Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. et al

Filing 590

ORDER Regarding Samsung's Motions for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 1/6/2012. (lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 APPLE, INC., a California corporation, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., A ) Korean corporation; SAMSUNG ) ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York ) corporation; SAMSUNG ) TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, ) a Delaware limited liability company, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTIONS TO RECONSIDER Samsung has filed a motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration of a Court order 20 denying a motion to seal Samsung documents as confidential. ECF Nos. 547 (motion); 515 21 (order). Samsung has also filed a motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration of a Court 22 order denying in part a motion to seal a Samsung document designated as confidential. ECF Nos. 23 530 (motion) & 510 (order). 24 Having considered the motions, the Court GRANTS Samsung leave to file motions for 25 reconsideration. The Court considers the motions for leave to file to be sufficient briefing on the 26 issue of whether it should amend the sealing orders. Samsung need not file additional briefing. 27 Apple may file a response, if any, by January 10, 2012. The motions thereupon will be submitted 28 without oral argument. 1 Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 Dated: January 6, 2012 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK ORDER GRANTING SAMSUNG’S MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?