Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 566

ORDER by Judge Paul S. Grewal granting #555 Motion to Shorten Time (psglc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/30/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 11 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION APPLE INC., a California corporation, CASE NO. 11-cv-01846-LHK-PSG Plaintiff, 13 vs. 14 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., a 15 Korean business entity; SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New 16 York corporation; SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, 17 LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, 18 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR BRIEFING AND HEARING ON ITS MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR COMPLIANCE WITH CERTAIN DEADLINES SET BY THE COURT’S DECEMBER 22, 2011 ORDER Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 02198.51855/4528549.1 Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc., and Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC (collectively, “Samsung”) have moved pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-3 for an order shortening the briefing and hearing schedule for Samsung’s Motion to Extend Time for Compliance with Certain Deadlines Set by the Court’s December 22, 2011 Order. Having considered the arguments of the parties and the papers submitted, and finding good cause therefor, the Court hereby GRANTS Samsung’s Motion to Shorten Time. Apple shall file Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK -1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR BRIEFING AND HEARING 1 and serve its opposition papers no later than 2:00 p.m. on Friday, December 30, 2011. Samsung 2 shall not file a reply brief. The Court will decide Samsung’s motion without a hearing. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 DATED: December _30_, 2011 7 8 9 10 Hon. Paul S. Grewal United States Magistrate Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 02198.51855/4528549.1 Case No. 11-cv-01846-LHK -2[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME FOR BRIEFING AND HEARING

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?