Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
543
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. re #542 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal re Samsung's Response to Apple's Opening Claim Construction Brief (Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 12/23/2011)
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151)
2 charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
3 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 875-6600
4 Facsimile: (415) 875-6700
5 Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129)
kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com
6 Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603)
victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com
th
7 555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5 Floor
Redwood Shores, California 94065
8 Telephone: (650) 801-5000
Facsimile: (650) 801-5100
9
Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417)
10 michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com
865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor
11 Los Angeles, California 90017
Telephone: (213) 443-3000
12 Facsimile: (213) 443-3100
13 Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
14 AMERICA, INC. and SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC
15
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
18 APPLE INC., a California corporation,
Plaintiff,
19
20
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK
vs.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
21 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
22 ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
York corporation; SAMSUNG
23 TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
24
Defendants.
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4522554.1
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE________
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
I am employed in the County of San Mateo, State of California. I am over the age of
3 eighteen years and not a party to the within action; my business address is 555 Twin Dolphin
4 Drive, 5th Floor, Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139.
5
On December 22, 2011, I served true copies of the documents described as
6
1. Samsung’s Response to Apple’s Opening Claim Construction Brief
7
2. Declaration of Todd M. Briggs in Support of Samsung’s Response to Apple’s
8
Opening Claim Construction Brief
9 by emailing the aforementioned documents to the interested parties in this action as follows:
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Counsel for Apple, Inc.
HAROLD J. MCELHINNY
HMcElhinny@mofo.com
ALISON M. TUCHER
atucher@mofo.com
MICHAEL A. JACOBS
MJacobs@mofo.com
STEPHEN E. TAYLOR
staylor@tcolaw.com
JENNIFER LEE TAYLOR
JLeeTaylor@mofo.com
STEPHEN MCG. BUNDY
sbundy@tcolaw.com
RICHARD S.J. HUNG
rhung@mofo.com
JOSHUA R. BENSON
jbenson@tcolaw.com
JASON R. BARTLETT
JasonBartlett@mofo.com
WILLIAM F. LEE
william.lee@wilmerhale.com
19
20
21
22
DEOK KEUN MATTHEW AHN
dahn@mofo.com
MARK D. SELWYN, ESQ.
mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com
GRANT L. KIM
gkim@mofo.com
23
24
25
26
BY ELECTRONIC MAIL TRANSMISSION: I served the above documents by electronic mail
transmission from billtrac@quinnemanuel.com, transmitting PDF format copies of the documents
27
28
02198.51855/4522554.1
-2-
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE________
1 to each such person at the email address listed above.
The documents were transmitted by
2 electronic transmission and such transmission was reported as complete and without error.
3
4 Executed on December 22, 2011, at Redwood Shores, California.
5
/s/
Bill Trac____
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4522554.1
-3-
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE________
1
2
3
GENERAL ORDER ATTESTATION
I, Victoria F. Maroulis, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file the
4 foregoing CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.
5
In compliance with General Order 45 (X)(B), I
hereby attest that Bill Trac has concurred in this filing.
6
7 DATE: December 22, 2011
/s/ Victoria Maroulis
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4522554.1
-4-
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE________
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?