would maximize judicial efficiency. Therefore, Apple’s Motion to Shorten
Time for Briefing and Hearing on Apple’s Motion to Strike is GRANTED. The hearing on
Apple’s Motion to Strike is set for January 20, 2012, at 10:00 a.m. Defendants may file and
serve their opposition, not to exceed ten pages, no later than January 12, 2012. No further
8
briefing on the issue will be permitted without leave of the Court.
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
DATED: December 22, 2012
___________________________
Hon. Lucy H. Koh
United States District Court Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
ORDER
Case No. 11-cv-01846 (LHK)
OPPOS
FOR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?