Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al
Filing
566
ORDER by Judge Paul S. Grewal granting #555 Motion to Shorten Time (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/30/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
11
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
APPLE INC., a California corporation,
CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a
15 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New
16 York corporation; SAMSUNG
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA,
17 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
18
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO SHORTEN
TIME FOR BRIEFING AND HEARING
ON ITS MOTION TO EXTEND TIME
FOR COMPLIANCE WITH CERTAIN
DEADLINES SET BY THE COURT’S
DECEMBER 22, 2011 ORDER
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4528549.1
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung
Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) have moved pursuant to Civil
Local Rule 6-3 for an order shortening the briefing and hearing schedule for Samsung’s Motion to
Extend Time for Compliance with Certain Deadlines Set by the Court’s December 22, 2011
Order.
Having considered the arguments of the parties and the papers submitted, and finding good
cause therefor, the Court hereby GRANTS Samsung’s Motion to Shorten Time.
Apple shall file
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION
TO SHORTEN TIME FOR BRIEFING AND HEARING
1 and serve its opposition papers no later than 2:00 p.m. on Friday, December 30, 2011. Samsung
2 shall not file a reply brief. The Court will decide Samsung’s motion without a hearing.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6 DATED:
December _30_, 2011
7
8
9
10
Hon. Paul S. Grewal
United States Magistrate Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
02198.51855/4528549.1
Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION
TO SHORTEN TIME FOR BRIEFING AND HEARING
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?