Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 555

MOTION to Shorten Time for Briefing and Hearing #554 Samsung's Motion to Extend Time filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Kassabian Declaration, #2 Proposed Order)(Maroulis, Victoria) (Filed on 12/29/2011) Modified on 12/30/2011 linking entry to document #554 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Charles K. Verhoeven (Cal. Bar No. 170151)  charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com 50 California Street, 22nd Floor  San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-6600  Facsimile: (415) 875-6700  Kevin P.B. Johnson (Cal. Bar No. 177129) kevinjohnson@quinnemanuel.com  Victoria F. Maroulis (Cal. Bar No. 202603) victoriamaroulis@quinnemanuel.com  555 Twin Dolphin Drive 5th Floor Redwood Shores, California 94065  Telephone: (650) 801-5000 Facsimile: (650) 801-5100  Michael T. Zeller (Cal. Bar No. 196417)  michaelzeller@quinnemanuel.com 865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor  Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: (213) 443-3000  Facsimile: (213) 443-3100  Attorneys for SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS  AMERICA, INC. and SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC   UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION  APPLE INC., a California corporation, CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK  DECLARATION OF RACHEL HERRICK KASSABIAN IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR BRIEFING AND HEARING ON ITS MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR COMPLIANCE WITH CERTAIN DEADLINES SET BY THE COURT'S DECEMBER 22, 2011 ORDER  Plaintiff, vs.  SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a Korean business entity; SAMSUNG  ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York corporation; SAMSUNG  TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,  Defendants.      02198.51855/4528196.1 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK KASSABIAN DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME ________ 1 I, Rachel Herrick Kassabian, declare: 2 1. I am a partner in the law firm of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, 3 counsel for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung 4 Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) in this action. Unless otherwise 5 indicated, I have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in this declaration and, if called upon as 6 a witness, I could and would testify as follows. 7 2. The relief requested in Samsung’s Motion to Shorten Time is necessary in order to 8 allow the Court to decide Samsung’s Motion to Extend Time for Compliance with Certain 9 Deadlines Set by the Court’s December 22, 2011 Order before the Court-ordered deadline for 10 compliance passes. Pursuant to the Court’s order, Samsung has until December 31, 2011 to 11 complete the production of a broad range of documents requested by Apple. Samsung has been 12 working literally around the clock to comply with Apple’s request, and will have produced the 13 majority of the requested documents by the December 31 deadline. 14 3. Despite Samsung’s round-the-clock efforts, there is a discrete subset of documents 15 that Samsung will not be able to produce by the December 31 deadline. 16 4. Counsel for Samsung reached out to counsel for Apple as soon as it became 17 apparent that Samsung would not be able to meet the December 31 deadline with respect to the 18 limited subset of documents. Samsung offered to stipulate to a revised deadline of January 9, 19 2012 for the limited documents remaining to be produced. At 1:43pm on December 29, 2011, 20 Apple communicated its intention to oppose Samsung’s request. 21 5. Counsel for Samsung also requested that, in the event that Apple opposed 22 Samsung’s Motion to Extend Time, Apple stipulate to the expedited briefing schedule set forth in 23 Samsung’s motion to shorten time . Apple indicated without explanation that it opposes this 24 request as well, and offered no alternative schedule. 25 6. Pursuant to L.R. 6-3(a)(5), previous time modifications in the case, whether by 26 stipulation or Court order, include the following: 27 28 02198.51855/4528196.1 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK -2KASSABIAN DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME 1 A. 2 3 On April 26, 2011, the Court granted Apple’s motion to shorten time for briefing and hearing on its motion to expedite discovery. (Dkt No. 26.) B. On May 9, 2011, Apple and Samsung stipulated and agreed that the time for 4 Samsung to serve responsive pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(a) shall be 75 5 days after April 21, 2011. On May 10, 2011, the Court signed the 6 Stipulation and Order regarding an extension of time for Samsung to serve 7 responsive pleadings. (Dkt No. 40.) 8 C. time for hearing and briefing on Samsung’s Motion to Compel Reciprocal 9 10 11 On June 1, 2011, the Court granted in part Samsung’s request to shorten Expedited Discovery. D. (Dkt No. 59.) On July 18, 2011 the Court ordered a briefing schedule related to expedited 12 discovery and Apple’s motion for a preliminary injunction, setting dates 13 from July 2011 through the October 13, 2011 hearing on Apple’s Motion 14 for Preliminary Injunction. (Dkt No. 115.) 15 E. On July 21, 2011, the Court granted the parties’ stipulation to extend the 16 time for briefing Samsung’s Motion to Disqualify Counsel Bridges & 17 Mavrakakis, LLP. (Dkt No. 125.) 18 F. On September 1, 2011 the Court granted Samsung’s stipulated motion to 19 expedite briefing on Samsung’s Motion to Compel Apple to Produce 20 Documents and Things. 21 G. (Dkt No. 199) On September 6, 2011 the Court granted Apple’s stipulated motion to 22 extend time for Apple to respond to Samsung’s Motion to Exclude the 23 Ordinary Observer Opinions of Apple Expert Cooper Woodring. 24 210.) 25 26 H. (Dkt No. On September 20, 2011, the Court granted Samsung’s unopposed motion to change the hearing date on its motion to dismiss. (Dkt No. 244.) 27 28 02198.51855/4528196.1 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK -3KASSABIAN DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME 1 I. On September 23, 2011, the Court granted Apple’s motion to shorten time to expedite briefing on Apple’s motion to compel. (Dkt No. 255.) 2 3 J. On October 3, 2011, the Court granted-in-part Samsung’s motion to shorten 4 the briefing and hearing schedule on Samsung’s motion to compel. 5 No. 287.) 6 K. (Dkt On October 27, 2011, the Court granted Apple’s motion to shorten time for 7 the briefing and hearing schedule for its motion for a protective order. 8 (Dkt No. 332.) 9 L. On October 31, 2011, the Court granted Samsung’s motion to shorten the 10 briefing and hearing schedule on Samsung’s motion to compel. 11 350.) 12 M. On December 9, 2011, the Court granted Apple’s motion to shorten time for briefing and hearing on Apple’s motion to compel. 13 14 N. (Dkt No. (Dkt No. 477.) On December 13, 2011, the Court granted Samsung’s motion to shorten 15 time for briefing and hearing on Samsung’s motion to compel. 16 499). 17 O. On December 22, 2011, the Court granted Apple’s motion to shorten time for briefing and hearing on Apple’s motion to strike. (Dkt. No. 538). 18 19 (Dkt. No. 7. The present request to shorten the briefing and hearing schedule on Samsung’s 20 Motion to Extend Time for Compliance with Certain Deadlines Set by the Court’s December 22, 21 2011 Order will not affect the schedule of the case. 22 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed in 23 Truckee, California on December 29, 2011. 24 25 /s/ Rachel Herrick Kassabian 26 27 28 02198.51855/4528196.1 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK -4KASSABIAN DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME 1 2 General Order 45 Attestation I, Victoria F. Maroulis, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this 3 Declaration. In compliance with General Order 45(X)(B), I hereby attest that Rachel Herrick 4 Kassabian has concurred in this filing. 5 /s/ Victoria Maroulis 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 02198.51855/4528196.1 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK -5KASSABIAN DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?